@misc{Schwarz2005,
  author    = {Schwarz, Siegfried},
  title     = {{\"U}ber franz{\"o}sischen Eigenwillen in der europ{\"a}ischen Politik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48036},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The negative vote of the French population to the European Constitution shocked the European politics. It shifted the power constellations within the Union. By giving historical examples, the author explains that the refusal of the French population is not a new phenomenon. As a result, the article suggests to slow down the European integration process in order to prevent further setbacks.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kleger2010,
  author    = {Kleger, Heinz},
  title     = {{\"U}ber das erfolgreiche Scheitern einer europ{\"a}ischen Verfassung},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62947},
  pages     = {21 -- 41},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Inhalt: Der Laekener Verfassungsauftrag Der Europ{\"a}ische Konvent als Meilenstein der europ{\"a}ischen Integration Die Ratifizierungskrise Ein Elitenpoker um den Krisenausgang Schlussbemerkungen Literatur},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Karolewski2005,
  author    = {Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel},
  title     = {Zwischen Machtstreben und Toleranz : Verfassungsdiskurs in Polen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48045},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The Polish discourse about the European Constitution has one feature in common with the discourses of other member states: it deals with everything but the text of the Constitution Treaty itself. At its core it oscillates between the Polish striving for power in the EU and the toleration for cultural difference in Europe. The opposite of the latter has been particularly significant during the referendum debates in France and the Netherlands, which let to the rejection of the constitutional treaty.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Boeckenfoerde2004,
  author    = {B{\"o}ckenf{\"o}rde, Stephan},
  title     = {Wieso der Europapessimismus? : Eine Frage an Gunther Hellmann},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46568},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Huelsse2004,
  author    = {H{\"u}lsse, Rainer},
  title     = {When culture determines politics : wie der Deutsche Bundestag die T{\"u}rkei von der EU fernh{\"a}lt},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9717},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Should Turkey become a member of the EU? This is one of the most controversial issues in German European politics now. While the Social Democrats and the Green Party seem to be in favour, the Christian Democrats strongly oppose it. This paper demonstrates that both sides - their contrary political preferences notwithstanding- share one central belief: Turkey does not fit into the EU for cultural reasons. Through a close reading of parliamentary debates on EUenlargement the article reconstructs how Turkey is made Europe's other.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Franzke2009,
  author    = {Franzke, Jochen},
  title     = {Wertepolitik versus Realpolitik : die Russlandpolitik der Regierung Merkel/Steinmeier},
  issn      = {0944-8101},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32768},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Kooperative Beziehungen zu Russland sind angesichts der politisch-wirtschaftlichen Interessenlage, der geopolitischen Realit{\"a}ten im Osten Europas und des geschichtlichen Hintergrundes in der deutschen politischen Klasse Konsens. Mit dem Begriff der strategischen Partnerschaft werden die deutsch-russischen Beziehungen immer wieder charakterisiert, d. h. diese Kooperation soll weit {\"u}ber die normalen Interessen Deutschlands hinausgehen und eine globalpolitische Dimension erreichen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{BielawskiJurišićLenzetal.2006,
  author    = {Bielawski, Martina and Jurišić, J. and Lenz, T. and Maxian Rusche, T. and Nippert, C.},
  title     = {Via : communis Europa ; Europe's architecture in 2020},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-48454},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Forum: EU-Diplomatie im Jahre 2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Koszel2010,
  author    = {Koszel, Bogdan},
  title     = {Verfassung f{\"u}r Europa und Vertrag von Lissabon},
  series = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  journal   = {WeltTrends-Papiere},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1864-0656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62997},
  pages     = {117 -- 143},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@techreport{VasquezCarruthers2018,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Vasquez Carruthers, Juan Francisco},
  title     = {UNHCR and the European refugee crisis},
  series = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  journal   = {Staat, Recht und Politik - Forschungs- und Diskussionspapiere},
  number    = {5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-410429},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Since 2015, the European Union has struggled to deal with the influx of refugees coming into its territories. The number of institutions involved in designing a competent response approach, com-bined with the unilateral and uncoordinated state reactions, have left unclear where to look for when searching for answers and new alternatives. Can the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) take a leading role in solving this and future crises? After a brief recapitulation of the crisis, an analysis of UNHCR's statue, relationship to international law, and doctrine will put this question to the test while exploring options that are not only available but also feasible in a system where politics trump both legality and morality. If UNHCR is to play an active role in fu-ture refugee policies and become the lead agency it once was, a new daring and innovative approach has to emerge in order to readapt to the power relations that prevail in the twenty-first century.},
  subject      = {V{\"o}lkerrecht},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Jorgensen2004,
  author    = {Jorgensen, Knud Erik},
  title     = {Three doctrines on European foreign policy},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46318},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Taking its departure from the debate on the Iraq war, the article examines three so-called „doctrines" on European foreign policy. According to the first one, there is no such thing as an EU foreign policy. This may come as a surprise for policy-makers but is a common view among media commentators, analysts and some diplomats. The second doctrine holds that the EU's foreign policy has been, is, and always will be a failure. Reasons for this gloomy view show considerable variations and are most likely unsustainable in the long run. The third approach is more optimistic, counting on the EU's material volume, yet often ignoring the need to politically cash in if international clout is the quest.},
  language  = {en}
}