@article{GiotopoulosKritikosTsakanikas2022, author = {Giotopoulos, Ioannis and Kritikos, Alexander and Tsakanikas, Aggelos}, title = {A lasting crisis affects R\&D decisions of smaller firms}, series = {The Journal of technology transfer}, journal = {The Journal of technology transfer}, number = {48}, publisher = {Springer Science+Business Media}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0892-9912}, doi = {10.1007/s10961-022-09957-7}, pages = {1161 -- 1175}, year = {2022}, abstract = {We use the prolonged Greek crisis as a case study to understand how a lasting economic shock affects the innovation strategies of firms in economies with moderate innovation activities. Adopting the 3-stage CDM model, we explore the link between R\&D, innovation, and productivity for different size groups of Greek manufacturing firms during the prolonged crisis. At the first stage, we find that the continuation of the crisis is harmful for the R\&D engagement of smaller firms while it increased the willingness for R\&D activities among the larger ones. At the second stage, among smaller firms the knowledge production remains unaffected by R\&D investments, while among larger firms the R\&D decision is positively correlated with the probability of producing innovation, albeit the relationship is weakened as the crisis continues. At the third stage, innovation output benefits only larger firms in terms of labor productivity, while the innovation-productivity nexus is insignificant for smaller firms during the lasting crisis.}, language = {en} } @article{CaliendoKuennWeissenberger2020, author = {Caliendo, Marco and K{\"u}nn, Steffen and Weissenberger, Martin}, title = {Catching up or lagging behind?}, series = {Research policy : policy, management and economic studies of science, technology and innovation}, volume = {49}, journal = {Research policy : policy, management and economic studies of science, technology and innovation}, number = {10}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0048-7333}, doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2020.104053}, pages = {14}, year = {2020}, abstract = {From an active labor market policy perspective, start-up subsidies for unemployed individuals are very effective in improving long-term labor market outcomes for participants. From a business perspective, however, the assessment of these public programs is less clear since they might attract individuals with low entrepreneurial abilities and produce businesses with low survival rates and little contribution to job creation, economic growth, and innovation. In this paper, we use a rich data set to compare participants of a German start-up subsidy program for unemployed individuals to a group of regular founders who started from non-unemployment and did not receive the subsidy. The data allows us to analyze their business performance up until 40 months after business formation. We find that formerly subsidized founders lag behind not only in survival and job creation, but especially also in innovation activities. The gaps in these business outcomes are relatively constant or even widening over time. Hence, we do not see any indication of catching up in the longer run. While the gap in survival can be entirely explained by initial differences in observable start-up characteristics, the gap in business development remains and seems to be the result of restricted access to capital as well as differential business strategies and dynamics. Considering these conflicting results for the assessment of the subsidy program from an ALMP and business perspective, policy makers need to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of such a strategy to find the right policy mix.}, language = {en} } @article{MazzaGuenther2021, author = {Mazza, Valeria and G{\"u}nther, Anja}, title = {City mice and country mice}, series = {Animal behaviour}, volume = {172}, journal = {Animal behaviour}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0003-3472}, doi = {10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.12.007}, pages = {197 -- 210}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The ability to produce innovative behaviour is a key determinant in the successful coping with environmental challenges and changes. The expansion of human-altered environments presents wildlife with multiple novel situations in which innovativeness could be beneficial. A better understanding of the drivers of within-species variation in innovation propensity and its consequences will provide insights into the traits enabling animals to thrive in the face of human-induced rapid environmental change. We compared problem-solving performance of 31 striped field mice, Apodemus agrarius, originating from rural or urban environments in a battery of eight foraging extraction tasks. We tested whether differences in problem-solving performance were mediated by the extent and duration of the animal's exploration of the experimental set-ups, the time required to solve the tasks, and their persistence. In addition, we tested the influence of the diversity of motor responses, as well as of behavioural traits boldness and activity on problem-solving performance. Urban individuals were better problem solvers despite rural individuals approaching faster and interacting longer with the test set-ups. Participation rates and time required to solve a task did not differ between rural and urban individuals. However, in case of failure to solve a task, rural mice were more persistent. The best predictors of solving success, aside from the area of origin, were the time spent exploring the set-ups and boldness, while activity and diversity of motor responses did not explain it. Problem-solving ability could thus be a contributing factor to the successful coping with the rapid and recent expansion of human-altered environments.}, language = {en} } @misc{Franzmann2017, author = {Franzmann, Simon T.}, title = {Competition, contest, and cooperation}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-402961}, pages = {27}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Although party competition is widely regarded as an important part of a working democracy, it is rarely analysed in political science literature. This article discusses the basic properties of party competition, especially the patterns of interaction in contemporary party systems. Competition as a phenomenon at the macro level has to be carefully distinguished from contest and cooperation as the forms of interaction at the micro level. The article gives special attention to the creation of issue innovations. Contrary to existing approaches, I argue that not only responsiveness but also innovation are necessary to guarantee a workable democratic competition. Competition takes place on an issue market, where parties can discover voters' demands. Combined with the concept of institutional veto points, the article presents hypotheses on how institutions shape the possibility for programmatic innovations.}, language = {en} } @article{Franzmann2011, author = {Franzmann, Simon T.}, title = {Competition, contest, and cooperation the analytic framework of the issue market}, series = {Journal of theoretical politics}, volume = {23}, journal = {Journal of theoretical politics}, number = {3}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {0951-6298}, doi = {10.1177/0951629811411747}, pages = {317 -- 343}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Although party competition is widely regarded as an important part of a working democracy, it is rarely analysed in political science literature. This article discusses the basic properties of party competition, especially the patterns of interaction in contemporary party systems. Competition as a phenomenon at the macro level has to be carefully distinguished from contest and cooperation as the forms of interaction at the micro level. The article gives special attention to the creation of issue innovations. Contrary to existing approaches, I argue that not only responsiveness but also innovation are necessary to guarantee a workable democratic competition. Competition takes place on an issue market, where parties can discover voters' demands. Combined with the concept of institutional veto points, the article presents hypotheses on how institutions shape the possibility for programmatic innovations.}, language = {en} } @article{ThienenWeinsteinMeinel2023, author = {Thienen, Julia von and Weinstein, Theresa Julia and Meinel, Christoph}, title = {Creative metacognition in design thinking}, series = {Frontiers in psychology}, volume = {14}, journal = {Frontiers in psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157001}, pages = {20}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Design thinking is a well-established practical and educational approach to fostering high-level creativity and innovation, which has been refined since the 1950s with the participation of experts like Joy Paul Guilford and Abraham Maslow. Through real-world projects, trainees learn to optimize their creative outcomes by developing and practicing creative cognition and metacognition. This paper provides a holistic perspective on creativity, enabling the formulation of a comprehensive theoretical framework of creative metacognition. It focuses on the design thinking approach to creativity and explores the role of metacognition in four areas of creativity expertise: Products, Processes, People, and Places. The analysis includes task-outcome relationships (product metacognition), the monitoring of strategy effectiveness (process metacognition), an understanding of individual or group strengths and weaknesses (people metacognition), and an examination of the mutual impact between environments and creativity (place metacognition). It also reviews measures taken in design thinking education, including a distribution of cognition and metacognition, to support students in their development of creative mastery. On these grounds, we propose extended methods for measuring creative metacognition with the goal of enhancing comprehensive assessments of the phenomenon. Proposed methodological advancements include accuracy sub-scales, experimental tasks where examinees explore problem and solution spaces, combinations of naturalistic observations with capability testing, as well as physiological assessments as indirect measures of creative metacognition.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Santuber2023, author = {Santuber, Joaquin}, title = {Designing for digital justice}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-60417}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-604178}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {xviii, 183}, year = {2023}, abstract = {At the beginning of 2020, with COVID-19, courts of justice worldwide had to move online to continue providing judicial service. Digital technologies materialized the court practices in ways unthinkable shortly before the pandemic creating resonances with judicial and legal regulation, as well as frictions. A better understanding of the dynamics at play in the digitalization of courts is paramount for designing justice systems that serve their users better, ensure fair and timely dispute resolutions, and foster access to justice. Building on three major bodies of literature —e-justice, digitalization and organization studies, and design research— Designing for Digital Justice takes a nuanced approach to account for human and more-than-human agencies. Using a qualitative approach, I have studied in depth the digitalization of Chilean courts during the pandemic, specifically between April 2020 and September 2022. Leveraging a comprehensive source of primary and secondary data, I traced back the genealogy of the novel materializations of courts' practices structured by the possibilities offered by digital technologies. In five (5) cases studies, I show in detail how the courts got to 1) work remotely, 2) host hearings via videoconference, 3) engage with users via social media (i.e., Facebook and Chat Messenger), 4) broadcast a show with judges answering questions from users via Facebook Live, and 5) record, stream, and upload judicial hearings to YouTube to fulfil the publicity requirement of criminal hearings. The digitalization of courts during the pandemic is characterized by a suspended normativity, which makes innovation possible yet presents risks. While digital technologies enabled the judiciary to provide services continuously, they also created the risk of displacing traditional judicial and legal regulation. Contributing to liminal innovation and digitalization research, Designing for Digital Justice theorizes four phases: 1) the pre-digitalization phase resulting in the development of regulation, 2) the hotspot of digitalization resulting in the extension of regulation, 3) the digital innovation redeveloping regulation (moving to a new, preliminary phase), and 4) the permanence of temporal practices displacing regulation. Contributing to design research Designing for Digital Justice provides new possibilities for innovation in the courts, focusing at different levels to better address tensions generated by digitalization. Fellow researchers will find in these pages a sound theoretical advancement at the intersection of digitalization and justice with novel methodological references. Practitioners will benefit from the actionable governance framework Designing for Digital Justice Model, which provides three fields of possibilities for action to design better justice systems. Only by taking into account digital, legal, and social factors can we design better systems that promote access to justice, the rule of law, and, ultimately social peace.}, language = {en} } @masterthesis{Buchholz2023, type = {Bachelor Thesis}, author = {Buchholz, Pauline}, title = {Die Einf{\"u}hrung des FREI DAYS an einer Berliner Grundschule}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-59188}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-591885}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {IV, 53}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Mit dem FREI DAY wurde ein neues Format entwickelt, welches schulisches Lernen an den globalen Nachhaltigkeitszielen ausrichten und zukunftsrelevante Kompetenzen von Kindern und Jugendlichen f{\"o}rdern soll. Ob es erfolgreich im Bildungssystem implementiert werden kann, wird insbesondere von der Ver{\"a}nderungsbereitschaft der Lehrkr{\"a}fte abh{\"a}ngen. Um sie bei der Umsetzung unterst{\"u}tzen zu k{\"o}nnen, ist notwendig, ihre individuelle Perspektive im Implementationsprozess zu erfassen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird untersucht, inwiefern sich das Kollegium einer Berliner Grundschule mit dem FREI DAY auseinandersetzt. Dazu wird auf die Stages of Concern von Hall und Hord (2015) zur{\"u}ckgegriffen und ein Interview mit der Lehrerin gef{\"u}hrt, die die Umsetzung des Lernformats an der Schule koordiniert. Ihre Antworten werden durch eine qualitative Analyse des Interviewtranskripts ausgewertet und vor dem Hintergrund der Forschungsfrage interpretiert. Es zeigt sich, dass das Kollegium hinsichtlich der Auseinandersetzung mit dem FREI DAY in drei Gruppen eingeteilt werden kann. W{\"a}hrend die erste von Anfang an begeistert und dazu bereit war, das Lernformat an der Schule einzuf{\"u}hren, war sich die zweite zun{\"a}chst nicht sicher, ob sie sich die Umsetzung zutraut. Schließlich gab es auch eine Gruppe von Lehrkr{\"a}ften, die kein Interesse daran hatte, sich eingehender mit dem Konzept des FREI DAYS zu befassen und sich dementsprechend auch nicht an der Umsetzung beteiligte. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung weisen darauf hin, dass Transferunterst{\"u}tzung, insbesondere vonseiten der Schulleitung, notwendig ist, wenn das Lernformat langfristig in unserem Bildungssystem verankert werden soll. Aufgrund des explorativen Charakters der Studie sind jedoch weitere Untersuchungen in dieser Hinsicht erforderlich.}, language = {de} } @techreport{CaliendoRodriguezGuio2023, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Caliendo, Marco and Rodr{\´i}guez Guio, Daniel Felipe}, title = {Divergent thinking and post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, number = {68}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-60740}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-607408}, pages = {58}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Divergent thinking is the ability to produce numerous and diverse responses to questions or tasks, and it is used as a predictor of creative achievement. It plays a significant role in the business organization's innovation process and the recognition of new business opportunities. Drawing upon the cumulative process model of creativity in entrepreneurship, we hypothesize that divergent thinking has a lasting effect on post-launch entrepreneurial outcomes related to innovation and growth, but that this relation might not always be linear. Additionally, we hypothesize that domain-specific experience has a moderating role in this relation. We test our hypotheses based on a representative longitudinal sample of 457 German business founders, which we observe up until 40 months after start-up. We find strong relative effects for innovation and growth outcomes. For survival we find conclusive evidence for non-linearities in the effects of divergent thinking. Additionally, we show that such effects are moderated by the type of domain-specific experience that entrepreneurs gathered pre-launch, as it shapes the individual's ideational abilities to fit into more sophisticated strategies regarding entrepreneurial creative achievement. Our findings have relevant policy implications in characterizing and identifying business start-ups with growth and innovation potential, allowing a more efficient allocation of public and private funds.}, language = {en} } @article{AlerasoulTiberiusBouncken2022, author = {Alerasoul, Sayed Alireza and Tiberius, Victor and Bouncken, Ricarda B.}, title = {Entrepreneurship and innovation}, series = {Journal of small business strategy}, volume = {32}, journal = {Journal of small business strategy}, number = {2}, publisher = {Middle Tennessee State University}, address = {Murfreesboro, TN}, issn = {1081-8510}, doi = {10.53703/001c.29968}, pages = {24}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Both entrepreneurship and innovation play a key role for business growth and economic development and are conceptually highly intertwined. Both fields have received extensive attention that has resulted in a large number of publications. The aim of this work is to provide an overview on the coevolution of entrepreneurship and innovation over the last decades, with particular attention to recent research trends. To track the evolution at the intersection of both fields, we employ a bibliometric analysis, which allowed us to identify the key concepts, the backbone of research, and to provide a systematic classification of main research themes diagnosed including: 1) entrepreneurial innovation and digital transformation, 2) sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship, 3) product innovation and knowledge, 4) entrepreneurial orientation and leadership, and 5) regional entrepreneurship and innovation (innovative entrepreneurship and historical roots). The findings of this bibliometric review are reported in the form of a knowledge graph that represents the results obtained in terms of the knowledge base (key terms), knowledge domains, and knowledge evolution (themes and bursts), based on which themes for future research are suggested.}, language = {en} }