@article{ErmolinaTiberius2021,
  author    = {Ermolina, Alena and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {Voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants in health care},
  series = {Journal of medical internet research : international scientific journal for medical research, information and communication on the internet ; JMIR},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Journal of medical internet research : international scientific journal for medical research, information and communication on the internet ; JMIR},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Healthcare World},
  address   = {Richmond, Va.},
  issn      = {1438-8871},
  doi       = {10.2196/25312},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants (VIPAs), such as Amazon Echo and Google Home, involve artificial intelligence-powered algorithms designed to simulate humans. Their hands-free interface and growing capabilities have a wide range of applications in health care, covering off-clinic education, health monitoring, and communication. However, conflicting factors, such as patient safety and privacy concerns, make it difficult to foresee the further development of VIPAs in health care. <br /> Objective: This study aimed to develop a plausible scenario for the further development of VIPAs in health care to support decision making regarding the procurement of VIPAs in health care organizations. Methods: We conducted a two-stage Delphi study with an internationally recruited panel consisting of voice assistant experts, medical professionals, and representatives of academia, governmental health authorities, and nonprofit health associations having expertise with voice technology. Twenty projections were formulated and evaluated by the panelists. Descriptive statistics were used to derive the desired scenario. <br /> Results: The panelists expect VIPAs to be able to provide solid medical advice based on patients' personal health information and to have human-like conversations. However, in the short term, voice assistants might neither provide frustration-free user experience nor outperform or replace humans in health care. With a high level of consensus, the experts agreed with the potential of VIPAs to support elderly people and be widely used as anamnesis, informational, self-therapy, and communication tools by patients and health care professionals. Although users' and governments' privacy concerns are not expected to decrease in the near future, the panelists believe that strict regulations capable of preventing VIPAs from providing medical help services will not be imposed. <br /> Conclusions: According to the surveyed experts, VIPAs will show notable technological development and gain more user trust in the near future, resulting in widespread application in health care. However, voice assistants are expected to solely support health care professionals in their daily operations and will not be able to outperform or replace medical staff.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FredrichBounckenTiberius2022,
  author    = {Fredrich, Viktor and Bouncken, Ricarda B. and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {Dyadic business model convergence or divergence in alliances?},
  series = {Journal of business research},
  volume    = {153},
  journal   = {Journal of business research},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0148-2963},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.046},
  pages     = {300 -- 308},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In this study, we contribute to the scholarly conversation on firm-level business model changes following a neoconfigurational approach. By exploring configurations of business model changes over time, we add the direction of business model changes-namely business model convergence or divergence-as a vital avenue to the business model innovation literature. We identify necessary business model convergence and divergence recipes in a sample of N = 217 strategic dyadic alliances. Firstly, technological proximity emerges as a single precondition to both converging and diverging business models. Secondly, business models between competitors either converge through complementarities or tend not to change relative to each other. Thirdly, equity participation enables business model divergence through co-specialization. We conclude with a discussion of business model trajectories and future research directions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrausLiKangetal.2020,
  author    = {Kraus, Sascha and Li, Hongbo and Kang, Qi and Westhead, Paul and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {The sharing economy},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1355-2554},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438},
  pages     = {1769 -- 1786},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Quantitative bibliometric approaches were used to statistically and objectively explore patterns in the sharing economy literature. Design/methodology/approach Journal (co-)citation analysis, author (co-)citation analysis, institution citation and co-operation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, document (co-)citation analysis and burst detection analysis were conducted based on a bibliometric data set relating to sharing economy publications. Findings Sharing economy research is multi- and interdisciplinary. Journals focused upon products liability, organizing framework, profile characteristics, diverse economies, consumption system and everyday life themes. Authors focused upon profile characteristics, sharing economy organization, social connections, first principle and diverse economy themes. No institution dominated the research field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified organizing framework, tourism industry, consumer behavior, food waste, generous exchange and quality cue as research themes. Document co-citation analysis found research themes relating to the tourism industry, exploring public acceptability, agri-food system, commercial orientation, products liability and social connection. Most cited authors, institutions and documents are reported. Research limitations/implications The study did not exclusively focus on publications in top-tier journals. Future studies could run analyses relating to top-tier journals alone, and then run analyses relating to less renowned journals alone. To address the potential fuzzy results concern, reviews could focus on business and/or management research alone. Longitudinal reviews conducted over several points in time are warranted. Future reviews could combine qualitative and quantitative approaches. Originality/value We contribute by analyzing information relating to the population of all sharing economy articles. In addition, we contribute by employing several quantitative bibliometric approaches that enable the identification of trends relating to the themes and patterns in the growing literature.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrausTraunmuellerKaileretal.2020,
  author    = {Kraus, Sascha and Traunm{\"u}ller, Verena and Kailer, Norbert and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {The dark triad in entrepreneurship research},
  series = {Journal of enterprising culture : JEC},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Journal of enterprising culture : JEC},
  number    = {04},
  publisher = {World Scientific},
  address   = {Singapore},
  issn      = {0218-4958},
  doi       = {10.1142/S0218495820500156},
  pages     = {353 -- 373},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The impact of traits in entrepreneurship has been subject to intense discussion. Apart from favorable traits fostering opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial orientation, venture performance, and other variables, a younger research stream also addresses the role of negative traits. Among them, the dark triad, comprising of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, have gained specific attention. This systematic literature review aims to structure the field, identify current research themes, and provide a better understanding of prior research outcomes. Our results show that dark triad research addresses entrepreneurial activity, opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial leadership, the and entrepreneurial motives. Among the dark triad traits, narcissism is stressed most in research so far. It relates to firm performance, risk, and leadership behavior, whereas Machiavellianism and psychopathy relate to opportunity recognition and exploitation. We also identify several research gaps, which can be addressed in future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KruggelTiberiusFabro2020,
  author    = {Kruggel, Alexander and Tiberius, Victor and Fabro, Manuela},
  title     = {Corporate Citizenship},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {130},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47801},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-478018},
  pages     = {21},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Corporate citizenship, which is firms' societal engagement beyond customer and shareholder interests, is a prominent topic in management practice and has led to extensive research. This increased interest resulted in a complex and fragmented scholarly literature. In order to structure and map the field quantitatively, we conducted a temporal analysis of publications and citations, an analysis of the productivity of involved disciplines, an analysis of the productivity of publication forms including journal impact factors, an author productivity and citation analysis, a co-author analysis, an article citation analysis, an article co-citation analysis, and a keyword co-occurrence analysis. Results of these bibliometric analyses show that corporate citizenship research seems to have been in a phase of stagnation since 2014 and shows a rather low degree of interdisciplinarity. Papers are predominantly published in high impact journals. Authors show little collaboration with other researchers. Current research relates to other business ethics topics, addresses philosophical foundations, and starts to relate to human resource management and organization studies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KruggelTiberiusFabro2020,
  author    = {Kruggel, Alexander and Tiberius, Victor and Fabro, Manuela},
  title     = {Corporate Citizenship},
  series = {Sustainability},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Sustainability},
  number    = {13},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2071-1050},
  doi       = {10.3390/su12135289},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Corporate citizenship, which is firms' societal engagement beyond customer and shareholder interests, is a prominent topic in management practice and has led to extensive research. This increased interest resulted in a complex and fragmented scholarly literature. In order to structure and map the field quantitatively, we conducted a temporal analysis of publications and citations, an analysis of the productivity of involved disciplines, an analysis of the productivity of publication forms including journal impact factors, an author productivity and citation analysis, a co-author analysis, an article citation analysis, an article co-citation analysis, and a keyword co-occurrence analysis. Results of these bibliometric analyses show that corporate citizenship research seems to have been in a phase of stagnation since 2014 and shows a rather low degree of interdisciplinarity. Papers are predominantly published in high impact journals. Authors show little collaboration with other researchers. Current research relates to other business ethics topics, addresses philosophical foundations, and starts to relate to human resource management and organization studies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LogesTiberius2022,
  author    = {Loges, Klara and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {Implementation Challenges of 3D Printing in Prosthodontics},
  series = {Materials},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Materials},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {1996-1944},
  doi       = {10.3390/ma15020431},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The reduction in cost and increasing benefits of 3D printing technologies suggest the potential for printing dental prosthetics. However, although 3D printing technologies seem to be promising, their implementation in practice is complicated. To identify and rank the greatest implementation challenges of 3D printing in dental practices, the present study surveys dentists, dental technicians, and 3D printing companies using a ranking-type Delphi study. Our findings imply that a lack of knowledge is the most crucial obstacle to the implementation of 3D printing technologies. The high training effort of staff and the favoring of conventional methods, such as milling, are ranked as the second and third most relevant factors. Investment costs ranked in seventh place, whereas the lack of manufacturing facilities and the obstacle of print duration ranked below average. An inclusive implementation of additive manufacturing could be achieved primarily through the education of dentists and other staff in dental practices. In this manner, production may be managed internally, and the implementation speed may be increased.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{LogesTiberius2022,
  author    = {Loges, Klara and Tiberius, Victor},
  title     = {Implementation Challenges of 3D Printing in Prosthodontics},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-54402},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-544024},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The reduction in cost and increasing benefits of 3D printing technologies suggest the potential for printing dental prosthetics. However, although 3D printing technologies seem to be promising, their implementation in practice is complicated. To identify and rank the greatest implementation challenges of 3D printing in dental practices, the present study surveys dentists, dental technicians, and 3D printing companies using a ranking-type Delphi study. Our findings imply that a lack of knowledge is the most crucial obstacle to the implementation of 3D printing technologies. The high training effort of staff and the favoring of conventional methods, such as milling, are ranked as the second and third most relevant factors. Investment costs ranked in seventh place, whereas the lack of manufacturing facilities and the obstacle of print duration ranked below average. An inclusive implementation of additive manufacturing could be achieved primarily through the education of dentists and other staff in dental practices. In this manner, production may be managed internally, and the implementation speed may be increased.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{NeumannTiberiusBiendarra2022,
  author    = {Neumann, Daniel and Tiberius, Victor and Biendarra, Florin},
  title     = {Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: a ranking-type Delphi},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {153},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-56672},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-566723},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Wearables, as small portable computer systems worn on the body, can track user fitness and health data, which can be used to customize health insurance contributions individually. In particular, insured individuals with a healthy lifestyle can receive a reduction of their contributions to be paid. However, this potential is hardly used in practice. Objective This study aims to identify which barrier factors impede the usage of wearables for assessing individual risk scores for health insurances, despite its technological feasibility, and to rank these barriers according to their relevance. Methods To reach these goals, we conduct a ranking-type Delphi study with the following three stages. First, we collected possible barrier factors from a panel of 16 experts and consolidated them to a list of 11 barrier categories. Second, the panel was asked to rank them regarding their relevance. Third, to enhance the panel consensus, the ranking was revealed to the experts, who were then asked to re-rank the barriers. Results The results suggest that regulation is the most important barrier. Other relevant barriers are false or inaccurate measurements and application errors caused by the users. Additionally, insurers could lack the required technological competence to use the wearable data appropriately. Conclusion A wider use of wearables and health apps could be achieved through regulatory modifications, especially regarding privacy issues. Even after assuring stricter regulations, users' privacy concerns could partly remain, if the data exchange between wearables manufacturers, health app providers, and health insurers does not become more transparent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NeumannTiberiusBiendarra2022,
  author    = {Neumann, Daniel and Tiberius, Victor and Biendarra, Florin},
  title     = {Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions},
  series = {BMC medical informatics and decision making},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {BMC medical informatics and decision making},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1472-6947},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12911-022-01851-4},
  pages     = {1 -- 7},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Wearables, as small portable computer systems worn on the body, can track user fitness and health data, which can be used to customize health insurance contributions individually. In particular, insured individuals with a healthy lifestyle can receive a reduction of their contributions to be paid. However, this potential is hardly used in practice. Objective This study aims to identify which barrier factors impede the usage of wearables for assessing individual risk scores for health insurances, despite its technological feasibility, and to rank these barriers according to their relevance. Methods To reach these goals, we conduct a ranking-type Delphi study with the following three stages. First, we collected possible barrier factors from a panel of 16 experts and consolidated them to a list of 11 barrier categories. Second, the panel was asked to rank them regarding their relevance. Third, to enhance the panel consensus, the ranking was revealed to the experts, who were then asked to re-rank the barriers. Results The results suggest that regulation is the most important barrier. Other relevant barriers are false or inaccurate measurements and application errors caused by the users. Additionally, insurers could lack the required technological competence to use the wearable data appropriately. Conclusion A wider use of wearables and health apps could be achieved through regulatory modifications, especially regarding privacy issues. Even after assuring stricter regulations, users' privacy concerns could partly remain, if the data exchange between wearables manufacturers, health app providers, and health insurers does not become more transparent.},
  language  = {en}
}