@article{TomaszewskaSchuster2019,
  author    = {Tomaszewska, Paulina and Schuster, Isabell},
  title     = {Comparing sexuality-related cognitions, sexual behavior, and acceptance of sexual coercion in dating app users and non-users},
  series = {Sexuality research \& social policy},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Sexuality research \& social policy},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {1868-9884},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13178-019-00397-x},
  pages     = {188 -- 198},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Using dating apps has become popular for many young adults worldwide, promising the chance to meet new sexual partners. Because there is evidence that using dating apps may be associated with risky sexual behavior, this study compared users and non-users concerning their sexuality-related cognitions, namely their risky sexual scripts and sexual self-esteem, as well as their risky and sexually assertive behavior. It also explored the link between dating app use and acceptance of sexual coercion. A total of 491 young heterosexual adults (295 female) participated in an online survey advertised in social media and college libraries in Germany. Results indicated that users had more risky sexual scripts and reported more risky sexual behavior than non-users. Furthermore, male dating app users had lower sexual self-esteem and higher acceptance of sexual coercion than male non-users. In both gender groups, dating app use predicted casual sexual activity via a more risky casual sex script. Gender differences, potential underlying mechanisms, and directions for future research are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KraheBerger2021,
  author    = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Berger, Anja},
  title     = {Pathways from college students' cognitive scripts for consensual sex to sexual victimization},
  series = {The journal of sex research : the publication of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {The journal of sex research : the publication of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0022-4499},
  doi       = {10.1080/00224499.2021.1972922},
  pages     = {1130 -- 1139},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Sexual scripts serve as cognitive representations of typical elements of sexual interactions that guide sexual behavior. To the extent that cognitive scripts for consensual sex comprise elements associated with a risk of experiencing nonconsensual sex, they may be indirectly linked to sexual victimization via risky sexual behavior. A longitudinal study with 2,425 college students in Germany (58\% female) examined pathways from sexual scripts for consensual sex, sexual behavior, and sexual victimization over three data waves separated by 12-month intervals. Sexual scripts and behavior were defined as risky to the extent that they include known vulnerability factors for sexual victimization (casual sex, alcohol consumption, ambiguous communication of sexual intentions). Path analyses confirmed that more risky sexual scripts prospectively predicted more risky sexual behavior, which predicted higher odds of sexual victimization. The findings held for men and women and participants with exclusively opposite-sex and both same- and opposite-sex contacts. Moreover, reciprocal influences between risky scripts and risky sexual behavior were found over time, confirming the proposed mutual reinforcement of scripts and behavior. The findings have implications for conceptualizing the role of scripts for consensual sex as vulnerability factors for sexual victimization among women and men and may inform intervention efforts.},
  language  = {en}
}