@article{ThomasLietz2019,
  author    = {Thomas, Linda and Lietz, Christian},
  title     = {Maßnahmen zur Erh{\"o}hung der Sichtbarkeit des wissenschaftlichen Outputs},
  series = {Bibliotheksdienst},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Bibliotheksdienst},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0006-1972},
  doi       = {10.1515/bd-2019-0040},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Die Universit{\"a}t Potsdam hat 2018 zum zweiten Mal erfolgreich am Times Higher Education-Ranking (THE-Ranking) teilgenommen. Hierf{\"u}r wurde erneut das Publikationsaufkommen inklusive der Verbreitung der IDs von Autorinnen und Autoren, wie bspw. ORCiD, Researcher-ID oder Google Scholar-ID, ermittelt. Die aus den Erkenntnissen der ersten bibliometrischen Output-Analyse abgeleiteten Maßnahmen wurden nun hinsichtlich ihrer Wirksamkeit beurteilt. Der vorliegende Artikel vergleicht die Ergebnisse beider Analysen und thematisiert die Entwicklungen und Implikationen seit dem Ergreifen der ersten Maßnahmen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ThomasStadler2017,
  author    = {Thomas, Linda and Stadler, Heike},
  title     = {Die Bedeutung der Affiliation f{\"u}r die Messung des Publikationsaufkommens einer Organisation},
  series = {Bibliotheksdienst},
  volume    = {51},
  journal   = {Bibliotheksdienst},
  number    = {3-4},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin, Boston},
  issn      = {0006-1972},
  doi       = {10.1515/bd-2017-0031},
  pages     = {333 -- 338},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In Vorbereitung zur Teilnahme am Times Higher Education Ranking hat die Universit{\"a}t Potsdam das Publikationsaufkommen im Rahmen einer Output-Analyse gemessen. Es stellte sich heraus, dass die Angabe der Affiliation, welche die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler t{\"a}tigen, eine wichtige Stellschraube zur Ermittlung der Grundzahl ist. Der vorliegende Artikel spiegelt die herausfordernde Ausgangssituation wider.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Sugita2012,
  author    = {Sugita, Yuko},
  title     = {Minimal affect uptake in a pre-climax position of conversational "scary" stories},
  series = {Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Journal of pragmatics : an interdisciplinary journal of language studies},
  number    = {10},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0378-2166},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.012},
  pages     = {1273 -- 1289},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Analyzing pre-climax positions of everyday affect-laden telling activities, this paper shows that particular facial expressions, such as raised eyebrows with an open mouth or jaw-dropping, are the devices which are preferably deployed by story recipients as a minimal uptake to display affiliation, especially in the case of "scary" stories. During the course of conversational storytelling, it is structurally necessary that recipients warrant the tellers speakership. At the same time, a particular affective display-not only in response to what has been said but also to what comes at the climax-appears to become relevant. Immediately prior to the climax, when the teller employs elaborate multimodal cues, the recipient's display of an "anticipatory affect" is made relevant. A particular type of affect signals the anticipation of what kind of climax is approaching. The present paper explores how story recipients accomplish this two-fold task, namely to display alignment with the speaker's role allocation and listenership on the one hand and affiliation on the other. The study argues that a minimal uptake is called for, requiring only a minimal slot in the flow of storytelling and facial expressions that are most likely to fit this slot.},
  language  = {en}
}