@misc{AndressDrewsGomezGutierrezetal.2016,
  author    = {Andress, Reinhard and Drews, Julian and G{\´o}mez Guti{\´e}rrez, Alberto and Reich, Karin and Roussanova, Elena and St{\"o}ger, Alexander and Herneck, Friedrich and Schwarz, Ingo},
  title     = {HiN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz},
  series = {HIN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz ; international review for Humboldtian studies},
  volume    = {XVII},
  journal   = {HIN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz ; international review for Humboldtian studies},
  number    = {33},
  editor    = {Ette, Ottmar and Knobloch, Eberhard},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1617-5239},
  doi       = {0.18443/hinvol17iss332016},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-98944},
  pages     = {90},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Inhalt - Reinhard Andress: Ein unver{\"o}ffentlichter Brief Alexander von Humboldts an den Buchh{\"a}ndler Jean-Georges Treuttel - Julian Drews: {\´E}criture (auto)biographique dans l'Examen critique d'Alexandre de Humboldt - Alberto G{\´o}mez Guti{\´e}rrez: Alexander von Humboldt y la cooperaci{\´o}n transcontinental en la Geograf{\´i}a de las plantas: una nueva apreciaci{\´o}n de la obra fitogeogr{\´a}fica de Francisco Jos{\´e} de Caldas - Karin Reich und Elena Roussanova: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Karl Kreil und Alexander von Humboldt, ein wichtiger Beitrag zur Geschichte des Erdmagnetismus - Alexander St{\"o}ger: Experiment und Wissensvermittlung. Alexander von Humboldts Darstellungsmethoden in seinen Versuchen {\"u}ber die gereizte Muskel- und Nervenfaser - Friedrich Herneck und Ingo Schwarz: Friedrich Herneck: Hegel und Alexander von Humboldt},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{BarceloMaestro2016,
  author    = {Barcel{\´o}, Pedro and Maestro, Juan Jose Ferrer},
  title     = {Historia de la Hispania romana},
  publisher = {Alianza},
  address   = {Madrid},
  isbn      = {978-8-49104-418-5},
  pages     = {673},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Los romanos llamaron Hispania a la Pen{\´i}nsula Ib{\´e}rica, nombre derivado del top{\´o}nimo I-sepha-im con el que la identificaron los fenicios; los bizantinos usar{\´a}n Spania para referirse a ella, y con el tiempo acabar{\´a} origin{\´a}ndose el t{\´e}rmino moderno Espa{\~n}a. Esta prolongaci{\´o}n topon{\´i}mica es un ejemplo sutil del profundo arraigo de los patrones de toda clase que los casi siete siglos de presencia romana en la Pen{\´i}nsula proporcionaron. Aunando el an{\´a}lisis del procedimiento de conquista e incorporaci{\´o}n de Hispania en el amplio marco pol{\´i}tico y territorial dominado por Roma con el dise{\~n}o de la din{\´a}mica econ{\´o}mica y social inherente a dicho proceso, Pedro Barcel{\´o} y Juan Jos{\´e} Ferrer Maestro ofrecen en esta "Historia de la Hispania romana" una obra regida por un enfoque tan riguroso como moderno que se ha convertido en referencia indispensable en la materia.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Drews2016,
  author    = {Drews, Julian},
  title     = {{\´E}criture (auto)biographique dans l'Examen critique d'Alexandre de Humboldt},
  series = {HiN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz ; International Review for Humboldtian Studies},
  volume    = {XVII},
  journal   = {HiN : Alexander von Humboldt im Netz ; International Review for Humboldtian Studies},
  number    = {33},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1617-5239},
  doi       = {10.18443/240},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-98889},
  pages     = {10 -- 21},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Der Bezug auf Kolumbus ist ein Gemeinplatz der Humboldtbiographik. Humboldt selbst betont ihn besonders in seinem Examen critique, wo er eine autobiographische Dimension gewinnt. Der Beitrag geht aus literaturwissenschaftlicher Perspektive dem Material und den Formen der Inszenierung nach, mit denen ein Leben {\"u}ber ein anderes dargestellt wird.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Toward a Polylogical Philology of the Literatures of the World},
  series = {Modern language quarterly : a journal of literary history},
  volume    = {77},
  journal   = {Modern language quarterly : a journal of literary history},
  publisher = {Duke Univ. Press},
  address   = {Durham},
  issn      = {0026-7929},
  doi       = {10.1215/00267929-3464841},
  pages     = {143 -- 173},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {As the world cannot be adequately understood from the vantage point of a single language, the literatures of the world can no longer be trimmed to a single world literature in the Goethean sense. This recognition bodes well for the future of philology and of literary production. Through multiperspectival writing, knowledge of life may be attainable without being reduced to a single political, medial, cartographical, geocultural, or aesthetic logic. As a laboratory for polylogical thinking, literature does not represent reality, as Erich Auerbach put it. Rather, it represents multiple lived, experienced, or relivable realities. Whoever is open to a polylogical reception of the literatures of the world can perceive and experience how life knowledge transforms into lived knowledge and how knowledge for survival turns into knowledge for living together. However, literature can be more than it is only if it stays aware of the void, of lack, of privation, of the interminable: aware of the end that never is an end. Such a planetary concept of the literatures of the world offers valuable opportunities to all those who do not fall into the trap of contenting themselves with a supposed abundance of text.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Magic Screens. Biombos, Namban Art, the Art of Globalization and Education between China, Japan, India, Spanish America and Europe in the 17th and 18th Centuries},
  series = {European review : interdisciplinary journal of the humanities and sciences of the Academia Europea},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {European review : interdisciplinary journal of the humanities and sciences of the Academia Europea},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {1062-7987},
  doi       = {10.1017/S1062798715000630},
  pages     = {285 -- 296},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Garcilaso de la Vega el Inca, for several centuries doubtlessly the most discussed and most eminent writer of Andean America in the 16th and 17th centuries, throughout his life set the utmost value on the fact that he descended matrilineally from Atahualpa Yupanqui and from the last Inca emperor, Huayna C{\´a}pac. Thus, both in his person and in his creative work he combined different cultural worlds in a polylogical way.1 Two painters boasted that very same Inca descent - they were the last two great masters of the Cuzco school of painting, which over several generations of artists had been an institution of excellent renown and prestige, and whose economic downfall and artistic marginalization was vividly described by the French traveller Paul Mancoy in 1837.2 While, during the 18th century, Cuzco school paintings were still much cherished and sought after, by the beginning of the following century the elite of Lima regarded them as behind the times and provincial, committed to an 'indigenous' painting style. The artists from up-country - such was the reproach - could not keep up with the modern forms of seeing and creating, as exemplified by European paragons. Yet, just how 'provincial', truly, was this art?},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Roland Barthes : paisajes de la teor{\´i}a},
  series = {Serie Monograf{\´i}as transatl{\´a}nticas},
  journal   = {Serie Monograf{\´i}as transatl{\´a}nticas},
  publisher = {Del Centro Editores},
  address   = {Madrid},
  isbn      = {978-84-945505-5-3},
  pages     = {258},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {es}
}
@book{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Writing-between-worlds},
  series = {Mimesis ; 64},
  journal   = {Mimesis ; 64},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-046109-1},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {339},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Der Fall Jauss},
  publisher = {Kulturverlag Kadmos},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86599-327-4},
  pages     = {155},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Hans Robert Jauss (1921-1997), seit 1966 Professor der Universit{\"a}t Konstanz, gilt als einer der bedeutendsten Literaturwissenschaftler Deutschlands der Nachkriegszeit. Mit seiner Konstanzer Antrittsvorlesung »Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft«, die bereits 1967 in Buchform erschien, begr{\"u}ndete er die Rezeptions{\"a}sthetik, welche Ausweitungen in die Sozial-, Kultur- und Fachgeschichte erhielt, und die sp{\"a}ter als »Konstanzer Schule« bezeichnet wurde. Seit der Literaturwissenschaftler Earl Jeffrey Richards 1995 zum ersten Mal {\"o}ffentlichkeitswirksam auf die SS-Mitgliedschaft von Hans Robert Jauss hinwies, entbrannte {\"u}ber die Frage der Konsequenzen dieses Faktums eine Debatte, die nicht abebben sollte. Der franz{\"o}sische Philologe Maurice Olender, der im September 1996 das einzige große Interview {\"u}ber die Vergangenheit mit Hans Robert Jauss f{\"u}r Le Monde gef{\"u}hrt hat, machte in Jauss {\"A}ußerung ein signifikantes »Schweigen einer Generation« aus. Vergleiche mit anderen diskutierten F{\"a}llen wie jene von G{\"u}nter Grass oder Martin Heidegger dr{\"a}ngen sich auf. Vor diesem Hintergrund dient die Publikation von Ottmar Ette der Diskussion von Fragen wie: Wie ist Jauss Verhalten zu verstehen? Welche Rolle spielt es f{\"u}r die Neugestaltung der Geisteswissenschaften in der Bundesrepublik? Sind Leben und Werk getrennt zu betrachten? Oder gibt es doch vergleichbar etwa mit dem Fall Heideggers einen Zusammenhang zwischen Jauss Leben und seiner Rezeptionstheorie? Welche Konsequenzen zieht man aus m{\"o}glichen Erkenntnissen f{\"u}r die Beurteilung eines wissenschaftlichen Werks von internationaler Ausstrahlung?},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {Natur und Kultur},
  series = {Horizonte der Humboldt-Forschung},
  booktitle = {Horizonte der Humboldt-Forschung},
  publisher = {Georg Olms Verlag},
  address   = {Hildesheim},
  pages     = {13 -- 51},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Ette2016,
  author    = {Ette, Ottmar},
  title     = {THINKING THE FUTURE: THE POETICS OF MOVEMENT AND TRANSAREA STUDIES},
  series = {Alea : estudos neolatinos},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Alea : estudos neolatinos},
  publisher = {Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Letras},
  address   = {Rio de Janeiro RJ},
  issn      = {1517-106X},
  doi       = {10.1590/1517-106X/182-192},
  pages     = {192 -- 209},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {This article tries to rethink the epistemic foundations of contemporary thinking. Beyond Area Studies, TransArea Studies point out mobile conceptions of spaces and places. Beyond spatial history, TransArea Studies emphasize vectorial dynamisms and processes able to develop a poetics of movement. Beyond traditional comparative studies, TransArea Studies focus on border-crossing, on entanglements and multiple logics in order to provide a new prospective conception of literature and culture.},
  language  = {pt}
}