@article{SchotterLeinengervonderMalsburg2017,
  author    = {Schotter, Elizabeth Roye and Leinenger, Mallorie and von der Malsburg, Titus Raban},
  title     = {When your mind skips what your eyes fixate},
  series = {Psychonomic bulletin \& review : a journal of the Psychonomic Society},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Psychonomic bulletin \& review : a journal of the Psychonomic Society},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1069-9384},
  doi       = {10.3758/s13423-017-1356-y},
  pages     = {1884 -- 1890},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The phenomenon of forced fixations suggests that readers sometimes fixate a word (due to oculomotor constraints) even though they intended to skip it (due to parafoveal cognitive-linguistic processing). We investigate whether this leads readers to look directly at a word but not pay attention to it. We used a gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to dissociate parafoveal and foveal information (e.g., the word phone changed to scarf once the reader's eyes moved to it) and asked questions about the sentence to determine which one the reader encoded. When the word was skipped or fixated only briefly (i.e., up to 100 ms) readers were more likely to report reading the parafoveal than the fixated word, suggesting that there are cases in which readers look directly at a word but their minds ignore it, leading to the illusion of reading something they did not fixate.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DambacherDimigenBraunetal.2012,
  author    = {Dambacher, Michael and Dimigen, Olaf and Braun, Mario and Wille, Kristin and Jacobs, Arthur M. and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Stimulus onset asynchrony and the timeline of word recognition: Event-related potentials during sentence reading},
  series = {Neuropsychologia : an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Neuropsychologia : an international journal in behavioural and cognitive neuroscience},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0028-3932},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.011},
  pages     = {1852 -- 1870},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Three ERP experiments examined the effect of word presentation rate (i.e., stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA) on the time course of word frequency and predictability effects in sentence reading. In Experiments 1 and 2, sentences were presented word-by-word in the screen center at an SOA of 700 and 490 ms, respectively. While these rates are typical for psycholinguistic ERP research, natural reading happens at a considerably faster pace. Accordingly. Experiment 3 employed a near-normal SOA of 280 ms, which approximated the rate of normal reading. Main results can be summarized as follows: (1) The onset latency of early frequency effects decreases gradually with increasing presentation rates. (2) An early interaction between top-down and bottom-up processing is observed only under a near-normal SOA. (3) N400 predictability effects occur later and are smaller at a near-normal (i.e., high) presentation rate than at the lower rates commonly used in ERP experiments. (4) ERP morphology is different at the shortest compared to longer SOAs. Together, the results point to a special role of a near-normal presentation rate for visual word recognition and therefore suggest that SOA should be taken into account in research of natural reading.},
  language  = {en}
}