@article{SparenbergTopolinskiSpringeretal.2012,
  author    = {Sparenberg, Peggy and Topolinski, Sascha and Springer, Anne and Prinz, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Minimal mimicry: Mere effector matching induces preference},
  series = {Brain and cognition : a journal of experimental and clinical research},
  volume    = {80},
  journal   = {Brain and cognition : a journal of experimental and clinical research},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {San Diego},
  issn      = {0278-2626},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.004},
  pages     = {291 -- 300},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Both mimicking and being mimicked induces preference for a target. The present experiments investigate the minimal sufficient conditions for this mimicry-preference link to occur. We argue that mere effector matching between one's own and the other person's movement is sufficient to induce preference, independent of which movement is actually performed. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants moved either their arms or legs, and watched avatars that moved either their arms or legs, respectively, without any instructions to mimic. The executed movements themselves and their pace were completely different between participants (fast circular movements) and targets (slow linear movements). Participants preferred avatars that moved the same body part as they did over avatars that moved a different body part. In Experiment 3, using human targets and differently paced movements, movement similarity was manipulated in addition to effector overlap (moving forward-backward or sideways with arms or legs, respectively). Only effector matching, but not movement matching, influenced preference ratings. These findings suggest that mere effector overlap is sufficient to trigger preference by mimicry. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VoigtSchollBaueretal.2020,
  author    = {Voigt, Christian and Scholl, Julia M. and Bauer, Juliane and Teige, Tobias and Yovel, Yossi and Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie and Gras, Pierre},
  title     = {Movement responses of common noctule bats to the illuminated urban landscape},
  series = {Landscape ecology},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {Landscape ecology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0921-2973},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10980-019-00942-4},
  pages     = {189 -- 201},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Context Cities are a challenging habitat for obligate nocturnal mammals because of the ubiquitous use of artificial light at night (ALAN). How nocturnal animals move in an urban landscape, particularly in response to ALAN is largely unknown. Objectives We studied the movement responses, foraging and commuting, of common noctules (Nyctalus noctula) to urban landscape features in general and ALAN in particular. Methods We equipped 20 bats with miniaturized GPS loggers in the Berlin metropolitan area and related spatial positions of bats to anthropogenic and natural landscape features and levels of ALAN. Results Common noctules foraged close to ALAN only next to bodies of water or well vegetated areas, probably to exploit swarms of insects lured by street lights. In contrast, they avoided illuminated roads, irrespective of vegetation cover nearby. Predictive maps identified most of the metropolitan area as non-favoured by this species because of high levels of impervious surfaces and ALAN. Dark corridors were used by common noctules for commuting and thus likely improved the permeability of the city landscape. Conclusions We conclude that the spatial use of common noctules, previously considered to be more tolerant to light than other bats, is largely constrained by ALAN. Our study is the first individual-based GPS tracking study to show sensitive responses of nocturnal wildlife to light pollution. Approaches to protect urban biodiversity need to include ALAN to safeguard the larger network of dark habitats for bats and other nocturnal species in cities.},
  language  = {en}
}