@article{ZiesemerHuettelBalderjahn2019, author = {Ziesemer, Florence and H{\"u}ttel, Alexandra and Balderjahn, Ingo}, title = {Anti-Consumption}, series = {Sustainability}, volume = {11}, journal = {Sustainability}, number = {23}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2071-1050}, doi = {10.3390/su11236663}, pages = {16}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Transcending the conventional debate around efficiency in sustainable consumption, anti-consumption patterns leading to decreased levels of material consumption have been gaining importance. Change agents are crucial for the promotion of such patterns, so there may be lessons for governance interventions that can be learnt from the every-day experiences of those who actively implement and promote sustainability in the field of anti-consumption. Eighteen social innovation pioneers, who engage in and diffuse practices of voluntary simplicity and collaborative consumption as sustainable options of anti-consumption share their knowledge and personal insights in expert interviews for this research. Our qualitative content analysis reveals drivers, barriers, and governance strategies to strengthen anti-consumption patterns, which are negotiated between the market, the state, and civil society. Recommendations derived from the interviews concern entrepreneurship, municipal infrastructures in support of local grassroots projects, regulative policy measures, more positive communication to strengthen the visibility of initiatives and emphasize individual benefits, establishing a sense of community, anti-consumer activism, and education. We argue for complementary action between top-down strategies, bottom-up initiatives, corporate activities, and consumer behavior. The results are valuable to researchers, activists, marketers, and policymakers who seek to enhance their understanding of materially reduced consumption patterns based on the real-life experiences of active pioneers in the field.}, language = {en} } @article{WewerFischer2019, author = {Wewer, G{\"o}ttrik and Fischer, Caroline}, title = {Wissensmanagement}, series = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, journal = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, edition = {5., vollst{\"a}ndig {\"u}berarb. Aufl.}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-21562-0}, pages = {653 -- 664}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{WegmannEvequoz2019, author = {Wegmann, Simone and Evequoz, Aurelien}, title = {Legislative functions in newly democratised countries: the use of parliamentary questions in Kenya and Zambia}, series = {The Journal of Legislative Studies}, volume = {25}, journal = {The Journal of Legislative Studies}, number = {4}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {1357-2334}, doi = {10.1080/13572334.2019.1697057}, pages = {443 -- 465}, year = {2019}, abstract = {A large literature exists examining the functions of legislatures and the behaviour of MPs in established democracies. But little efforts have been made to observe how MPs behave in new democratic assemblies. This article seeks to address this shortcoming through an exploration of the use of parliamentary questions in two new democracies: Kenya and Zambia. Analysing an innovative dataset we offer one of the few attempts to directly measure legislative behaviour in new democracies. We examine how the factors found in the literature on parliamentary questions in liberal democracies react to this shift of context and to what degree legislatures in these countries fulfil their core functions. Results show that opposition MPs are not necessarily among the most active but that electoral incentives such as the margin by which MPs have won their seats or the number of voters they represent explain the use and content of parliamentary questions.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Weber2019, author = {Weber, Marie-Christin}, title = {Performance Enhancing Strategies in Different Negotiation Phases}, publisher = {Kovac}, address = {Hamburg}, isbn = {978-3-339-10946-0}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {78}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The present dissertation investigates profit-maximizing behavior in different phases of the negotiation process. Over the last decades, research dealt in detail with behavior of negotiation actors with the aim of identifying performance enhancing factors. The majority of those studies focused on behavior within the main negotiation phase. This work, however, considers phases which are, so far, underrepresented in research but show an impact on the negotiation process and outcome. Those phases are the pre-negotiation, the first offer, and the main negotiation phase which is further divided by breaks into several rounds. Within these phases, traits of behavior are analyzed that can be used strategically in order to impact the negotiation outcome. The dissertation contains three papers, each one dealing with a specific strategy within one phase. The first paper investigates communication behavior in the pre-negotiation phase. Content analysis of a negotiation experiment shows that the employment of positive communication elements such as the generation of enthusiasm for an upcoming project results in an increase of agreements on entering a negotiation and also leads to a higher willingness to make concessions. The second paper explores the impact of a semantic first anchor, which does not contain a specific number but only gives a numerical direction, on the opponent's concession behavior and the final outcome. By means of two scenario-based questionnaires and a negotiation experiment it is demonstrated that semantic offers reveal an anchoring effect and lead to better negotiation outcomes. The third paper deals with the introduction of breaks and their effect on the following negotiation process. Therefore, content and outcome of another negotiation experiment are investigated. The analysis shows that breaks evoke a dominant impression but can negatively impact the atmosphere and thereby also the outcome. Finally, the gathered insights are brought together and discussed. The dissertation closes with implications for practice, limitations of the work, and ideas for future research.}, language = {en} } @article{WeberTiefenbacherGronau2019, author = {Weber, Edzard and Tiefenbacher, Anselm and Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Need for Standardization and Systematization of Test Data for Job-Shop Scheduling}, series = {Data}, volume = {4}, journal = {Data}, number = {1}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2306-5729}, doi = {10.3390/data4010032}, pages = {21}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The development of new and better optimization and approximation methods for Job Shop Scheduling Problems (JSP) uses simulations to compare their performance. The test data required for this has an uncertain influence on the simulation results, because the feasable search space can be changed drastically by small variations of the initial problem model. Methods could benefit from this to varying degrees. This speaks in favor of defining standardized and reusable test data for JSP problem classes, which in turn requires a systematic describability of the test data in order to be able to compile problem adequate data sets. This article looks at the test data used for comparing methods by literature review. It also shows how and why the differences in test data have to be taken into account. From this, corresponding challenges are derived which the management of test data must face in the context of JSP research.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Vorholt2019, author = {Vorholt, Dominik}, title = {Konkurrenzausschluss bei deutschen Wirtschaftsverb{\"a}nden}, publisher = {Lit}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-64314-296-2}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {231}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Die deutschen Wirtschaftsverb{\"a}nde geraten zunehmend unter Konkurrenzdruck. Immer mehr Verb{\"a}nde werben um dieselbe Mitgliederklientel und haben einen {\"a}hnlichen Themenzuschnitt. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus betreiben immer mehr Mitgliedsunternehmen eigene politische Interessenvertretung. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht auf der Grundlage des aus der Evolutionsbiologie stammenden Population Ecology-Ansatzes, wie die Verb{\"a}nde mit dieser Konkurrenz umgehen.}, language = {de} } @article{VoethHerbstHaggenmuelleretal.2019, author = {Voeth, Markus and Herbst, Uta and Haggenm{\"u}ller, Sandra and Weber, Marie-Christin}, title = {Wie verhandeln deutsche Manager?}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Konfliktmanagement}, volume = {23}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Konfliktmanagement}, number = {1}, publisher = {Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, doi = {10.9785/zkm-2020-230107}, pages = {21 -- 24}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{TiberiusLisiecki2019, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Lisiecki, Laura}, title = {Stock Price Forecast Accuracy and Recommendation Profitability of Financial Magazines}, series = {International Journal of Financial Studies}, journal = {International Journal of Financial Studies}, number = {4}, edition = {7}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2227-7072}, doi = {10.3390/ijfs7040058}, pages = {8}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In this study, we analyze the forecast accuracy and profitability of buy recommendations published in five major German financial magazines for private households based on fundamental analysis. The results show a high average forecast accuracy but with a very high standard deviation, which indicates poor forecast accuracy with regard to individual stocks. The recommendation profitability slightly exceeds the performance of the MSCI World index. Considering the involved risk, which is represented by a high standard deviation, the excess returns appear to be insufficient.}, language = {en} } @article{Tiberius2019, author = {Tiberius, Victor}, title = {Scenarios in the strategy process}, series = {European Journal of Futures Research}, volume = {7}, journal = {European Journal of Futures Research}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {2195-2248}, doi = {10.1186/s40309-019-0160-5}, pages = {14}, year = {2019}, abstract = {This paper challenges the solely rational view of the scenario technique as a strategy and foresight tool designed to cope with uncertainty by considering multiple possible future states. The paper employs an affordance-based view that allows for the identification and structuring of hidden, emergent attributes of the scenario technique beyond the intended ones. The suggested framework distinguishes between affordances (1) that are intended by the organization and relate to its goals, (2) that emergently generate organizational benefits, and (3) that do not relate to organizational but individual interests. Also, constraints in the use of scenarios are discussed. Affordance theory's specific lens shows that the emergence of such attributes depends on the users' specific intentions.}, language = {en} } @article{Seyfried2019, author = {Seyfried, Markus}, title = {Evaluation von Verwaltungsreformen}, series = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, journal = {Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform}, edition = {5., vollst{\"a}ndig {\"u}berarb. Aufl.}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-21562-0}, pages = {729 -- 738}, year = {2019}, language = {de} }