@article{ZuppingerDingleySchmidChenetal.2011, author = {Zuppinger-Dingley, D. and Schmid, Bernhard and Chen, Y. and Brandl, H. and van der Heijden, M. G. A. and Joshi, Jasmin Radha}, title = {In their native range, invasive plants are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks}, series = {Ecosphere : the magazine of the International Ecology University}, volume = {2}, journal = {Ecosphere : the magazine of the International Ecology University}, number = {5}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Washington}, issn = {2150-8925}, doi = {10.1890/ES11-00061.1}, pages = {12}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The ability of some plant species to dominate communities in new biogeographical ranges has been attributed to an innate higher competitive ability and release from co-evolved specialist enemies. Specifically, invasive success in the new range might be explained by release from biotic negative soil-feedbacks, which control potentially dominant species in their native range. To test this hypothesis, we grew individuals from sixteen phylogenetically paired European grassland species that became either invasive or naturalized in new ranges, in either sterilized soil or in sterilized soil with unsterilized soil inoculum from their native home range. We found that although the native members of invasive species generally performed better than those of naturalized species, these native members of invasive species also responded more negatively to native soil inoculum than did the native members of naturalized species. This supports our hypothesis that potentially invasive species in their native range are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks. However, contrary to expectation, negative soil-feedbacks in potentially invasive species were not much increased by interspecific competition. There was no significant variation among families between invasive and naturalized species regarding their feedback response (negative vs. neutral). Therefore, we conclude that the observed negative soil feedbacks in potentially invasive species may be quite widespread in European families of typical grassland species.}, language = {en} } @article{ZudePflanzSpinellietal.2011, author = {Zude, Manuela and Pflanz, Michael and Spinelli, Lorenzo and Dosche, Carsten and Torricelli, Alessandro}, title = {Non-destructive analysis of anthocyanins in cherries by means of Lambert-Beer and multivariate regression based on spectroscopy and scatter correction using time-resolved analysis}, series = {Journal of food engineering}, volume = {103}, journal = {Journal of food engineering}, number = {1}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0260-8774}, doi = {10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.09.021}, pages = {68 -- 75}, year = {2011}, abstract = {In high-value sweet cherry (Prunus avium), the red coloration - determined by the anthocyanins content - is correlated with the fruit ripeness stage and market value. Non-destructive spectroscopy has been introduced in practice and may be utilized as a tool to assess the fruit pigments in the supply chain processes. From the fruit spectrum in the visible (Vis) wavelength range, the pigment contents are analyzed separately at their specific absorbance wavelengths. A drawback of the method is the need for re-calibration due to varying optical properties of the fruit tissue. In order to correct for the scattering differences, most often the spectral intensity in the visible spectrum is normalized by wavelengths in the near infrared (NIR) range, or pre-processing methods are applied in multivariate calibrations. In the present study, the influence of the fruit scattering properties on the Vis/NIR fruit spectrum were corrected by the effective pathlength in the fruit tissue obtained from time-resolved readings of the distribution of time-of-flight (DTOF). Pigment analysis was carried out according to Lambert-Beer law, considering fruit spectral intensities, effective pathlength, and refractive index. Results were compared to commonly applied linear color and multivariate partial least squares (PLS) regression analysis. The approaches were validated on fruits at different ripeness stages, providing variation in the scattering coefficient and refractive index exceeding the calibration sample set. In the validation, the measuring uncertainty of non-destructively analyzing fruits with Vis/NIR spectra by means of PLS or Lambert-Beer in comparison with combined application of Vis/NIR spectroscopy and DTOF measurements showed a dramatic bias reduction as well as enhanced coefficients of determination when using both, the spectral intensities and apparent information on the scattering influence by means of DTOF readings. Corrections for the refractive index did not render improved results.}, language = {en} } @article{ZolotovProkhorovNamgaladzeetal.2011, author = {Zolotov, O. V. and Prokhorov, Boris E. and Namgaladze, Alexander A. and Martynenko, O. V.}, title = {Variations in the total electron content of the ionosphere during preparation of earthquakes}, series = {Russian journal of physical chemistry : B, Focus on physics}, volume = {5}, journal = {Russian journal of physical chemistry : B, Focus on physics}, number = {3}, publisher = {Pleiades Publ.}, address = {New York}, issn = {1990-7931}, doi = {10.1134/S1990793111030146}, pages = {435 -- 438}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The morphological features in the deviations of the total electron content (TEC) of the ionosphere from the background undisturbed state as possible precursors of the earthquake of January 12, 2010 (21:53 UT (16:53 LT), 18.46A degrees N, 72.5A degrees W, 7.0 M) in Haiti are analyzed. To identify these features, global and regional differential TEC maps based on global 2-h TEC maps provided by NASA in the IONEX format were plotted. For the considered earthquake, long-lived disturbances, presumably of seismic origin, were localized in the near-epicenter area and were accompanied by similar effects in the magnetoconjugate region. Both decreases and increases in the local TEC over the period from 22 UT of January 10 to 08 UT of January 12, 2010 were observed. The horizontal dimensions of the anomalies were similar to 40A degrees in longitude and similar to 20A degrees in latitude, with the magnitude of TEC disturbances reaching similar to 40\% relative to the background near the epicenter and more than 50\% in the magnetoconjugate area. No significant geomagnetic disturbances within January 1-12, 2010 were observed, i.e., the detected TEC anomalies were manifestations of interplay between processes in the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere system.}, language = {en} } @article{ZimmermannOnea2011, author = {Zimmermann, Malte and Onea, Edgar}, title = {Focus marking and focus interpretation}, series = {LINGUA}, volume = {121}, journal = {LINGUA}, number = {11}, publisher = {ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV}, address = {AMSTERDAM}, issn = {0024-3841}, doi = {10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.002}, pages = {1651 -- 1670}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The languages of the world exhibit a range of formal phenomena (e.g. accenting, syntactic reordering and morphological marking) that are commonly linked to the information-structural notion of focus. Crucially, there does not seem to be a one-to-one mapping between particular formal features (focus marking devices) and focus, neither from a cross-linguistic perspective, nor within individual languages. This raises the question of what is actually being expressed if we say that a constituent is focused in a particular language, and whether, or to what extent, the same semantic or pragmatic content is formally expressed by focus-marking across languages. This special issue addresses the question of focus and its grammatical realization from a number of theoretical and empirical perspectives. In this introductory article we elaborate on this question by making an explicit proposal about what we take to be the correct way of thinking about the information-structural category of focus and its formal realization. In the first part, we introduce a unified semantico-pragmatic perspective on focus in terms of alternatives and possible worlds. In the second part, we present a cursory cross-linguistic overview of focus marking strategies as found in the languages of the world. Finally, in the third part, we discuss the connection between the notion of focus, different pragmatic uses of focus and different focus marking strategies employed in the grammars of natural languages. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Malte}, title = {On the functional architecture of DP and the feature content of pronominal quantifiers in Low German}, series = {The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics}, volume = {14}, journal = {The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {1383-4924}, doi = {10.1007/s10828-011-9046-z}, pages = {203 -- 240}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The article investigates the functional architecture of complex pronominal quantifying expressions (PQEs) in Low German, such as jeder-een 'everyone' and keen-een 'no-one', which provide overt evidence for a Num-projection, situated between the NP- and DP-layer. The feature specification of Num as [+lattice] or [-lattice] is responsible for whether the DP denotes into the domain of atomic or mass/plural entities, respectively. In the case of complex PQEs, the syntactic Num-head hosts the overt element een 'a, one', which carries a [-lattice] feature, thus ensuring that the PQE ranges exclusively over the domain of atomic entities, but not mass or plural entities. The Num-head een differs from its simplex counterpart wat 'something', which is analyzed as an NP-proform with an underspecified [lattice]-feature. As a result, wat can range over atomic and mass domains alike. In the final part of the article, it is argued that wat is also underspecified for the operator feature [rel/wh], for which reason it can also function as an interrogative expression (what) and as a relative pronoun (which), respectively, depending on the syntactic context. Throughout the article, the Low German data are compared with relevant data from other German dialects and Germanic and Romance languages, pointing out similarities and differences in the syntactic structure and feature content of PQEs across these languages and dialects.}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Malte}, title = {The grammatical expression of focus in West Chadic variation and uniformity in and across languages}, series = {Linguistics : an interdisciplinary journal of the language sciences}, volume = {49}, journal = {Linguistics : an interdisciplinary journal of the language sciences}, number = {5}, publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0024-3949}, doi = {10.1515/LING.2011.032}, pages = {1163 -- 1213}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The article provides an overview of the grammatical realization of focus in four West Chadic languages (Chadic, Afro-Asiatic). The languages discussed exhibit an intriguing crosslinguistic variation in the realization of focus, both among themselves as well as compared to European intonation languages. They also display language-internal variation in the formal realization of focus. The West Chadic languages differ widely in their ways of expressing focus, which range from syntactic over prosodic to morphological devices. In contrast to European intonation languages, the focus marking systems of the West Chadic languages are inconsistent in that focus is often not grammatically expressed, but these inconsistencies are shown to be systematic. Subject foci (contrastive or not) and contrastive nonsubject foci are always grammatically marked, whereas information focus on nonsubjects need not be marked as such. The absence of formal focus marking supports pragmatic theories of focus in terms of contextual resolution. The special status of focused subjects and contrastive foci is derived from the Contrastive Focus Hypothesis, which requires unexpected foci and unexpected focus contents to be marked as such, together with the assumption that canonical subjects in West Chadic receive a default interpretation as topics. Finally, I discuss certain focus ambiguities which are not attested in intonation languages, nor do they follow on standard accounts of focus marking, but which can be accounted for in terms of constraint interaction in the formal expression of focus.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Linda}, title = {Psychische Gesundheit von angehenden Lehrkr{\"a}ften in der zweiten Phase der Lehrerausbildung : Evaluation der Pilotstudie "Gesundheitspr{\"a}vention durch Coachinggruppen nach dem Freiburger Modell"}, publisher = {Logos Verl.}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-8325-2780-8}, pages = {204 S.}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{ZimmermannDorschner2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Dorschner, Jonas}, title = {Article 22}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 1 A, para. 2}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @article{Zimmermann2011, author = {Zimmermann, Andreas}, title = {Article 33, para. 2}, isbn = {978-0-19-954251-2}, year = {2011}, language = {en} }