@article{BangeowRapp2020,
  author    = {Bangeow, Petjo and Rapp, Michael Armin},
  title     = {Beurteilung und Nutzung der 2016 reformierten Psychotherapierichtlinie},
  series = {Psychiatrische Praxis},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Psychiatrische Praxis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0303-4259},
  doi       = {10.1055/a-1045-9801},
  pages     = {135 -- 141},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective This article investigates how aspects of 2016 reform of the German psychotherapeutic guideline were evaluated and used differently by therapists from three different psychotherapeutic treatment methods. <br /> Methods An online survey was conducted with 987 statutory health insurance approved therapists. The questionnaire focused on various innovations in the guideline. <br /> Results There were significant differences in the use of the broadened authority and of specific treatment services. There were also differences in the application for short-term and long-term psychotherapies as well as in the application to extend short to long-term psychotherapy. <br /> Conclusions Elements of the guideline should be evaluated in relation to the preferred treatment method. Aspects related to the psychotherapeutic work with patients seem to be especially significant.},
  language  = {de}
}