@incollection{RadkeHustedt2017,
  author    = {Radke, Ina and Hustedt, Thurid},
  title     = {In die Ecke Besen, Besen ...},
  series = {Migrationspolitik in Deutschland und Polen ; Herausforderungen und L{\"o}sungsans{\"a}tze in der europ{\"a}ischen Fl{\"u}chtlingskrise},
  booktitle = {Migrationspolitik in Deutschland und Polen ; Herausforderungen und L{\"o}sungsans{\"a}tze in der europ{\"a}ischen Fl{\"u}chtlingskrise},
  publisher = {WeltTrends},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-945878-64-4},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {77 -- 102},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{KuehlingvanKempenGebhardtetal.2010,
  author    = {K{\"u}hling, Matthias and van Kempen, Britta and Gebhardt, Thomas and Hustedt, Thurid and Ruberg, Bj{\"o}rn and Schenke, Ulrike and Peter, Andreas and G{\"o}rlich, Petra and Horn-Conrad, Antje and Reinhardt, Ragna and Walch, Claudia},
  title     = {Portal = Was macht das Schaf an der Uni? Lange Nacht der Wissenschaften},
  number    = {02/2010},
  organization    = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Referat f{\"u}r Presse- und {\"O}ffentlichkeitsarbeit},
  issn      = {1618-6893},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44020},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-440209},
  pages     = {43},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Aus dem Inhalt: - Was macht das Schaf an der Uni? Lange Nacht der Wissenschaften 2010! - Frauen am Dirigentenpult - Diplomaten auf Probe},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{JannDoehlerFleischeretal.2005,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and D{\"o}hler, Marian and Fleischer, Julia and Hustedt, Thurid and Tiessen, Jan},
  title     = {Regierungsorganisation als Institutionenpolitik: ein westeurop{\"a}ischer Vergleich : Antrag auf F{\"o}rderung eines Forschungsprojektes im Normalverfahren der DFG},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-937786-30-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8283},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {46},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {Gegenstand ist die Regierungsorganisation in f{\"u}nf westeurop{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern, die seit den fr{\"u}hen 1990er Jahren durch Europ{\"a}isierung, Globalisierung und die Krise des Wohlfahrtsstaates unter erh{\"o}htem Anpassungsdruck stehen. W{\"a}hrend sich das politikwissenschaftliche Interesse meist auf den allgemeinen Wandel der "Staatlichkeit" oder die konkreten Ver{\"a}nderungen von Politikinhalten konzentriert, wird hier in vergleichender Perspektive nach dem Wandel von politischen Strukturen und Prozessen der Regierungsorganisation, insbesondere der Ministerialverwaltung, gefragt. Ausgangshypothese ist, dass die westeurop{\"a}ischen Regierungssysteme auf die externen Herausforderungen mit {\"A}nderungen ihrer "Produktionsstruktur" von Gesetzen und Programmen reagiert haben. Daraus ergeben sich folgende Kernfragen: Welche Ver{\"a}nderungen der Regierungsorganisationen sind zu identifizieren? Handelt es sich dabei um Ergebnisse einer reflexiven Institutionenpolitik? {\"A}ndert sich die strategische Handlungsf{\"a}higkeit der Regierungsorganisation? Ersten empirischen Beobachtungen folgend l{\"a}sst sich ein Wandel auf drei Dimensionen vermuten: dem wachsenden horizontalen regierungsinternen Koordinationsbedarf, der vertikalen Reorganisation und Funktionsver{\"a}nderung zentralstaatlicher Exekutiven sowie Ver{\"a}nderungen der Beziehungen mit externen Akteuren bspw. organisierten Interessen, Politikberatern und Konsensbildungskommissionen. Neben der Bundesrepublik, Großbritannien und Frankreich sollen die beiden skandinavischen L{\"a}nder D{\"a}nemark und Schweden in die Untersuchung einbezogen werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{JannBachFleischeretal.2008,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Bach, Tobias and Fleischer, Julia and Jantz, Bastian and Hustedt, Thurid},
  title     = {Opportunity and feasibility of establishing common support services for EU agencies},
  publisher = {Europ{\"a}isches Parlament},
  address   = {Br{\"u}ssel},
  pages     = {21 S.},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{JannBachFleischeretal.2008,
  author    = {Jann, Werner and Bach, Tobias and Fleischer, Julia and Hustedt, Thurid},
  title     = {Best practice in governance of agencies : a comparative study in view of identifying best practice for governing agencies carrying out activities on behalf of the European Union},
  publisher = {Europ{\"a}isches Parlament},
  address   = {Br{\"u}ssel},
  pages     = {210 S., XLIX : graph. Darst.},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{HustedtTiessen2006,
  author    = {Hustedt, Thurid and Tiessen, Jan},
  title     = {Central government coordination in Denmark, Germany and Sweden : an institutional policy perspective},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-26-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8135},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {62},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {The paper analyses the processes of central government coordination in Denmark, Germany and Sweden. First it gives an account of the existing coordination patterns, second it analyses changes within these coordination patterns over time and finally it asks, whether these changes can be attributed to an intentional institutional design. To answer this set of questions, we introduce an institutional policy analytic perspective to the study of central government change. This perspective focuses on central actors, interests, strategic motivations and the degree of the actors reflexivity as a promoter of intentional institutional change in government coordination. The empirical analysis shows the prevalence of negative coordination as the dominant pattern of coordination in all three countries. However, country-specific constitutional and political traditions result in a variety of different coordination techniques actually used. The paper concludes by identifying three different patterns of change, depending on the degree of change and the reflexivity involved : "fragmented institutional politics" in Denmark, "policy-driven institutional politics" in Germany and "adaptive and symbolic institutional politics" in the case of Sweden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HustedtSeyfried2020,
  author    = {Hustedt, Thurid and Seyfried, Markus},
  title     = {Challenges, Triggers and Initiatorsof Climate Policies and Implications for Policy Formulation},
  series = {Leidenschaft und Augenmaß : sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf Entwicklung, Verwaltung, Umwelt und Klima : Festschrift f{\"u}r Harald Fuhr},
  journal   = {Leidenschaft und Augenmaß : sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf Entwicklung, Verwaltung, Umwelt und Klima : Festschrift f{\"u}r Harald Fuhr},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-5249-2},
  pages     = {169 -- 179},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HustedtSeyfried2017,
  author    = {Hustedt, Thurid and Seyfried, Markus},
  title     = {Inside the EU Commission},
  series = {JCMS - Journal of common market studies},
  volume    = {56},
  journal   = {JCMS - Journal of common market studies},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0021-9886},
  doi       = {10.1111/jcms.12605},
  pages     = {368 -- 384},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {This article studies the perception of the EU Commission's Secretariat General in policy-making. Recently, research on EU institutions devotes increasing attention to analyzing structures and procedures of decision-making in EU institutions, most notably the EU Commission. Conventionally, the EU Commission is portrayed as a fragmented organization, divided along the lines of staff nationality, sectoral responsibilities and cabinets and General Directorates (DGs). The Secretariat General has long been viewed a weak actor that is hardly able or motivated to steer internal decision-making. However, recent research indicates a changing role of the Secretariat General as a pro-active broker and last arbiter. This article studies how the Secretariat General is perceived by the DGs in policy coordination and argues that this perception depends on the pattern of political authority, bureaucratic roles and the relevance and the alternatives prevailing in the policy field. The article is based on data from a survey among Commission officials.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HustedtSeyfried2016,
  author    = {Hustedt, Thurid and Seyfried, Markus},
  title     = {Co-ordination across internal organizational boundaries: how the EU Commission co-ordinates climate policies},
  series = {Journal of European public policy},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Journal of European public policy},
  publisher = {Springer Publishing Company},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1350-1763},
  doi       = {10.1080/13501763.2015.1074605},
  pages     = {888 -- 905},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Through an analysis of climate policy-making in the European Commission (EU), this article argues that co-ordination in the Commission displays the same characteristics as the co-ordination across ministries in central governments, i.e., the properties of negative co-ordination. The article is based on a survey among Commission officials. Overall, the article reveals that a public administration perspective on the Commission proves invaluable to gain insights on how decisions are made at the European Union level. The article contributes to the emerging literature viewing the Commission as an ordinary bureaucracy - as opposed to a unique supranational organization.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HustedtSalomonsen2014,
  author    = {Hustedt, Thurid and Salomonsen, Heidi Houlberg},
  title     = {Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies},
  series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  volume    = {80},
  journal   = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852314533449},
  pages     = {746 -- 765},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}