@misc{EnsafdaranKraheNjadetal.2019,
  author    = {Ensafdaran, Faride and Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Njad, Soodabe Bassak and Arshadi, Nasrin},
  title     = {Efficacy of different versions of Aggression Replacement Training (ART)},
  series = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journal},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journal},
  publisher = {Elsevier Science},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1359-1789},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.006},
  pages     = {230 -- 237},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Aggression Replacement Training (ART) is a multimodal intervention for chronically aggressive youth. The program has been frequently administered in a variety of samples in the original form or in modified versions. This review examines evaluations of the efficacy of ART on aggressive behavior and secondary outcomes in children and youth, including modifications of ART and evaluations of the original version not covered by earlier reviews. Method: Scholarly databases were searched to identify 10 articles reporting 11 independent studies evaluating the efficacy ART in reducing aggressive behavior and improving anger control, social skills, and moral reasoning in children and youth. Results: The majority of studies found positive effects of ART on aggression and other outcomes related to anger control, social skills, and moral reasoning. However, most studies were based on small samples, and few included a control group to evaluate intervention success. Conclusions: The studies reviewed in this paper tentatively suggest that ART is an efficacious intervention to reduce aggressive behavior and improve anger control, social skills, and moral reasoning in at-risk children and youth. However, this conclusion is qualified by a number of methodological limitations that highlight the need for further, more rigorous evaluation studies.},
  language  = {en}
}