@incollection{BenderHeine2021, author = {Bender, Benedict and Heine, Moreen}, title = {Government as a platform?}, series = {Electronic government and the information systems perspective}, booktitle = {Electronic government and the information systems perspective}, editor = {K{\"o}, Andrea and Francesconi, Enrico and Kotsis, Gabriele and Tjoa, A. Min and Khalil, Ismail}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-86610-5}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-86611-2_1}, pages = {3 -- 20}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Digital platforms, by their design, allow the coordination of multiple entities to achieve a common goal. Motivated by the success of platforms in the private sector, they increasingly receive attention in the public sector. However, different understandings of the platform concept prevail. To guide the development and further research a coherent understanding is required. To address this gap, we identify the constitutive elements of platforms in the public sector. Moreover, their potential to coordinate partially autonomous entities as typical for federal organized states is highlighted. This study contributes through a uniform understanding of public service platforms. Despite constitutive elements, the proposed framework for platforms in the public sector may guide future analysis. The analysis framework is applied to platforms of federal states in the European Union.}, language = {en} } @article{SalzwedelVoellerReibisetal.2018, author = {Salzwedel, Annett and Voeller, Heinz and Reibis, Robert and Bonaventura, Klaus and Behrens, Steffen and Reibis, Rona Katharina}, title = {Regionale Versorgungsaspekte des akuten Myokardinfarktes im Nordosten Deutschlands}, series = {Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift : DMW ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Innere Medizin (DGIM) ; Organ der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und {\"A}rzte (GDN{\"A})}, volume = {143}, journal = {Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift : DMW ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Innere Medizin (DGIM) ; Organ der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und {\"A}rzte (GDN{\"A})}, number = {8}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0012-0472}, doi = {10.1055/s-0043-123907}, pages = {E51 -- E58}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background In recent decades, guideline-based therapy of myocardial infarction has led to a considerable reduction in myocardial infarction mortality. However, there are relevant differences in acute care and the extent of infarction mortality. The objective of this survey was to analyze the current care situation of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the region of northeast Germany (Berlin, Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern). Methods Based on pseudonymized data from a statutory health insurance of 1 387 084 persons, a total of 6733 patients with inpatient admission at MI were filtered using the ICD10 code I21 and I22 for 2012. Total inhospital mortality and 1-year mortality and prognostic parameters were evaluated and analyzed in country comparisons. Results Both the hospital mortality rate and the 1-year mortality rate of the individual countries (Berlin 13.6 resp. 27.5 \%, respectively, BRB 13.9 and 27.9 \%, MV 14.4 and 29.0 \%, respectively) were comparable to the overall rate (13.9 \% or 28.0 \%) and in the country comparison. In the multiple analysis, the 1-year mortality was determined by the invasive strategy (OR 0.42, 95 \% CI 0.35 -0.51, p < 0.001) as well as by the implementation of the guidelines-based secondary prevention (OR 0.14, 95 \% CI 0.12 - 0.17, p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between the three federal states. Conclusion The investigated population of patients with acute MI in Berlin, Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern demonstrated a comparable inpatient and post-hospital care and 1-year prognosis regardless of the federal state assignment. Referral to coronary angiography and adequate implementation of evidence-based medication demonstrated a significant prognostic impact.}, language = {de} }