@book{HasslerDeneckerFernandesetal.2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda and Denecker, Tim and Fernandes, Goncalo and Neis, Cordula and Hennemann, Anja and Eskhult, Josef and Djubo, Boris and Spitzl-Dupic, Friederike and Pl{\"o}tner, Kathleen and Kemmler, Rolf and Cavaliere, Ricardo and Van Hal, Toon and Wolf, Johanna and Pellin, Tommaso and Swiggers, Pierre and Ehlers, Klaas-Hinrich and Albrecht, J{\"o}rn and Hamans, Camiel and Willems, Klaas and Link, Michael and Agud, Ana and Rajagopalan, Kanavillil},
  title     = {Metasprachliche Reflexion und Diskontinuit{\"a}t},
  editor    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  edition   = {1.},
  publisher = {Nodus Publikationen},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-89323-017-4},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {321},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Dieser Band entstand auf der Basis von Beitr{\"a}gen, die zum XXIV. Internationalen Kolloquium des Studienkreises 'Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft' vom 22. bis 24. August 2013 vorgetragen wurden. Ausschlaggebend f{\"u}r die Wahl des Themas war nicht ein Befolgen des Zeitgeistes, der immer wieder auf die Krise hinweist, die Europa durchlebt und die sich nat{\"u}rlich auch im metasprachlichen Bewusstsein niederschl{\"a}gt, sondern die Absicht, eine von der Feststellung von Kontinuit{\"a}ten in der Entwicklung der Sprachwissenschaft unterschiedene Forschungsperspektive einzunehmen. Krisenzeiten und Umbr{\"u}che f{\"u}hren allerdings tats{\"a}chlich auch zu ver{\"a}nderten Diskursstrategien und Bezeichnungsmustern, die auch von linguistischen Laien wahrgenommen und diskutiert werden. Sprachwandeltheorien spiegeln zwar ein Bewusstsein von Phasen sehr dynamischer sprachlicher Entwicklungen wider, nicht jedoch ein Interesse an dem gesellschaftlich bedingten initialen Moment, an dem anf{\"a}nglichen Ausl{\"o}ser von Sprachwandel. Eine Umbruchkonzeption, die Gesellschafts- und Sprachgeschichte in diesem Sinn aufeinander beziehen w{\"u}rde, wurde bisher nicht entwickelt. ... Viel mehr als dieser lebensweltliche Bezug des Verh{\"a}ltnisses von Sprache und Krise bildete jedoch die Sichtung der historiographischen Literatur der letzten Jahre und Jahrzehnte den Ausgangspunkt f{\"u}r das Thema dieses Bandes. Immer wieder werden begriffliche Kontinuit{\"a}ten, Einfl{\"u}sse zur{\"u}ckliegender Autoren auf sp{\"a}tere und die Verpflichtung moderner Theorien gegen{\"u}ber fr{\"u}heren Ans{\"a}tzen konstatiert. Meistens geschieht dies zu Recht, doch das wissenschaftshistorische Interesse f{\"u}r die Innovation oder auch den theoretischen Verlust, mit einem Wort die Diskontinuit{\"a}t, sollte nicht vernachl{\"a}ssigt werden. Dabei gibt es durchaus immer wieder Behauptungen des v{\"o}llig Neuen in sprachtheoretischen Publikationen, die eine Tradition und die jetzt neue, g{\"u}ltige Theorie, die sogenannte Vorgeschichte eines Theorems und den Beginn der eigentlichen Wissenschaft in Gegensatz zueinander stellen. Doch solche Behauptungen stammen von den Sprachwissenschaftlern selbst, sie dienen meist der Hervorhebung des eigenen Standpunkts und sind keine Ergebnisse professioneller Historiographie.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Ram{\´o}n Campos P{\´e}rez: un te{\´o}rico del lenguaje dejado en el olvido},
  series = {Censuras, exclusiones y silencios en la historia de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica hisp{\´a}nica},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {Censuras, exclusiones y silencios en la historia de la ling{\"u}{\´i}stica hisp{\´a}nica},
  editor    = {Calero Vaquero, Mar{\´i}a Luisa and Subirats R{\"u}ggeberg, Carlos},
  issn      = {1139-8736},
  pages     = {73 -- 94},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Ram{\´o}n Campos was very much influenced by the sensationist views current in French linguistic theory and developed these further, even to the point of drawing radical conclusions. In his opinion, abstraction is solely possible by using words. According to his ideas, articulated spoken language is the essential prerequisite for higher thought processes. Furthermore, the adjectives which name characteristics are derived from nouns. Memory and the formation of general ideas are the result of the "gift of the word" and by no means are actions of the human mind. Sign language, which was accepted in French linguistic theory as a precursor of spoken language, is not enough for carrying out abstractions. The tendency of thought to concretise contributes to the dissemination of abstractions. No dependent or referential word can be understood as the original word. He also developed these ideas in his treatise De la desigualdad personal en la sociedad civil ('On personal inequality in civil society'), where they became the basis of a new ethics of communication. This paper intends to explore the concept of the "gift of the word", which according to Campos is the only instrument of abstraction and analysis. Applying this concept, human thought can be divided into two capacities or powers: imagination and memory.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {'Communicating the past to the present'},
  series = {History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences},
  journal   = {History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences},
  editor    = {McElvenny, James},
  issn      = {2366-2409},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Wendy Ayres-Bennett; Magali Seijido: Bon usage et variation sociolinguistique. Perspectives diachroniques et traditions nationales / rezensiert von Gerda Haßler},
  series = {Historiographia Linguistica : international journal for the history of the language sciences},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Historiographia Linguistica : international journal for the history of the language sciences},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {John Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0302-5160},
  doi       = {10.1075/hl.42.1.11has},
  pages     = {173 -- 182},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Rezensiertes Werk: Wendy Ayres-Bennett; Magali Seijido: Bon usage et variation sociolinguistique. Perspectives diachroniques et traditions nationales, Lyon: {\´E}cole normale sup{\´e}rieure de Lyon 2013, 338 S.},
  language  = {fr}
}