@article{FilserTiberiusKrausetal.2020,
  author    = {Filser, Matthias and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha and Spitzer, Jonathan and Kailer, Norbert and Bouncken, Ricarda B.},
  title     = {Sharing economy},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial venturing},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial venturing},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Inderscience Enterprises},
  address   = {Gen{\`e}ve},
  issn      = {1742-5360},
  doi       = {10.1504/IJEV.2020.112234},
  pages     = {665 -- 665},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The sharing economy has received increased attention in entrepreneurship research, resulting in a complex research landscape that is hard to overlook. Using a bibliometric analysis, we aim to further synthesise the field by: 1) summarising the most important definitions given by extant literature to capture the common understanding of the sharing economy; 2) identifying three thematic clusters based on the top 20 most cited publications; 3) conducting a citation analysis to show interdependencies between all authors; and 4) identifying the research methods used in the SE publications. Our results show: 1) many definitions with different emphases; 2) conceptualisation, collaborative consumption/ownership and the disruptive character of the sharing economy as three dominant research clusters; 3) a fairly even citation practice allowing for unbiased future research; and 4) that conceptual publications and quantitative as well as qualitative studies are fairly evenly published.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuenningHipp2022,
  author    = {B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Hipp, Lena},
  title     = {How can we become more equal?},
  series = {Journal of European social policy},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Journal of European social policy},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0958-9287},
  doi       = {10.1177/09589287211035701},
  pages     = {182 -- 196},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This study examines how public policies affect parents' preferences for a more egalitarian division of paid and unpaid work. Based on the assumption that individuals develop their preferences within a specific policy context, we examine how changes in three policies affect mothers' and fathers' work-family preferences: the availability of high-quality, affordable childcare; the right to return to a full-time job after having reduced hours to part-time and an increase in the number of 'partner months' in parental leave schemes. Analysing a unique probability sample of parents with young children in Germany from 2015 (N = 1756), we find that fathers would want to work slightly fewer hours if they had the right to return to a full-time position after working part-time, and mothers would want to work slightly more hours if childcare opportunities were improved. Full-time working parents, moreover, are found to prefer fewer hours independent of the policy setting, while non-employed parents would like to work at least some hours. Last but not least, our analyses show that increasing the number of partner months in the parental leave scheme considerably increases fathers' preferences for longer and mothers' preferences for shorter leave. Increasing the number of partner months in parental schemes hence has the greatest potential to increase gender equality.},
  language  = {en}
}