@article{DiekmannAndresBeckeretal.2019,
  author    = {Diekmann, Martin and Andres, Christian and Becker, Thomas and Bennie, Jonathan and Blueml, Volker and Bullock, James M. and Culmsee, Heike and Fanigliulo, Miriam and Hahn, Annett and Heinken, Thilo and Leuschner, Christoph and Luka, Stefanie and Meissner, Justus and M{\"u}ller, Josef and Newton, Adrian and Peppler-Lisbach, Cord and Rosenthal, Gert and van den Berg, Leon J. L. and Vergeer, Philippine and Wesche, Karsten},
  title     = {Patterns of long-term vegetation change vary between different types of semi-natural grasslands in Western and Central Europe},
  series = {Journal of vegetation science},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Journal of vegetation science},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1100-9233},
  doi       = {10.1111/jvs.12727},
  pages     = {187 -- 202},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Questions Has plant species richness in semi-natural grasslands changed over recent decades? Do the temporal trends of habitat specialists differ from those of habitat generalists? Has there been a homogenization of the grassland vegetation? Location Different regions in Germany and the UK. Methods We conducted a formal meta-analysis of re-survey vegetation studies of semi-natural grasslands. In total, 23 data sets were compiled, spanning up to 75 years between the surveys, including 13 data sets from wet grasslands, six from dry grasslands and four from other grassland types. Edaphic conditions were assessed using mean Ellenberg indicator values for soil moisture, nitrogen and pH. Changes in species richness and environmental variables were evaluated using response ratios. Results In most wet grasslands, total species richness declined over time, while habitat specialists almost completely vanished. The number of species losses increased with increasing time between the surveys and were associated with a strong decrease in soil moisture and higher soil nutrient contents. Wet grasslands in nature reserves showed no such changes or even opposite trends. In dry grasslands and other grassland types, total species richness did not consistently change, but the number or proportions of habitat specialists declined. There were also considerable changes in species composition, especially in wet grasslands that often have been converted into intensively managed, highly productive meadows or pastures. We did not find a general homogenization of the vegetation in any of the grassland types. Conclusions The results document the widespread deterioration of semi-natural grasslands, especially of those types that can easily be transformed to high production grasslands. The main causes for the loss of grassland specialists are changed management in combination with increased fertilization and nitrogen deposition. Dry grasslands are most resistant to change, but also show a long-term trend towards an increase in more mesotrophic species.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DiekmannMuellerHeinkenetal.2015,
  author    = {Diekmann, Martin and M{\"u}ller, Josef and Heinken, Thilo and Dupre, Cecilia},
  title     = {Survey and statistical analysis of plant reintroductions in Germany},
  series = {Tuexenia : Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft},
  journal   = {Tuexenia : Mitteilungen der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft},
  number    = {35},
  publisher = {Floristisch-Soziologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {0722-494X},
  pages     = {249 -- 265},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Aim - Plant reintroductions and other forms of targeted species translocations will in the future gain growing importance for nature conservation. In fragmented habitats, species reintroductions offer one of the most efficient tools for preserving or restoring plant diversity. In our study, we have compiled available data about plant reintroduction projects in Germany to answer the following questions: (1) What are the characteristics, habitat preferences and ecological strategies of species considered in plant reintroduction trials, and are these representative of the entire class of threatened species in Germany? (2) Is the judgment of the success or failure of plant reintroductions biased by the choice of species used in the experiments? (3) Do reintroduction efforts focus on those species for which Germany has a particularly high responsibility for conservation? Methods - Information about reintroduction projects in Germany were obtained from published and internet sources as well as unpublished reports. In our search we focused on single-species trials in the framework of scientific or conservation projects. For all threatened species included in our database, we compiled information on their systematics, life form, ecological strategies and habitat preferences. A list of all species being threatened nationally or regionally, comprising both reintroduced and not reintroduced species, served as a reference for statistical analysis. Results - The list of vascular plants used in conservation-oriented reintroductions consisted of 196 taxa. Species of families with large and conspicuous, mostly insect-pollinated flowers (for example, Orchidaceae) were over-represented among the reintroduced species compared to those threatened species not included in reintroduction trials. Species considered were also more often than expected found in semi-natural open habitats such as heathlands and grasslands. Notably, many projects focused on calcareous grasslands, characterized by dry, high-pH and infertile soils. In contrast, species of more near-natural vegetation (alpine and rocky formations, forests) were under-represented. About 25\% of the species that were reintroduced are not threatened on the national scale. Out of 150 species for which Germany has a particularly high responsibility for conservation, only 14 (9.3\%) were reintroduced. For only about 1/3 of all reintroduction attempts, success or failure were documented; whereas the success rate appears to be relatively low in nutrient-poor environments, trials with nutrient-demanding and competitive species were more successful. Conclusions - We conclude that conservation-oriented reintroduction attempts should focus more on species for which the country or a region has a particular high responsibility. Reintroductions, to a larger extent than at present, also need to consider the different chances of success in different habitat types and environments.},
  language  = {de}
}