@article{Baushev2015,
  author    = {Baushev, Anton N.},
  title     = {The real and apparent convergence of N-body simulations of the dark matter structures: Is the Navarro-Frenk-White profile real?},
  series = {Astroparticle physics},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Astroparticle physics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0927-6505},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.07.012},
  pages     = {47 -- 53},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {While N-body simulations suggest a cuspy profile in the centra of the dark matter halos of galaxies, the majority of astronomical observations favor a relatively soft cored density distribution of these regions. The routine method of testing the convergence of N-body simulations (in particular, the negligibility of two-body scattering effect) is to find the conditions under which formed structures is insensitive to numerical parameters. The results obtained with this approach suggest a surprisingly minor role of the particle collisions: the central density profile remains untouched and close to the Navarro-Frenk-White shape, even if the simulation time significantly exceeds the collisional relaxation time tau(r). In order to check the influence of the unphysical test body collisions we use the Fokker-Planck equation. It turns out that a profile rho proportional to r(-beta) where beta similar or equal to 1 is an attractor: the Fokker-Planck diffusion transforms any reasonable initial distribution into it in a time shorter than tau(r), and then the cuspy profile should survive much longer than tau(r), since the Fokker-Planck diffusion is self-compensated if beta similar or equal to 1. Thus the purely numerical effect of test body scattering may create a stable NFW-like pseudosolution. Moreover, its stability may be mistaken for the simulation convergence. We present analytical estimations for this potential bias effect and call for numerical tests. For that purpose, we suggest a simple test that can be performed as the simulation progresses and would indicate the magnitude of the collisional influence and the veracity of the simulation results. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KlasenPohlSigl2015,
  author    = {Klasen, Michael and Pohl, Martin and Sigl, G{\"u}nter},
  title     = {Indirect and direct search for dark matter},
  series = {Progress in particle and nuclear physics},
  volume    = {85},
  journal   = {Progress in particle and nuclear physics},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0146-6410},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.07.001},
  pages     = {1 -- 32},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The majority of the matter in the universe is still unidentified and under investigation by both direct and indirect means. Many experiments searching for the recoil of dark-matter particles off target nuclei in underground laboratories have established increasingly strong constraints on the mass and scattering cross sections of weakly interacting particles, and some have even seen hints at a possible signal. Other experiments search for a possible mixing of photons with light scalar or pseudo-scalar particles that could also constitute dark matter. Furthermore, annihilation or decay of dark matter can contribute to charged cosmic rays, photons at all energies, and neutrinos. Many existing and future ground-based and satellite experiments are sensitive to such signals. Finally, data from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN are scrutinized for missing energy as a signature of new weakly interacting particles that may be related to dark matter. In this review article we summarize the status of the field with an emphasis on the complementarity between direct detection in dedicated laboratory experiments, indirect detection in the cosmic radiation, and searches at particle accelerators. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}