@article{MikolajReichGuentner2019, author = {Mikolaj, Michal and Reich, Marvin and G{\"u}ntner, Andreas}, title = {Resolving geophysical signals by terrestrial gravimetry}, series = {Journal of geophysical research : Solid earth}, volume = {124}, journal = {Journal of geophysical research : Solid earth}, number = {2}, publisher = {American Geophysical Union}, address = {Washington}, issn = {2169-9313}, doi = {10.1029/2018JB016682}, pages = {2153 -- 2165}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Terrestrial gravimetry is increasingly used to monitor mass transport processes in geophysics boosted by the ongoing technological development of instruments. Resolving a particular phenomenon of interest, however, requires a set of gravity corrections of which the uncertainties have not been addressed up to now. In this study, we quantify the time domain uncertainty of tide, global atmospheric, large-scale hydrological, and nontidal ocean loading corrections. The uncertainty is assessed by comparing the majority of available global models for a suite of sites worldwide. The average uncertainty expressed as root-mean-square error equals 5.1nm/s(2), discounting local hydrology or air pressure. The correction-induced uncertainty of gravity changes over various time periods of interest ranges from 0.6nm/s(2) for hours up to a maximum of 6.7nm/s(2) for 6months. The corrections are shown to be significant and should be applied for most geophysical applications of terrestrial gravimetry. From a statistical point of view, however, resolving subtle gravity effects in the order of few nanometers per square second is challenged by the uncertainty of the corrections. Plain Language Summary Many scientists are exploring ways to benefit from gravity measurements in fields of high societal relevance such as monitoring of volcanoes or measuring the amount of water in underground. Any application of such new methods, however, requires careful preparation of the gravity measurements. The intention of the preparation process is to ensure that the measurements do not contain information about processes that are not of interest. For that reason, the influence of atmosphere, ocean, tides, and hydrology needs to be reduced from the gravity. In this study, we investigate how this reduction process influences the quality of the measurement. We found that the precision degrades especially owing to the hydrology. The ocean plays an important role at sites close to the coast and the atmosphere at sites located in mountains. The overall errors of the reductions may complicate a reliable use of gravity measurements in certain studies focusing on very small signals. Nevertheless, the precision of gravity reductions alone does not obstruct a meaningful use of gravity measurements in most research fields. Details specifying the reduction precision are provided in this study allowing scientist dealing with gravity measurements to decide if their signal of interest can be reliably resolved.}, language = {en} } @article{MikolajGuentnerBruninietal.2019, author = {Mikolaj, Michal and G{\"u}ntner, Andreas and Brunini, Claudio and Wziontek, Hartmut and Gende, Mauricio and Schr{\"o}der, Stephan and Cassino, Augusto M. and Pasquare, Alfredo and Reich, Marvin and Hartmann, Anne and Oreiro, Fernando Ariel and Pendiuk, Jonathan and Guarracino, Luis and Antokoletz, Ezequiel D.}, title = {Hydrometeorological and gravity signals at the Argentine-German Geodetic Observatory (AGGO) in La Plata}, series = {Earth system science data}, volume = {11}, journal = {Earth system science data}, number = {4}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1866-3508}, doi = {10.5194/essd-11-1501-2019}, pages = {1501 -- 1513}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The Argentine-German Geodetic Observatory (AGGO) is one of the very few sites in the Southern Hemisphere equipped with comprehensive cutting-edge geodetic instrumentation. The employed observation techniques are used for a wide range of geophysical applications. The data set provides gravity time series and selected gravity models together with the hydrometeorological monitoring data of the observatory. These parameters are of great interest to the scientific community, e.g. for achieving accurate realization of terrestrial and celestial reference frames. Moreover, the availability of the hydrometeorological products is beneficial to inhabitants of the region as they allow for monitoring of environmental changes and natural hazards including extreme events. The hydrological data set is composed of time series of groundwater level, modelled and observed soil moisture content, soil temperature, and physical soil properties and aquifer properties. The meteorological time series include air temperature, humidity, pressure, wind speed, solar radiation, precipitation, and derived reference evapotranspiration. These data products are extended by gravity models of hydrological, oceanic, La Plata estuary, and atmospheric effects. The quality of the provided meteorological time series is tested via comparison to the two closest WMO (World Meteorological Organization) sites where data are available only in an inferior temporal resolution. The hydrological series are validated by comparing the respective forward-modelled gravity effects to independent gravity observations reduced up to a signal corresponding to local water storage variation. Most of the time series cover the time span between April 2016 and November 2018 with either no or only few missing data points. The data set is available at https://doi.org/10.588/GFZ.5.4.2018.001 (Mikolaj et al., 2018).}, language = {en} }