@article{Malesza2021,
  author    = {Malesza, Marta},
  title     = {The reduced discounting inventory},
  series = {Current psychology},
  volume    = {40},
  journal   = {Current psychology},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1046-1310},
  pages     = {545 -- 552},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In two studies, the aim of this research was to develop and validate a Polish version of the reduced Discounting Inventory. In Study 1 (N = 623) items extraction from the 48-item DI was based upon item-total correlation and items with highest coefficients were considered. The reduced Discounting Inventory resulted in sixteen items. Cronbach's a coefficient was .78, and the item-total correlations ranged between .59 and .77. The correlation between Polish versions of reduced Discounting Inventory and longer 48-item Discounting Inventory was .85. Next, the reduced Discounting Inventory was evaluated in terms of factorial and construct validity. The structure of the instrument was analysed by Confirmatory Factor Analyses procedure. It indicated that the four-factor structure had the best fit to the data. Additionally, we show that this reduced Discounting Inventory closely parallels the longer 48-item inventory its relation to traditional discounting measures using pairs of hypothetical choices (expect for the delay discounting subscale). Finally, in study 2, the test-retest reliability of the reduced Discounting Inventory over a 3-month interval was assessed (247 subjects of the 623 individuals who participated in Study 1). Results indicated good stability of the reduced measure (>= .88). It is concluded that the reduced Discounting Inventory has notable psychometric properties and that it can serve as an alternative measure of discounting when situations do not allow the use of longer inventories.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MaleszaOstaszewskiBuechneretal.2019,
  author    = {Malesza, Marta and Ostaszewski, Paweł and B{\"u}chner, Susanne and Kaczmarek, Magdalena C.},
  title     = {The adaptation of the Short Dark Triad personality measure},
  series = {Current psychology},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Current psychology},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1046-1310},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12144-017-9662-0},
  pages     = {855 -- 864},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This research was designed to adapt and investigate the psychometric properties of the Short Dark Triad measure (Jones and Paulhus Assessment, 21(1), 28-41, 2014) in a German sample within four studies (total N=1463); the measure evaluates three personality dimensions: narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. The structure of the instrument was analysed by Confirmatory Factor Analyses procedure. It indicated that the three-factor structure had the best fit to the data. Next, the Short Dark Triad measure was evaluated in terms of construct, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency ( .72), and test-retest reliability during a 4-week period ( .73). Concurrent validity of the SD3 was supported by relating its subscales to measures of the Big Five concept, aggression, and self-esteem. We concluded that the Short Dark Triad instrument presented high cross-language replicability. The use of this short inventory in the investigation of the Dark Triad personality model in the German language context is suggested.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EhlPaulBrunsetal.2018,
  author    = {Ehl, Birgit and Paul, Michele and Bruns, Gunnar and Fleischhauer, Elisabeth and Vock, Miriam and Gronostaj, Anna and Grosche, Michael},
  title     = {Testg{\"u}tekriterien der „Profilanalyse nach Grießhaber". Evaluation eines Verfahrens zur Erfassung grammatischer F{\"a}higkeiten von ein- und mehrsprachigen Grundschulkindern},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-018-0835-x},
  pages     = {1261 -- 1281},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Ein diagnostisches Ziel der „Profilanalyse nach Grießhaber" ist die Testung der grammatischen F{\"a}higkeit zur Verbstellung im Deutschen. Zur erstmaligen Evaluation der Testg{\"u}te wurden 403 ein- und mehrsprachige Grundschulkinder randomisiert drei verschiedenen Testmaterialien zugewiesen: Testmaterial, das die Zielkompetenz spezifisch stimulierte, f{\"u}hrte zu den besten Testergebnissen. Dies spricht f{\"u}r eine geringe Durchf{\"u}hrungsobjektivit{\"a}t. Zudem wurden Deckeneffekte f{\"u}r Grundschulkinder nachgewiesen, weshalb die Profilanalyse nur wenig zwischen den Grammatikf{\"a}higkeiten der Kinder differenzieren kann. Auch die Retest-Reliabilit{\"a}t und Auswertungsobjektivit{\"a}t sind noch zu gering. Zusammenfassend wird die Testg{\"u}te hinsichtlich aller betrachteten Testg{\"u}tekriterien als verbesserungsw{\"u}rdig bewertet. Daraus werden die Empfehlungen abgeleitet, die Profilanalyse st{\"a}rker zu standardisieren und um sensitivere diagnostische Kriterien f{\"u}r das Grundschulalter zu erg{\"a}nzen. Weitere Ziele der Profilanalyse, z. B. die Verbesserung diagnostischer Kompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften, sind in Folgeprojekten zu evaluieren.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RieseKulgemeyerZanderetal.2015,
  author    = {Riese, Josef and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Zander, Simon and Borowski, Andreas and Fischer, Hans E. and Gramzow, Yvonne and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst and Tomczyszyn, Elisabeth},
  title     = {Modeling and Measurement of Professional Knowledge in Physics Teacher Training},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r P{\"a}dagogik},
  publisher = {Beltz},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {0044-3247},
  pages     = {55 -- 79},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {For improving teacher education, there has been an increasing interest in describing teachers' professional competencies and their development in the course of implementing educational programs. The focus of the present project is on modeling and measuring domain-specific and generic competencies that future physics teachers acquire during their university studies. The model comprises characteristics and relationships between physics content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and skills for explaining physics phenomena. Based on the model, assessment instruments were developed and applied as paper-and-pencil-tests and videotaped expert-novice dialogues for measuring the competencies in a large sample of physics student teachers. Trials and validation suggest that our instruments are valid in terms of content and construct validities.},
  language  = {de}
}