@article{SchmidtWalzMartinLopezetal.2017,
  author    = {Schmidt, Katja and Walz, Ariane and Martin-Lopez, Berta and Sachse, Rene},
  title     = {Testing socio-cultural valuation methods of ecosystem services to explain land use preferences},
  series = {Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Ecosystem Services : Science, Policy and Practice},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2212-0416},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.001},
  pages     = {270 -- 288},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Socio-cultural valuation still emerges as a methodological field in ecosystem service (ES) research and until now lacks consistent formalisation and balanced application in ES assessments. In this study, we examine the explanatory value of ES values for land use preferences. We use 563 responses to a survey about the Pentland Hills regional park in Scotland. Specifically, we aim to (1) identify clusters of land use preferences by using a novel visualisation tool, (2) test if socio-cultural values of ESs or (3) user characteristics are linked with land use preferences, and (4) determine whether both socio-cultural values of ESs and user characteristics can predict land use preferences. Our results suggest that there are five groups of people with different land use preferences, ranging from forest and nature enthusiasts to traditionalists, multi-functionalists and recreation seekers. Rating and weighting of ESs and user characteristics were associated with different clusters. Neither socio-cultural values nor user characteristics were suitable predictors for land use preferences. While several studies have explored land use preferences by identifying socio-cultural values in the past, our findings imply that in this case study ES values inform about general perceptions but do not replace the assessment of land use preferences. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RogozaFatfouta2019,
  author    = {Rogoza, Radoslaw and Fatfouta, Ramzi},
  title     = {Normal and pathological communal narcissism in relation to personality traits and values},
  series = {Personality and individual differences : an international journal of research into the structure and development of personality, and the causation of individual differences},
  volume    = {140},
  journal   = {Personality and individual differences : an international journal of research into the structure and development of personality, and the causation of individual differences},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0191-8869},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.039},
  pages     = {76 -- 81},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Communal narcissism can be defined as grandiose self-views in the communal domain. Within the literature, two forms of communal narcissism, normal and pathological, can be distinguished. However, no study to date has investigated their convergence and divergence. Using a large community sample (N = 781), the current study aimed to fill this gap through examination of 1) the distinctiveness of normal and pathological communal narcissism; 2) their relationship to broad personality characteristics; and 3) values. Results suggest that 1) normal and pathological communal narcissism are structurally distinct constructs; 2) the difference in relation to personality characteristics is limited to neuroticism; and 3) they share the values of self-enhancement and self transcendence.},
  language  = {en}
}