@article{Albertini2012,
  author    = {Albertini, Francesca Yardenit},
  title     = {Peace and war in Moses Maimonides and Immanuel Kant a comparative study},
  series = {The journal of Jewish thought \& philosophy},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {The journal of Jewish thought \& philosophy},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Brill},
  address   = {Leiden},
  issn      = {1053-699X},
  doi       = {10.1163/1477285X-12341238},
  pages     = {183 -- 198},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Francesca Y. Albertini (1974-2011) compares Maimonides' idea of peace, as developed in MT Sefer shofetim (Book of Judges), with Kant's work on the notion of "eternal peace" (Zum ewigen Frieden). Both authors develop a historical vision pointed against the use of force and war in light of a framework not limited by historical time (messianic age, eternity). Despite all differences in method and historical context, the authors agree on the notion that universal ethics provides the basis of a determination of right grounded in the will. Maimonides' universal messianism as well as Kant's universal history emphasize the pivotal role and decisive responsibility of the human being in realizing, through reason, the reign of peace and prosperity on earth first envisioned by the biblical prophets. These utopias continue to challenge us, especially in this day and age.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RuppelLeib2022,
  author    = {Ruppel, Samantha and Leib, Julia},
  title     = {Same but different},
  series = {Peacebuilding},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Peacebuilding},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2164-7259},
  doi       = {10.1080/21647259.2022.2027152},
  pages     = {470 -- 505},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The peace processes in Liberia and Sierra Leone share similar contexts and have an interrelated history. They are also often portrayed as successful cases of peacebuilding. This conclusion seems valid, as war has not returned, and political power was handed over peacefully; however, both cases differ with regard to the inclusiveness of the peace processes and the role of local leaders. This article aims to add to the critical peacebuilding debate by focusing on local perceptions about the position of local leaders in these two peace processes. We conducted a public opinion survey in five regions in Sierra Leone and Liberia and expert interviews with peacebuilding actors to examine changing perceptions about the roles of local leaders in both countries. This article speaks to the broader peacebuilding debate by highlighting the importance of including local voices in the peace process and by discussing challenges of inclusive peacebuilding.},
  language  = {en}
}