@misc{SchusterKrahe2017,
  author    = {Schuster, Isabell and Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {The prevalence of sexual aggression in Turkey: A systematic review},
  series = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journa},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journa},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1359-1789},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.003},
  pages     = {102 -- 114},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Although sexual aggression is recognized as a serious problem worldwide, evidence on the prevalence and impact of sexual aggression is based predominantly on studies from Western countries with a Christian or non-religious majority. Little evidence is available from non-Western countries, especially from Muslim societies. The purpose of the present article was to provide a first systematic review of the studies examining the prevalence of sexual aggression in Turkey, including both victimization and perpetration reports from women and men. Additionally, differences in prevalence rates depending on relationship constellations and characteristics of victims and perpetrators were reviewed. By a two-stage literature search, 56 studies were identified for inclusion. All studies examined sexual victimization of women, only four studies included sexual victimization of men. Data on sexual aggression perpetration were extremely limited, with only two studies providing prevalence rates. Prevalence rates of sexual victimization were found to vary greatly, which may be attributed to a lack of methodological and conceptual consistency across studies. Likewise, no consistent picture was revealed for victims' or perpetrators' sociodemographic or situational characteristics associated with differences in prevalence rates. We discuss reasons for the variability in prevalence rates and outline recommendations for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BonacheGonzalezMendezKrahe2017,
  author    = {Bonache, Helena and Gonzalez-Mendez, Rosaura and Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {Romantic Attachment, Conflict Resolution Styles, and Teen Dating Violence Victimization},
  series = {Journal of youth and adolescence : a multidisciplinary research publication},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {Journal of youth and adolescence : a multidisciplinary research publication},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0047-2891},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10964-017-0635-2},
  pages     = {1905 -- 1917},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Although research on dating violence has increased in the last decades, little is known about the role of romantic attachment and conflict resolution in understanding victimization by an intimate partner among adolescents. This study examined the relationships between insecure attachment styles, destructive conflict resolution strategies, self-reported and perceived in the partner, and psychological and physical victimization by a dating partner in 1298 adolescents (49\% girls). Anxious attachment was related to both forms of victimization via self-reported conflict engagement and conflict engagement attributed to the partner among boys and girls. Moreover, both insecure attachment styles were also indirectly linked to victimization via self-reported withdrawal and conflict engagement perceived in the partner, but only among boys. The implications of the findings for promoting constructive communication patterns among adolescents for handling their relationship conflicts are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}