@article{BobzienKalleitner2020,
  author    = {Bobzien, Licia and Kalleitner, Fabian},
  title     = {Attitudes towards European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic},
  series = {European societies},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {European societies},
  number    = {Sup. 1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1461-6696},
  doi       = {10.1080/14616696.2020.1836669},
  pages     = {S791 -- S804},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic affects all European countries, the ways in which these countries are prepared for the health and subsequent economic crisis varies considerably. Financial solidarity within the European Union (EU) could mitigate some of these inequalities but depends upon the support of the citizens of individual member states for such policies. This paper studies attitudes of the Austrian population - a net-contributor to the European budget - towards financial solidarity using two waves of the Austrian Corona Panel Project collected in May and June 2020. We find that individuals (i) who are less likely to consider the Covid-19 pandemic as a national economic threat, (ii) who believe that Austria benefits from supporting other countries, and (iii) who prefer the crisis to be organized more centrally at EU-level show higher support for European financial solidarity. Using fixed effects models, we further show that perceiving economic threats and preferring central crisis management also explain attitude dynamics within individuals over time. We conclude that cost-benefit perceptions are important determinants for individual support of European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HippBuenningMunnesetal.2020,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Munnes, Stefan and Sauermann, Armin},
  title     = {Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Konstanz},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7741},
  pages     = {109 -- 113},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper examines and discusses the biases and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions that are currently being used in many medical, epidemiological, and sociological studies on the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing the consistency of answers to retrospective questions provided by respondents who participated in the first two waves of a survey on the social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, we illustrate the insights generated by a large body of survey research on the use of retrospective questions and recall accuracy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HippBuenningMunnesetal.2020,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Munnes, Stefan and Sauermann, Armin},
  title     = {Commentary zu: Schaurer, Ines; Weiß, Bernd: Investigating selection bias of online surveys on coronavirus-related behavioral outcomes},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Duisburg},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7751},
  pages     = {107 -- 108},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {„Aber gehn Sie ins Theater, ich rat es Ihnen!"},
  series = {Politisches Lernen},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Politisches Lernen},
  number    = {1+2},
  publisher = {Barbara Budrich},
  address   = {Leverkusen-Opladen},
  issn      = {0937-2946},
  pages     = {32 -- 35},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In der Ausgabe Politisches Lernen 1-2|2019 setzte sich Kurt P. Tudyka mit dem Verh{\"a}ltnis von Theater und Politik auseinander. Er gelangte zu dem ern{\"u}chternden Res{\"u}mee: „Der Anspruch, Theater sei die Schule der Nation, - soweit er {\"u}berhaupt noch besteht -, m{\"u}sste aufgegeben werden." (S. 32) In Tudykas Einf{\"u}hrung hieß es bereits: „Eine politisierende Wirkung auf das Publikum wird bestritten." (S. 30) Vor diesem Hintergrund k{\"o}nnte bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern der Politischen Bildung der Eindruck entstehen, ein Besuch im Theater mit Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern sei didaktisch nicht sinnvoll. Dagegen wird im folgenden Beitrag die Auffassung vertreten, dass ein Theaterbesuch mit den Lernenden durchaus mit Erkenntnisgewinnen, seien sie politisch oder {\"u}ber das Politische hinausweisend, verbunden sein kann. Der Beitrag stellt eine gek{\"u}rzte Fassung des Textes „Theater und politische Bildung" dar, der in Markus Gloe / Tonio Oeftering (Hrsg.): Politische Bildung meets Kulturelle Bildung, Baden-Baden (Nomos) 2020, erscheinen wird.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {1960er: Aufwind f{\"u}r die Politische Bildung},
  series = {Geschichte der politischen Bildung},
  journal   = {Geschichte der politischen Bildung},
  publisher = {Bundesausschuss Politische Bildung (bap) e.V.},
  address   = {Bonn},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Zur Jahreswende 1959/60 sorgten Hakenkreuzschmierereien an j{\"u}dischen Einrichtungen in K{\"o}ln und anderswo f{\"u}r Entsetzen und Emp{\"o}rung. Diese Vorkommnisse machten bewusst, was im Verlauf der 1960er Jahre zu einem Politikum f{\"u}r die j{\"u}ngere Generation werden sollte: Die mangelnde Aufarbeitung der nationalsozialistischen Vergangenheit. Diese Thematik sowie der von den USA in Vietnam gef{\"u}hrte Krieg stellten mobilisierende Faktoren f{\"u}r die Herausbildung einer außerparlamentarischen Opposition (APO) in der Bundesrepublik dar, die sich in der zweiten H{\"a}lfte der 1960er Jahre verbreitert. Prof. Ingo Juchler beschreibt den Weg der Politischen Bildung durch die 60er Jahre und die Entwicklung hin zur sog. „didaktischen Wende".},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Zur Mensch-Tier-Beziehung in der politischen Bildung},
  series = {Wie geht gute politische Bildung?},
  journal   = {Wie geht gute politische Bildung?},
  publisher = {Bundesausschuss Politische Bildung (bap) e.V.},
  address   = {Bonn},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Eigentlich leben wir heute im Holoz{\"a}n, dem Erdzeitalter, das mit dem Ende der letzten großen Eiszeit vor etwa 12.000 Jahren seinen Ausgang nahm. Doch seit geraumer Zeit ist in Wissenschaft und {\"O}ffentlichkeit die Rede vom Anthropoz{\"a}n als der vom Menschen bestimmten gegenw{\"a}rtigen Epoche. Mit der Begriffssch{\"o}pfung soll der gravierende Einfluss des Menschen auf die Umwelt zum Ausdruck gebracht werden, der sich nicht zuletzt in der Versauerung der Meere, im Artensterben und Klimawandel {\"a}ußert. Doch wie spiegelt sich diese Erkenntnis in der Politischen Bildung wider?},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kleinwaechter2020,
  author    = {Kleinw{\"a}chter, Lutz},
  title     = {Militante Verantwortungslosigkeit},
  series = {WeltTrends das außenpolitische Journal},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {WeltTrends das außenpolitische Journal},
  number    = {159},
  publisher = {WeltTrends},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-947802-32-6},
  pages     = {68 -- 69},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kohler2020,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich},
  title     = {Survey Research Methods during the COVID-19 Crisis},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Konstanz},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7769},
  pages     = {93 -- 94},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LilliestamMelligerOllieretal.2020,
  author    = {Lilliestam, Johan and Melliger, Marc Andr{\´e} and Ollier, Lana and Schmidt, Tobias S. and Steffen, Bjarne},
  title     = {Understanding and accounting for the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on global learning rates},
  series = {Nature energy},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Nature energy},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2058-7546},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41560-019-0531-y},
  pages     = {71 -- 78},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Learning rates are a central concept in energy system models and integrated assessment models, as they allow researchers to project the future costs of new technologies and to optimize energy system costs. Here we argue that exchange rate fluctuations are an important, but thus far overlooked, determinant of the learning-rate variance observed in the literature. We explore how empirically observed global learning rates depend on where technologies are installed and which currency is used to calculate the learning rate. Using global data of large-scale photovoltaic (>= 5 MW) plants, we show that the currency choice can result in learning-rate differences of up to 16 percentage points. We then introduce an adjustment factor to correct for the effect of exchange rate and market focus fluctuations and discuss the implications of our findings for innovation scholars, energy modellers and decision makers. <br /> Learning rates are a measure of reduction in costs of energy from technologies such as solar photovoltaics. These are often estimated internationally with all monetary figures converted to a single currency, often US dollars. Lilliestam et al. show that such conversions can significantly affect the learning rate estimates.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LilliestamOllierLabordenaMiretal.2020,
  author    = {Lilliestam, Johan and Ollier, Lana and Labordena Mir, Merc{\`e} and Pfenninger, Stefan and Thonig, Richard},
  title     = {The near- to mid-term outlook for concentrating solar power},
  series = {Energy sources. B, Economics, planning and policy},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Energy sources. B, Economics, planning and policy},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London [u.a.]},
  issn      = {1556-7249},
  doi       = {10.1080/15567249.2020.1773580},
  pages     = {23 -- 41},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The history of concentrating solar power (CSP) is characterized by a boom-bust pattern caused by policy support changes. Following the 2014-2016 bust phase, the combination of Chinese support and several low-cost projects triggered a new boom phase. We investigate the near- to mid-term cost, industry, market and policy outlook for the global CSP sector and show that CSP costs have decreased strongly and approach cost-competitiveness with new conventional generation. Industry has been strengthened through the entry of numerous new companies. However, the project pipeline is thin: no project broke ground in 2019 and only four projects are under construction in 2020. The only remaining large support scheme, in China, has been canceled. Without additional support soon creating a new market, the value chain may collapse and recent cost and technological advances may be undone. If policy support is renewed, however, the global CSP sector is prepared for a bright future.},
  language  = {en}
}