@article{HudsonPhamBubeck2019,
  author    = {Hudson, Paul and Pham, My and Bubeck, Philip},
  title     = {An evaluation and monetary assessment of the impact of flooding on subjective well-being across genders in Vietnam},
  series = {Climate \& development},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Climate \& development},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1756-5529},
  doi       = {10.1080/17565529.2019.1579698},
  pages     = {623 -- 637},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The intangible impacts of floods on welfare are not well investigated, even though they are important aspects of welfare. Moreover, flooding has gender based impacts on welfare. These differing impacts create a gender based flood risk resilience gap. We study the intangible impacts of flood risk on the subjective well-being of residents in central Vietnam. The measurement of intangible impacts through subjective well-being is a growing field within flood risk research. We find an initial drop in welfare through subjective well-being across genders when a flood is experienced. Male respondents tended to recover their welfare losses by around 80\% within 5 years while female respondents were associated with a welfare recovery of around 70\%. A monetization of the impacts floods have on an individual's subjective well-being shows that for the average female respondent, between 41\% to 86\% of annual income would be required to compensate subjective well-being losses after 5 years of experiencing a flood. The corresponding value for males is 30\% to 57\% of annual income. This shows that the intangible impacts of flood risk are important (across genders) and need to be integrated into flood (or climate) risk assessments to develop more socially appropriate risk management strategies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KratkySchroederAbe2020,
  author    = {Kratky, Nicole and Schr{\"o}der-Ab{\´e}, Michela},
  title     = {A court file analysis of child protection cases},
  series = {Child \& family social work},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Child \& family social work},
  number    = {S1},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1356-7500},
  doi       = {10.1111/cfs.12744},
  pages     = {169 -- 177},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Children's participation in legal proceedings affecting them personally has been gaining importance. So far, a primary research concern has been how children experience their participation in court proceedings. However, little is known about the child's voice itself: Are children able to clearly express their wishes, and if so, what do they say in child protection cases? In this study, we extracted information about children's statements from court file data of 220 child protection cases in Germany. We found 182 children were asked about their wishes. The majority of the statements found came either from reports of the guardians ad litem or from judicial records of the child hearings. Using content analysis, three main aspects of the statements were extracted: wishes concerning main place of residence, wishes about whom to have or not contact with, and children granting decision-making authority to someone else. Children's main focus was on their parents, but others (e.g., relatives and foster care providers) were also mentioned. Intercoder agreement was substantial. Making sure that child hearings are as informative as possible is in the child's best interest. Therefore, the categories developed herein might help professionals to ask questions more precisely relevant to the child.},
  language  = {en}
}