@misc{Kuettner2019,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {At the intersection of stance-management and repair},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44348},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-443485},
  pages     = {115 -- 156},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker's insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Kuettner2018,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {Investigating inferences in sequences of action},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam: Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam: Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {161},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-42631},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426310},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that's right to implicitly claim "just-now" recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant's production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants' understanding of oh that's right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semantic-pragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Kuettner2014,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {172},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44536},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-445363},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL.},
  language  = {en}
}