@misc{AhnertDecultotGroteetal.2017,
  author    = {Ahnert, Thomas and Decultot, Elisabeth and Grote, Simon and Lifschitz, Avi},
  title     = {The German Enlightenment},
  series = {German history : the journal of the German History Societ},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {German history : the journal of the German History Societ},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0266-3554},
  doi       = {10.1093/gerhis/ghx104},
  pages     = {588 -- 602},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The term Enlightenment (or Aufkl{\"a}rung) remains heavily contested. Even when historians delimit the remit of the concept, assigning it to a particular historical period rather than to an intellectual or moral programme, the public resonance of the Enlightenment remains high and problematic—especially when equated in an essentialist manner with modernity or some core values of 'the West'. This Forum has been convened to discuss recent research on the Enlightenment in Germany, different views of the term and its ideological use in public discourse outside academia (and sometimes within it).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Miller2014,
  author    = {Miller, Nicholas},
  title     = {Spaces of thought: transnational history, intellectual history and the enlightenment},
  series = {Ayer : revista de historia contempor{\´a}nea},
  journal   = {Ayer : revista de historia contempor{\´a}nea},
  number    = {94},
  publisher = {Asociaci{\´o}n de Historia Contempor{\´a}nea},
  address   = {Madrid},
  issn      = {1134-2277},
  pages     = {97 -- 120},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {This article offers a theoretical overview of transnational history in relation to the history of ideas, a field that certain specialists of transnational history have singled out as a promising field of future transnational research. Recent historiographical discussions within Enlightenment studies are offered to throw light about the actual novelty that a transnational perspective would offer for the history of ideas. Rather than being an entirely new outlook, transnational types of analysis can be understood as lying at the heart of classical, universalistic Enlightened scholarship, a perspective that was challenged according to the fundamental problem of context.},
  language  = {es}
}
@book{Euchel2000,
  author    = {Euchel, Isaac Abraham},
  title     = {Vom Nutzen der Aufkl{\"a}rung},
  series = {J{\"u}dische Geistesgeschichte},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {J{\"u}dische Geistesgeschichte},
  editor    = {Kennecke, Andreas},
  edition   = {1},
  publisher = {Parerga},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  isbn      = {978-3930450589},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {232},
  year      = {2000},
  abstract  = {Isaak Euchel (1756-1804) war nach seinem Studium bei Kant einer der bedeutendsten Vork{\"a}mpfer und hebr{\"a}ischen Schriftsteller der j{\"u}dischen Aufkl{\"a}rung in Mitteleuropa. Die j{\"u}dische Aufkl{\"a}rung, hebr{\"a}isch: Haskala, entstand ab 1770 in Berlin. Diese Aufkl{\"a}rungsbewegung der j{\"u}dischen Minderheit setzte sich f{\"u}r die Bildung und Ausbildung, b{\"u}rgerliche Gleichberechtigung und intellektuelle Anerkennung der Juden in der europ{\"a}ischen Aufkl{\"a}rung ein. Dieser Band vereint in kommentierter Erst{\"u}bersetzung Euchels programmatische Aufs{\"a}tze zur Haskala, seine Prosa, Briefe und satirischen Schriften; mit den seltenen hebr{\"a}ischen Originaltexten im Anhang.},
  subject      = {Euchel, Isaac Abraham},
  language  = {de}
}