@misc{DemmerlingKruegerHabermas2016,
  author    = {Demmerling, Christoph and Kr{\"u}ger, Hans-Peter and Habermas, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Communicative Reason Juergen Habermas, interviewed by Christoph Demmerling and Hans-Peter Krueger},
  series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Philosophie : Zweimonatsschrift der internationalen philosophischen Forschung},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0012-1045},
  doi       = {10.1515/dzph-2016-0061},
  pages     = {806 -- 827},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Jurgen Habermas explicates the concept of communicative reason. He explains the key assumptions of the philosophy of language and social theory associated with this concept. Also discussed is the category of life-world and the role of the body-mind difference for the consciousness of exclusivity in our access to subjective experience. as well as the role of emotions and perceptions in the context of a theory of communicative action. The question of the redemption of the various validity claims as they are associated with the performance of speech acts is related to processes of social learning and to the role of negative experiences. Finally the interview deals with the relationship between religion and reason and the importance of religion in modern, post-secular societies. Questions about the philosophical culture of our present times are discussed at the end of the conversation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HaenelMueller2022,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje Charlotte and M{\"u}ller, Johanna},
  title     = {Non-Ideal philosophy as methodology},
  series = {Theoria : a journal of social and political theory},
  volume    = {69},
  journal   = {Theoria : a journal of social and political theory},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Berghahn},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1558-5816},
  doi       = {10.3167/th.2022.6917202},
  pages     = {32 -- 59},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This article argues that non-ideal theory is distinctive in its use of a certain methodology which is prior to specific topics (such as injustice, oppression, etc.), grounded in the idea of socially situ-ated knowledge, and able to address ideological situatedness. Drawing on standpoint epistemology, we show that one's social position within given power structures has implications for knowledge acquisition and that being in a vulnerable or marginalised position can be advantageous to knowledge acquisition. Following ideology critique, we argue that both marginalised and powerful social positions are embedded within a given ideology. As ideology is more than a mere set of attitudes or beliefs that social agents endorse or resist, situated agents and theo-rists cannot develop normative criteria that are not themselves situated. Hence, non-ideal theory has to be equipped with methods that are likely to make this situatedness visible. We close by presenting some diverse methods that already do so.},
  language  = {en}
}