@phdthesis{Fischer2002, author = {Fischer, Susann}, title = {The Catalan Clitic System : a diachronic perspective on its syntax and phonology}, series = {Interface explorations}, volume = {5}, journal = {Interface explorations}, publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, New York}, isbn = {3-11-017613-0}, doi = {10.1515/9783110892505}, pages = {XIV, 252 S.}, year = {2002}, language = {en} } @article{TrutkowskiZugckBlaszczaketal.2003, author = {Trutkowski, Ewa and Zugck, Marco and Blaszczak, Joanna and Fanselow, Gisbert and Fischer, Susann and Vogel, Ralf}, title = {Superiorit{\"a}t in europ{\"a}ischen Sprachen}, series = {Linguistics in Potsdam}, volume = {21}, journal = {Linguistics in Potsdam}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, issn = {1616-7392}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32485}, pages = {123 -- 137}, year = {2003}, abstract = {Inhalt: 1. Superiorit{\"a}t in einfachen S{\"a}tzen 2. Transitive S{\"a}tze mit Dativ-Objekten 3. Effekte durch extrem markierte Abfolgen?}, language = {de} } @article{Fischer2003, author = {Fischer, Susann}, title = {Partitive vs. Genitive in Russian and Polish}, series = {Linguistics in Potsdam}, journal = {Linguistics in Potsdam}, number = {21}, issn = {1616-7392}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-32457}, pages = {73 -- 89}, year = {2003}, abstract = {The present paper addresses a current view in the psycholinguistic literature that case exhibits processing properties distinct from those of other morphological features such as number (cf. Fodor \& Inoue, 2000; Meng \& Bader, 2000a/b). In a speeded-acceptability judgement experiment, we show that the low performance previously found for case in contrast to number violations is limited to nominative case, whereas violations involving accusative and dative are judged more accurately. The data thus do not support the proposal that case per se is associated with special properties (in contrast to other features such as number) in reanalysis processes. Rather, there are significant judgement differences between the object cases accusative and dative on the one hand and the subject nominative case on the other. This may be explained by the fact that nominative has a specific status in German (and many other languages) as a default case.}, language = {en} } @book{BlaszczakFischer2001, author = {Blaszczak, Joanna and Fischer, Susann}, title = {Multiple Wh-Konstruktionen im Slavischen : state of the art report}, issn = {1864-1857}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-10973}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2001}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt eine kritische {\"U}bersicht {\"u}ber den Forschungsstand zu multiplen Wh-Konstruktionen im Slavischen dar. Das Ziel ist es, die Unklarheit der Datenlage und die Widerspr{\"u}chlichkeit der auf solchen "unklaren" Daten basierten Theorien aufzuzeigen. Inhalt: Historischer Hintergrund (Wachowicz 1974) Einige {\"a}ltere Ans{\"a}tze H{\"o}hepunkt: die folgenschwere Arbeit von Rudin (1988) Probleme: - Das Problem der Zuverl{\"a}sslichkeit von Daten - Das Problem der Relevanz von Daten "Harte" Fakten: - Strikte Superiorit{\"a}tseffekte im Bulgarischen - Obligatorische Wh-Anhebung im Slavischen Neuere Ans{\"a}tze: - "Qualitative" Ans{\"a}tze - "Quantitative" Ans{\"a}tze - Alternative Ans{\"a}tze}, language = {en} } @article{FischerBlaszczak2001, author = {Fischer, Susann and Blaszczak, Joanna}, title = {Diachronic perspective of quirky subjects}, year = {2001}, language = {en} }