@article{TronickeVillamorGreen2006, author = {Tronicke, Jens and Villamor, P and Green, Alan G.}, title = {Detailed shallow geometry and vertical displacement estimates of the Maleme Fault Zone, New Zealand, using 2D and 3D georadar}, year = {2006}, abstract = {In an attempt to map the shallow geometry of the Maleme Fault Zone (North Island, New Zealand) and estimate vertical displacements of selected fault strands, we have collected 2D and 3D georadar data using 100 MHz antennae. The 2D data consisted of three parallel georadar lines recorded perpendicular to the axis of the well-defined graben of the Maleme Fault Zone. These similar to 160 in long lines, which were 7.5 m apart, crossed several fault strands on either side of the graben axis. The processed georadar sections revealed two prominent parallel reflections that originated from the boundaries of Late Pleistocene lacustrine and tephra deposits. Distinct vertical offsets of these reflections allowed us to estimate displacernents at individual fault strands across the entire inner graben. The total displacements represented by these offsets was similar to 10-20\% greater than that inferred from geomorphological studies, thus demonstrating the limitations of surface observations for determining cumulative fault movements. The 3D georadar data set, recorded across an area of similar to 70x similar to 20 in to one side of the graben axis, provided key details on individual fault strands. For the 3D visualization of fault-related structures, various spatial attribute analyses based on the cosine of the instantaneous phase proved to be useful}, language = {en} } @article{PaascheTronickeHolligeretal.2006, author = {Paasche, Hendrik and Tronicke, Jens and Holliger, Klaus and Green, Alan G. and Maurer, Hansruedi}, title = {Integration of diverse physical-property models : subsurface zonation and petrophysical parameter estimation based on fuzzy c-means cluster analyses}, doi = {10.1190/1.2192927}, year = {2006}, abstract = {Inversions of an individual geophysical data set can be highly nonunique, and it is generally difficult to determine petrophysical parameters from geophysical data. We show that both issues can be addressed by adopting a statistical multiparameter approach that requires the acquisition, processing, and separate inversion of two or more types of geophysical data. To combine information contained in the physical-property models that result from inverting the individual data sets and to estimate the spatial distribution of petrophysical parameters in regions where they are known at only a few locations. we demonstrate the potential of the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering technique. After testing this new approach on synthetic data, we apply it to limited crosshole georadar, crosshole seismic, gamma-log, and slug-test data acquired within a shallow alluvial aquifer. The derived multiparameter model effectively outlines the major sedimentary units observed in numerous boreholes and provides plausible estimates for the spatial distributions of gamma-ray emitters and hydraulic conductivity}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{Tronicke2006, author = {Tronicke, Jens}, title = {Patterns in geophysical data and models}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-7096}, year = {2006}, abstract = {Interdisziplin{\"a}res Zentrum f{\"u}r Musterdynamik und Angewandte Fernerkundung Workshop vom 9. - 10. Februar 2006}, language = {en} } @article{BoenigerTronickeHolligeretal.2006, author = {Boeniger, Urs and Tronicke, Jens and Holliger, Klaus and Becht, Andreas}, title = {Multi-offset vertical radar profiling for subsurface reflection imaging}, series = {Journal of environmental \& engineering geophysics : JEEG}, volume = {11}, journal = {Journal of environmental \& engineering geophysics : JEEG}, number = {4}, publisher = {EEGS}, address = {Denver}, issn = {1083-1363}, doi = {10.2113/JEEG11.4.289}, pages = {289 -- 298}, year = {2006}, abstract = {The vertical radar profiling (VRP) technique uses surface-to-borehole acquisition geometries comparable to vertical seismic profiling (VSP). Major differences between the two methods do arise due to the fundamentally differing nature of the velocity-depth gradients and transmitter/receiver directivities. Largely for this reason, VRP studies have so far essentially been limited to the reconstruction of velocity-depth profiles by inverting direct arrival times from single-offset VRP surveys. In this study, we investigate the potential to produce high-resolution subsurface reflection images from multi-offset VRP data. Two synthetic data sets are used to evaluate a processing strategy suitably adapted from VSP processing. Despite the fundamental differences between VRP and VSP data, we found that our processing approach is capable of reconstructing subsurface structures of comparable complexity to those routinely imaged by VSP data. Finally, we apply our processing flow to two multi-offset VRP data sets recorded at a well constrained hydrogeophysical test site in SW-Germany. The inferred VRP images are compared with high-quality surface georadar reflection images and lithological logs available at the borehole locations. We find that the VRP images are in good agreement with the surface georadar data and reliably detect the major lithological boundaries. Due to the significantly shorter ray-paths, the depth penetration of the VRP data is, however, considerably higher than that of the surface georadar data. VRP reflection images thus provide an effective means for the depth-calibration and extension of conventional surface georadar data in the vicinity of boreholes.}, language = {en} } @article{BelinaDafflonTronickeetal.2009, author = {Belina, Florian A. and Dafflon, Baptiste and Tronicke, Jens and Holliger, Klaus}, title = {Enhancing the vertical resolution of surface georadar data}, issn = {0926-9851}, doi = {10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.08.011}, year = {2009}, abstract = {There are far-reaching conceptual similarities between bi-static surface georadar and post-stack, "zero-offset" seismic reflection data, which is expressed in largely identical processing flows. One important difference is, however, that standard deconvolution algorithms routinely used to enhance the vertical resolution of seismic data are notoriously problematic or even detrimental to the overall signal quality when applied to surface georadar data. We have explored various options for alleviating this problem and have tested them on a geologically well-constrained surface georadar dataset. Standard stochastic and direct deterministic deconvolution approaches proved to be largely unsatisfactory. While least-squares-type deterministic deconvolution showed some promise, the inherent uncertainties involved in estimating the source wavelet introduced some artificial "ringiness". In contrast, we found spectral balancing approaches to be effective, practical and robust means for enhancing the vertical resolution of surface georadar data, particularly, but not exclusively, in the uppermost part of the georadar section, which is notoriously plagued by the interference of the direct air- and groundwaves. For the data considered in this study, it can be argued that band- limited spectral blueing may provide somewhat better results than standard band-limited spectral whitening, particularly in the uppermost part of the section affected by the interference of the air- and groundwaves. Interestingly, this finding is consistent with the fact that the amplitude spectrum resulting from least-squares-type deterministic deconvolution is characterized by a systematic enhancement of higher frequencies at the expense of lower frequencies and hence is blue rather than white. It is also consistent with increasing evidence that spectral "blueness" is a seemingly universal, albeit enigmatic, property of the distribution of reflection coefficients in the Earth. Our results therefore indicate that spectral balancing techniques in general and spectral blueing in particular represent simple, yet effective means of enhancing the vertical resolution of surface georadar data and, in many cases, could turn out to be a preferable alternative to standard deconvolution approaches.}, language = {en} } @article{DietrichTronicke2009, author = {Dietrich, Peter and Tronicke, Jens}, title = {Integrated analysis and interpretation of cross-hole P- and S-wave tomograms : a case study}, issn = {1569-4445}, doi = {10.3997/1873-0604.2008041}, year = {2009}, abstract = {We present cross-hole P- and S-wave seismic experiments that have been performed along a similar to 100 m long transect for the detailed characterization of a contaminated sedimentary site (Bitterfeld research test site, Germany). We invert the corresponding first break arrival times for the P- and S-wave velocity structure and compare two different strategies to interpret these models in terms of pertinent lithological and geotechnical parameter variations. The first (common) approach is based on directly translating the tomographic velocity models into the parameters of interest (e.g., elastic moduli). The second (zonal) approach first reduces the tomographic parameter information to a limited number of characteristic velocity combinations via k-means cluster analysis. Then, for each zone (cluster) further parameters including uncertainties can be estimated. In the presented case study, Our results indicate that the zonal approach provides an effective means for the integrated interpretation of different co-located data.}, language = {en} } @article{BoenigerTronicke2010, author = {Boeniger, Urs and Tronicke, Jens}, title = {Improving the interpretability of 3D GPR data using target-specific attributes : application to tomb detection}, issn = {0305-4403}, doi = {10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.049}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Three-dimensional (3D) ground-penetrating radar (GPR) represents an efficient high-resolution geophysical surveying method allowing to explore archaeological sites in a non-destructive manner. To effectively analyze large 3D GPR data sets, their combination with modern visualization techniques (e.g., 3D isoamplitude displays) has been acknowledged to facilitate interpretation beyond classical time-slice analysis. In this study, we focus on the application of data attributes (namely energy, coherency, and similarity), originally developed for petroleum reservoir related problems addressed by reflection seismology, to emphasize temporal and spatial variations within GPR data cubes. Based on two case studies, we illustrate the potential of such attribute based analyses towards a more comprehensive 3D GPR data interpretation. The main goal of both case studies was to localize and potentially characterize tombs inside medieval chapels situated in the state of Brandenburg, Germany. By comparing the calculated data attributes to the conventionally processed data cubes, we demonstrate the superior interpretability of the coherency and the similarity attribute for target identification and characterization.}, language = {en} } @article{BoenigerTronicke2010, author = {Boeniger, Urs and Tronicke, Jens}, title = {Improving the interpretability of 3D GPR data using target-specific attributes : application to tomb detection (vol 37, pg 360, 2009)}, issn = {0305-4403}, doi = {10.1016/S0305-4403(10)00046-4}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Publisher's not}, language = {en} } @article{BoenigerTronicke2010, author = {Boeniger, Urs and Tronicke, Jens}, title = {Integrated data analysis at an archaeological site : a case study using 3D GPR, magnetic, and high-resolution topographic data}, issn = {0016-8033}, doi = {10.1190/1.3460432}, year = {2010}, abstract = {We have collected magnetic, 3D ground-penetrating-radar (GPR), and topographic data at an archaeological site within the Palace Garden of Paretz, Germany. The survey site covers an area of approximately 35 x 40 m across a hill structure (dips of up to 15 degrees) that is partly covered by trees. The primary goal of this study was to detect and locate the remains of ancient architectural elements, which, from historical records, were expected to be buried in the subsurface at this site. To acquire our geophysical data, we used a recently developed surveying approach that combines the magnetic and GPR instrument with a tracking total station (TTS). Besides efficient data acquisition, this approach provides positional information at an accuracy within the centimeter range. At the Paretz field site, this information was critical for processing and analyzing our geophysical data (in particular, GPR data) and enabled us to generate a high-resolution digital terrain model (DTM) of the surveyed area. Integrated analysis and interpretation based on composite images of the magnetic, 3D GPR, and high-resolution DTM data as well as selected attributes derived from these data sets allowed us to outline the remains of an artificial grotto and temple. Our work illustrates the benefit of using multiple surveying technologies, analyzing and interpreting the resulting data in an integrated fashion. It further demonstrates how modern surveying solutions allow for efficient, accurate data acquisition even in difficult terrain.}, language = {en} } @article{BoenigerTronicke2010, author = {Boeniger, Urs and Tronicke, Jens}, title = {On the potential of kinematic GPR surveying using a self-tracking total station : evaluating system crosstalk and latency}, issn = {0196-2892}, doi = {10.1109/Tgrs.2010.2048332}, year = {2010}, abstract = {In this paper, we present an efficient kinematic ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveying setup using a self- tracking total station (TTS). This setup combines the ability of modern GPR systems to interface with Global Positioning System (GPS) and the capability of the employed TTS system to immediately make the positioning information available in a standardized GPS data format. Wireless communication between the GPR and the TTS system is established by using gain variable radio modems. Such a kinematic surveying setup faces two major potential limitations. First, possible crosstalk effects between the GPR and the positioning system have to be evaluated. Based on multiple walkaway experiments, we show that, for reasonable field setups, instrumental crosstalk has no significant impact on GPR data quality. Second, we investigate systematic latency (i.e., the time delay between the actual position measurement by TTS and its fusion with the GPR data) and its impact on the positional precision of kinematically acquired 2-D and 3-D GPR data. To quantify latency for our kinematic survey setup, we acquired forward-reverse profile pairs across a well-known subsurface target. Comparing the forward and reverse GPR images using three fidelity measures allows determining the optimum latency value and correcting for it. Accounting for both of these potential limitations allows us to kinematically acquire high- quality and high-precision GPR data using off-the-shelf instrumentation without further hardware modifications. Until now, these issues have not been investigated in detail, and thus, we believe that our findings have significant implications also for other geophysical surveying approaches.}, language = {en} }