@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(x): Prohibition of physical mutilation},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {419 -- 436},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xiii): Prohibited destruction},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {474 -- 503},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannHerrmann2024,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska M.},
  title     = {Article 1 A, para. 2 1951 Convention},
  series = {The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol},
  booktitle = {The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol},
  editor    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Terje, Einarsen},
  edition   = {Second edition},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-285511-4},
  doi       = {10.1093/law/9780192855114.001.0001},
  pages     = {359 -- 556},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {This chapter focuses on the features of Article 1's paragraph 1 of the 1951 Convention. The article primarily determines the scope of application of the Convention's ratione personae while outlining the basis of the protection of refugees. Additionally, Article 1 addresses the concerns surrounding the inclusion, cessation, and exclusion of refugees. The chapter then tackles the historical development of the article by considering the instruments used prior to the 1951 Convention. It also cites that the Constitution of the International Refugee Organization appears to contain an ambiguity as to how the refugee notion was perceived, so refugees only became the IRO Constitution's concern when they have valid objections to returning to their home country.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannJauer2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora},
  title     = {Legal shades of grey?},
  series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  volume    = {59},
  journal   = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Mohr Siebeck},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  issn      = {0003-892X},
  doi       = {10.1628/avr-2021-0016},
  pages     = {278 -- 299},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {As part of the current process of de-formalization in international law, States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to such secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with, and interpretation in line with, other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannJauer2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora},
  title     = {Possible indirect legal effects under international law of non-legally binding instruments},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3770},
  pages     = {24},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {As part of the current overall process of de-formalization in international law States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with and interpretation in line with other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannNey2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Ney, Martin},
  title     = {Cyber-Security beyond the military perspective: International Law 'cyber space' and the concept of due diligence.},
  series = {German Yearbook of International Law},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {German Yearbook of International Law},
  publisher = {Duncker \& Humblot},
  address   = {Berlin},
  pages     = {51 -- 66},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{ZimmermannOellersFrahmTomuschatetal.2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Oellers-Frahm, Karin and Tomuschat, Christian and Tams, Christian J.},
  title     = {The statute of the international court of justice : a commentary},
  edition   = {2. ed.},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  pages     = {1745 S.},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannSchabedoth2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Schabedoth, John Alexander},
  title     = {Domestic and international criminal justice},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  number    = {57},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3762},
  doi       = {10.2139/ssrn.4087189},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper consists of two parts: In the first part, some of the challenges with which the Internationaal Criminal Court is currently confronted are being presented. First of all, the article will describe the current state of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statue. Afterwards, the article analyses the Court's efforts to deal with cases against third-country nationals and the challenges it is facing in that regard. In addition, the Court's case law will be analyzed in order to determine an increasing 'emancipation' of the case law of the International Criminal Court from international humanitarian law. The second part of the paper will briefly discuss the role of domestic international criminal law and domestic courts in the further development and enforcement of international criminal law. As an example of the role that domestic courts may have in clarifying classic issues in international law, the judgment of the German Supreme Court of January 28, 2021 (3 StR 564/19), which deals with the status of costumary international law on functional immunity of State officials before domestic courts, shall be assessed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannSener2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sener, Meltem},
  title     = {Chemical weapons and the international criminal court},
  series = {American journal of international law},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {American journal of international law},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {American Society of International Law},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0002-9300},
  doi       = {10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.3.0436},
  pages     = {436 -- 448},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannSener2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sener, Meltem},
  title     = {Chemical Weapons and the International Criminal Court},
  series = {American Journal of International Law},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {American Journal of International Law},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {ASIL},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0002-9300},
  doi       = {10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.3.0436},
  pages     = {436 -- 448},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}