@article{WangFritzschBernardingetal.2013,
  author    = {Wang, Jing and Fritzsch, Claire and Bernarding, Johannes and Holtze, Susanne and Mauritz, Karl-Heinz and Brunetti, Maddalena and Dohle, Christian},
  title     = {A comparison of neural mechanisms in mirror therapy and movement observation therapy},
  series = {Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Foundation for Rehabilitation Information},
  address   = {Uppsala},
  issn      = {1650-1977},
  doi       = {10.2340/16501977-1127},
  pages     = {410 -- 413},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Objective: To compare lateralized cerebral activations elicited during self-initiated movement mirroring and observation of movements. Subjects: A total of 15 right-handed healthy subjects, age range 22-56 years. Methods: Functional imaging study comparing movement mirroring with movement observation, in both hands, in an otherwise identical setting. Imaging data were analysed using statistical parametric mapping software, with significance threshold set at p<0.01 (false discovery rate) and a minimum cluster size of 20 voxels. Results: Movement mirroring induced additional activation in primary and higher-order visual areas strictly contralateral to the limb seen by the subject. There was no significant difference of brain activity when comparing movement observation of somebody else's right hand with left hand. Conclusion: Lateralized cerebral activations are elicited by inversion of visual feedback (movement mirroring), but not by movement observation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KirschRohlfKrahe2015,
  author    = {Kirsch, Fabian and Rohlf, Helena L. and Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {Measuring anger regulation in middle childhood through behavioural observation: a longitudinal validation},
  series = {European journal of developmental psychology},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {European journal of developmental psychology},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1740-5629},
  doi       = {10.1080/17405629.2015.1101375},
  pages     = {718 -- 727},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Learning to regulate anger is an important task in childhood development, as maladaptive anger regulation has been linked to a variety of problems, including aggression and social rejection. To assess anger regulation in situ, in a previous study we developed a behavioural observation measure and demonstrated its cross-sectional construct and criterion validity in a sample of 599 children with a mean age of 8.1years. The present study further validated the measure by demonstrating its predictive validity. About 10months after the behavioural observation, participants were asked to imagine two anger-eliciting situations and report what they would do to get rid of their anger. Observed anger regulation strategies at T1 correlated significantly with self-reported regulatory behaviour at T2, suggesting that the behavioural observation measure is an ecologically valid approach for assessing anger regulation in middle childhood.},
  language  = {en}
}