@phdthesis{Yos2016,
  author    = {Yos, Roman},
  title     = {Der junge Habermas},
  series = {Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft ; 2278},
  journal   = {Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft ; 2278},
  publisher = {Suhrkamp},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-518-29878-7},
  pages     = {521},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Roman Yos' Untersuchung {\"u}ber die Urspr{\"u}nge eines der einflussreichsten Werke der j{\"u}ngeren Geistesgeschichte zeigt auf originelle Weise, wie J{\"u}rgen Habermas seine bereits in jungen Jahren ausgepr{\"a}gten philosophisch-politischen Denkmotive allm{\"a}hlich in die Bahnen eines tragf{\"a}higen Systems {\"u}berf{\"u}hrte. Diese Entwicklung l{\"a}sst sich als ein Lernprozess begreifen, in dessen Verlauf kontr{\"a}re intellektuelle Einfl{\"u}sse aufeinandertrafen und der aufw{\"a}ndigen Vermittlung bedurften. Yos rekonstruiert die spannungsreiche Entstehung von Habermas' Denken aus dem Zusammenhang fr{\"u}hester Schriften und gibt zugleich einen Einblick in deren zeit- und ideengeschichtliche Hintergr{\"u}nde.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MuellerDoohmYos2018,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller-Doohm, Stefan and Yos, Roman},
  title     = {Fatale Orthodoxie},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {66},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2018-0056},
  pages     = {788 -- 801},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Our reply to Fabian Freyenhagen's article "Was ist orthodoxe Kritische Theorie?" (DZPhil 65.3 [2017], 456-469) raises the question whether his proposal that Critical Theory only "be adequately and appropriately critical" without a program of justification spares the search for any general criteria. Answering negatively we conversely want to recall, particularly with regard to Horkheimers's and Adornos's Dialectic of Enlightment as well as Habermas's concept of an emancipatory interest, that such a criterion as a normative foundation of critique is crucial not only for systematical purposes, but also recognised as necessary in this respect by Adorno, who Freyenhagen wants to play off against programs of justification. Critical Theory needs to be clear in this respect. Against this background we are questioning Freyenhagen's recourse to an "interest in abolishing social injustice" as the "only criterion for Critical Theory." Because Freyenhagen ignores the fact that Critical Theory has been understood by its representatives in a twofold manner - as a theoretical program of justification for one and secondly as a cultural diagnosis - his plea for an orthodox Critical Theory is endangered by decisionism.},
  language  = {de}
}