@article{Knigge2020, author = {Knigge, Michel}, title = {Use of evidence to promote inclusive education development commentary on Mel Ainscow. Promoting inclusion and equity in education}, series = {Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy}, volume = {6}, journal = {Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {2002-0317}, doi = {10.1080/20020317.2020.1730093}, pages = {21 -- 24}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In his essay, Mel Ainscow looks at inclusion and equity from an international perspective and makes suggestions on how to develop inclusive education in a 'whole-system approach'. After discussing different conceptions of inclusion and equity, he describes international policies which address them. From this international macro-level, Ainscow zooms in to the meso-level of the school and its immediate environment, defining dimensions to be considered for an inclusive school development. One of these dimensions is the 'use of evidence'. In my comment, I want to focus on this dimension and discuss its scope and the potential to apply it in inclusive education development. As a first and important precondition, Ainscow explains that different circumstances lead to different linguistic uses of the term 'inclusive education'. Thus, the term 'inclusive education' does not refer to an identical set of objectives across countries, and neither does the term 'equity'.}, language = {en} } @article{WaitelonisJuergesSack2019, author = {Waitelonis, J{\"o}rg and J{\"u}rges, Henrik and Sack, Harald}, title = {Remixing entity linking evaluation datasets for focused benchmarking}, series = {Semantic Web}, volume = {10}, journal = {Semantic Web}, number = {2}, publisher = {IOS Press}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1570-0844}, doi = {10.3233/SW-180334}, pages = {385 -- 412}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In recent years, named entity linking (NEL) tools were primarily developed in terms of a general approach, whereas today numerous tools are focusing on specific domains such as e.g. the mapping of persons and organizations only, or the annotation of locations or events in microposts. However, the available benchmark datasets necessary for the evaluation of NEL tools do not reflect this focalizing trend. We have analyzed the evaluation process applied in the NEL benchmarking framework GERBIL [in: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'15), International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2015, pp. 1133-1143, Semantic Web 9(5) (2018), 605-625] and all its benchmark datasets. Based on these insights we have extended the GERBIL framework to enable a more fine grained evaluation and in depth analysis of the available benchmark datasets with respect to different emphases. This paper presents the implementation of an adaptive filter for arbitrary entities and customized benchmark creation as well as the automated determination of typical NEL benchmark dataset properties, such as the extent of content-related ambiguity and diversity. These properties are integrated on different levels, which also enables to tailor customized new datasets out of the existing ones by remixing documents based on desired emphases. Besides a new system library to enrich provided NIF [in: International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'13), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8219, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 98-113] datasets with statistical information, best practices for dataset remixing are presented, and an in depth analysis of the performance of entity linking systems on special focus datasets is presented.}, language = {en} } @article{SallenHemmingRichartz2017, author = {Sallen, Jeffrey and Hemming, Karen and Richartz, Alfred}, title = {Facilitating dual careers by improving resistance to chronic stress}, series = {European journal of sport science : official journal of the European College of Sport Science}, volume = {18}, journal = {European journal of sport science : official journal of the European College of Sport Science}, number = {1}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1746-1391}, doi = {10.1080/17461391.2017.1407363}, pages = {112 -- 122}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The starting point of this contribution is the potential risk to health and performance from the combination of elite sporting careers with the pursuit of education. In European sport science and politics, structural measures to promote dual careers in elite sports have been discussed increasingly of late. In addition to organisational measures, there are calls for educational-psychological intervention programmes supporting the successful management of dual careers at the individual level. This paper presents an appropriate intervention programme and its evaluation: stress-resistance training for elite athletes (SRT-EA). It comprises 10 units, each lasting 90 minutes. It is intended for athletes and aims to improve their resistance to chronic stress. The evaluation was carried out in a quasi-experimental design, with three points of measurement (baseline, immediately after, and three months after) and two non-randomised groups: an intervention group (n=128) and an untreated control group (n=117). Participants were between 13 and 20 years of age (53.5\% male) and represented various Olympic sports. Outcome variables were assessed with questionnaires. Significant short- and mid-term intervention effects were explored. The intervention increased stress-related knowledge, general self-efficacy, and stress sensitivity. Chronic stress level, stress symptoms, and stress reactivity were reduced. In line with the intention of the intervention, the results showed short- and mid-term, small to medium-sized effects. Accordingly, separate measurements at the end of the intervention and three months later showed mostly positive subjective experiences. Thus, the results reinforce the hope that educational-psychological stress-management interventions can support dual careers.}, language = {en} } @article{AlbertOwolabiGebeletal.2020, author = {Albert, Justin Amadeus and Owolabi, Victor and Gebel, Arnd and Brahms, Clemens Markus and Granacher, Urs and Arnrich, Bert}, title = {Evaluation of the Pose Tracking Performance of the Azure Kinect and Kinect v2 for Gait Analysis in Comparison with a Gold Standard}, series = {Sensors}, volume = {20}, journal = {Sensors}, number = {18}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {1424-8220}, doi = {10.3390/s20185104}, pages = {22}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Gait analysis is an important tool for the early detection of neurological diseases and for the assessment of risk of falling in elderly people. The availability of low-cost camera hardware on the market today and recent advances in Machine Learning enable a wide range of clinical and health-related applications, such as patient monitoring or exercise recognition at home. In this study, we evaluated the motion tracking performance of the latest generation of the Microsoft Kinect camera, Azure Kinect, compared to its predecessor Kinect v2 in terms of treadmill walking using a gold standard Vicon multi-camera motion capturing system and the 39 marker Plug-in Gait model. Five young and healthy subjects walked on a treadmill at three different velocities while data were recorded simultaneously with all three camera systems. An easy-to-administer camera calibration method developed here was used to spatially align the 3D skeleton data from both Kinect cameras and the Vicon system. With this calibration, the spatial agreement of joint positions between the two Kinect cameras and the reference system was evaluated. In addition, we compared the accuracy of certain spatio-temporal gait parameters, i.e., step length, step time, step width, and stride time calculated from the Kinect data, with the gold standard system. Our results showed that the improved hardware and the motion tracking algorithm of the Azure Kinect camera led to a significantly higher accuracy of the spatial gait parameters than the predecessor Kinect v2, while no significant differences were found between the temporal parameters. Furthermore, we explain in detail how this experimental setup could be used to continuously monitor the progress during gait rehabilitation in older people.}, language = {en} } @article{GhahremaniGiese2020, author = {Ghahremani, Sona and Giese, Holger}, title = {Evaluation of self-healing systems}, series = {Computers}, volume = {9}, journal = {Computers}, number = {1}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2073-431X}, doi = {10.3390/computers9010016}, pages = {32}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Evaluating the performance of self-adaptive systems is challenging due to their interactions with often highly dynamic environments. In the specific case of self-healing systems, the performance evaluations of self-healing approaches and their parameter tuning rely on the considered characteristics of failure occurrences and the resulting interactions with the self-healing actions. In this paper, we first study the state-of-the-art for evaluating the performances of self-healing systems by means of a systematic literature review. We provide a classification of different input types for such systems and analyse the limitations of each input type. A main finding is that the employed inputs are often not sophisticated regarding the considered characteristics for failure occurrences. To further study the impact of the identified limitations, we present experiments demonstrating that wrong assumptions regarding the characteristics of the failure occurrences can result in large performance prediction errors, disadvantageous design-time decisions concerning the selection of alternative self-healing approaches, and disadvantageous deployment-time decisions concerning parameter tuning. Furthermore, the experiments indicate that employing multiple alternative input characteristics can help with reducing the risk of premature disadvantageous design-time decisions.}, language = {en} } @article{WilsonGuivarchKriegleretal.2021, author = {Wilson, Charlie and Guivarch, C{\´e}line and Kriegler, Elmar and van Ruijven, Bas and van Vuuren, Detlef P. and Krey, Volker and Schwanitz, Valeria Jana and Thompson, Erica L.}, title = {Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation}, series = {Climatic change}, volume = {166}, journal = {Climatic change}, number = {1-2}, publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0165-0009}, doi = {10.1007/s10584-021-03099-9}, pages = {22}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Process-based integrated assessment models (IAMs) project long-term transformation pathways in energy and land-use systems under what-if assumptions. IAM evaluation is necessary to improve the models' usefulness as scientific tools applicable in the complex and contested domain of climate change mitigation. We contribute the first comprehensive synthesis of process-based IAM evaluation research, drawing on a wide range of examples across six different evaluation methods including historical simulations, stylised facts, and model diagnostics. For each evaluation method, we identify progress and milestones to date, and draw out lessons learnt as well as challenges remaining. We find that each evaluation method has distinctive strengths, as well as constraints on its application. We use these insights to propose a systematic evaluation framework combining multiple methods to establish the appropriateness, interpretability, credibility, and relevance of process-based IAMs as useful scientific tools for informing climate policy. We also set out a programme of evaluation research to be mainstreamed both within and outside the IAM community.}, language = {en} } @article{KlattNoelMusculusetal.2019, author = {Klatt, Stefanie and Noel, Benjamin and Musculus, Lisa and Werner, Karsten and Laborde, Sylvain and Lopes, Mariana Calabria and Greco, Pablo J. and Memmert, Daniel and Raab, Markus}, title = {Creative and Intuitive Decision-Making Processes: A Comparison of Brazilian and German Soccer Coaches and Players}, series = {Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport}, volume = {90}, journal = {Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport}, number = {4}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0270-1367}, doi = {10.1080/02701367.2019.1642994}, pages = {651 -- 665}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Purpose: The concepts of creativity and intuition have been well studied in isolation, but less is known about their distinctive contributions to option generation in decision making. Method: We examined the relation between creative and intuitive decision making in two studies-one involving coaches and one involving soccer players-using video footage of real soccer matches. Additionally, we analyzed whether this relation is culture generic or culture specific by conducting matched cross-cultural studies in a European and a South American country. Results: In Study 1, results indicate a conceptual overlap of creativity and intuition for Brazilian and German soccer coaches. Furthermore, coaches did not differ in their evaluation of creative and intuitive actions of players of both cultures. In Study 2, we found that for both subsamples the total number of generated options was positively correlated with the quality of the first and the final option and that the quality of players' first (intuitive) option was higher than that of options generated later. Moreover, results indicate a positive correlation between a player's creativity score and the quality of the first generated option for the whole sample. Conclusion: Overall, our findings provide meaningful information regarding athletes' and coaches' option-generation processes in decision making in complex team sports.}, language = {en} }