@misc{Piper2015, author = {Piper, Ernst}, title = {Alfred Rosenberg. The Diaries of 1934-1944}, series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichtswissenschaft}, volume = {63}, journal = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichtswissenschaft}, number = {7-8}, publisher = {Metropol-Verl.}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0044-2828}, pages = {705 -- 707}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{DiekmannMuellerHeinkenetal.2015, author = {Diekmann, Martin and M{\"u}ller, Josef and Heinken, Thilo and Dupre, Cecilia}, title = {Survey and statistical analysis of plant reintroductions in Germany}, series = {Tuexenia : Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft}, journal = {Tuexenia : Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft}, number = {35}, publisher = {Floristisch-Soziologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {0722-494X}, pages = {249 -- 265}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Aim - Plant reintroductions and other forms of targeted species translocations will in the future gain growing importance for nature conservation. In fragmented habitats, species reintroductions offer one of the most efficient tools for preserving or restoring plant diversity. In our study, we have compiled available data about plant reintroduction projects in Germany to answer the following questions: (1) What are the characteristics, habitat preferences and ecological strategies of species considered in plant reintroduction trials, and are these representative of the entire class of threatened species in Germany? (2) Is the judgment of the success or failure of plant reintroductions biased by the choice of species used in the experiments? (3) Do reintroduction efforts focus on those species for which Germany has a particularly high responsibility for conservation? Methods - Information about reintroduction projects in Germany were obtained from published and internet sources as well as unpublished reports. In our search we focused on single-species trials in the framework of scientific or conservation projects. For all threatened species included in our database, we compiled information on their systematics, life form, ecological strategies and habitat preferences. A list of all species being threatened nationally or regionally, comprising both reintroduced and not reintroduced species, served as a reference for statistical analysis. Results - The list of vascular plants used in conservation-oriented reintroductions consisted of 196 taxa. Species of families with large and conspicuous, mostly insect-pollinated flowers (for example, Orchidaceae) were over-represented among the reintroduced species compared to those threatened species not included in reintroduction trials. Species considered were also more often than expected found in semi-natural open habitats such as heathlands and grasslands. Notably, many projects focused on calcareous grasslands, characterized by dry, high-pH and infertile soils. In contrast, species of more near-natural vegetation (alpine and rocky formations, forests) were under-represented. About 25\% of the species that were reintroduced are not threatened on the national scale. Out of 150 species for which Germany has a particularly high responsibility for conservation, only 14 (9.3\%) were reintroduced. For only about 1/3 of all reintroduction attempts, success or failure were documented; whereas the success rate appears to be relatively low in nutrient-poor environments, trials with nutrient-demanding and competitive species were more successful. Conclusions - We conclude that conservation-oriented reintroduction attempts should focus more on species for which the country or a region has a particular high responsibility. Reintroductions, to a larger extent than at present, also need to consider the different chances of success in different habitat types and environments.}, language = {de} } @unpublished{Angelow2015, author = {Angelow, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Latest representations and perspectives on the outbreak of the first world war}, series = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, volume = {135}, journal = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, publisher = {Alber}, address = {Freiburg Breisgau}, issn = {0018-2621}, pages = {569 -- 583}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{Riemer2015, author = {Riemer, Nathanael}, title = {"So it happened that we went to war because we were Zionists, and not: even though we are Jews." Nationalist-Jewish German Patriotism at the Start of World War I as Reflected in the J{\"u}dische Rundschau}, series = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, volume = {135}, journal = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, publisher = {Alber}, address = {Freiburg Breisgau}, issn = {0018-2621}, pages = {412 -- 452}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The following article aims to show how the Zionist movement defined its loyalty to Zionism, Germany, and German culture, as well as its reaction to the First World War. Central to the Zionist movement was the "creation of a home for Jewish people secured by public law." This is why superficial examinations assume that for Zionists the conflicts of the European powers were important only as they affected the pursuit of their own political agendas, an impression intensified by their posture of reserve towards military service. Crucial for Zionist positions on the First World War are the discourses revolving around the relationship between German culture, patriotism, and loyalty within the movement. This project is conducted with the help of the Judische Rundschau (JR; Jewish Review), which functions as the official organ of the "Zionistische Vereinigung fur Deutschland" (ZVfD; Zionist Association of Germany).}, language = {de} } @article{Brechenmacher2015, author = {Brechenmacher, Thomas}, title = {Jewish history in early modern and modern Europe as a history of migrations}, series = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, volume = {135}, journal = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, publisher = {Alber}, address = {Freiburg Breisgau}, issn = {0018-2621}, pages = {27 -- 45}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The article describes the history of Jews in Europe from the end of the Middle Ages until the aftermath of the Second World War as a sequence of migrational processes. It thereby demonstrates how the migration paradigm can contribute to a comprehensive understanding of European Jewish history during the given period by better explaining the various types of settlement, as well as other central phenomena of Jewish existence, such as inclusion/exclusion, assimilation/acculturation, and anti-Semitism. The article tries to assess the significance of the "religious factor" within the complex interdependencies between so-called "push" and "pull" factors that determined the individual migrations. In most cases, religious motives played only a minor role, while economic factors tended to dominate, particularly in regard to the functions Jews, as members of a minority, were permitted to carry out in the context of non-Jewish majority societies.}, language = {de} } @article{Heimann2015, author = {Heimann, Heinz-Dieter}, title = {Non-Christians during the middle ages and reformation}, series = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, volume = {135}, journal = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, publisher = {Alber}, address = {Freiburg Breisgau}, issn = {0018-2621}, pages = {9 -- 26}, year = {2015}, abstract = {As an example of migration of the Franciscans, this article pursues the effects of their idea of mission: acquisition and transfer of knowledge concerning non-Christians in the communication of missionaries, using the examples of journeys to Mongolia or the encounter with indigenous peoples in the New World (Aztecs). These friars wanted to teach non-Christians rather than subjugate them. The context of religion and migration resulted in a "boom" of inculturation. And the same context shows the way the Franciscans claimed their identity as well as their struggle, how Franciscans connected pastoral care with recognition of the cultural and religious plurality of Christendom. They embodied what it could mean to say: "our monastery is the world".}, language = {de} } @unpublished{KampmannBrechenmacher2015, author = {Kampmann, Christoph and Brechenmacher, Thomas}, title = {Migration and religion: religiously determined migratory movements in history}, series = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, volume = {135}, journal = {Historisches Jahrbuch}, publisher = {Alber}, address = {Freiburg Breisgau}, issn = {0018-2621}, pages = {3 -- 8}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @misc{Schoeps2015, author = {Schoeps, Julius H.}, title = {Jewish experiences and loyalty conflicts in the first World War}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Religions- und Geistesgeschichte}, volume = {67}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Religions- und Geistesgeschichte}, number = {3-4}, publisher = {Brill}, address = {Leiden}, issn = {0044-3441}, pages = {325 -- 326}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{Schoeps2015, author = {Schoeps, Julius H.}, title = {Had Hitler still managed to win at the End? Europe's Jews between Shoa Restructuring and new Dangers}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Religions- und Geistesgeschichte}, volume = {67}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Religions- und Geistesgeschichte}, number = {3-4}, publisher = {Brill}, address = {Leiden}, issn = {0044-3441}, pages = {244 -- 258}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{RoehrigSalzwedelLinckEleftheriadisetal.2015, author = {R{\"o}hrig, Bernd and Salzwedel, Annett and Linck-Eleftheriadis, Sigrid and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Nosper, Manfred}, title = {Outcome Based Center Comparisons in Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Results from the EVA-Reha (R) Cardiology Project}, series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation}, volume = {54}, journal = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation}, number = {1}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0034-3536}, doi = {10.1055/s-0034-1395556}, pages = {45 -- 52}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background: So far, for center comparisons in inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR), the objective outcome quality was neglected because of challenges in quantifying the overall success of CR. In this article, a multifactorial benchmark model measuring the individual rehabilitation success is presented. Methods: In 21 rehabilitation centers, 5 123 patients were consecutively enrolled between 01/2010 and 12/2012 in the prospective multicenter registry EVA-Reha (R) Cardiology. Changes in 13 indicators in the areas cardiovascular risk factors, physical performance and subjective health during rehabilitation were evaluated according to levels of severity. Changes were only rated for patients who needed a medical intervention. Additionally, the changes had to be clinically relevant. Therefore Minimal Important Differences (MID) were predefined. Ratings were combined to a single score, the multiple outcome criterion (MEK). Results: The MEK was determined for all patients (71.7 +/- 7.4 years, 76.9 \% men) and consisted of an average of 5.6 indicators. After risk adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical baseline parameters, MEK was used for center ranking. In addition, individual results of indicators were compared with means of all study sites. Conclusion: With the method presented here, the outcome quality can be quantified and outcome-based comparisons of providers can be made.}, language = {de} }