@article{MoffittJuang2018,
  author    = {Moffitt, Ursula Elinor and Juang, Linda P.},
  title     = {"We don't do that in Germany!" A critical race theory examination of Turkish heritage young adults' school experiences},
  series = {Ethnicities},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {Ethnicities},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1468-7968},
  doi       = {10.1177/1468796818788596},
  pages     = {830 -- 857},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Turkish heritage students are underrepresented at university-track secondary schools in Germany, yet the institutional discrimination contributing to this ongoing disparity often remains unquestioned, situated within inequitable norms of belonging. Drawing on critical race theory and a risk and resilience framework, the current study investigated the interplay between institutional and interpersonal discrimination in relation to exclusionary norms enacted in university-track schools. Using thematic analysis, interviews with eight Turkish German young adults from multiple regions of Germany were analyzed, highlighting the need for culturally responsive teaching, more teacher reflexivity regarding bias, a greater focus on equity, and more direct discussions of racism and its impact.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hadad2020,
  author    = {Hadad, Yemima},
  title     = {"Ich Habe Nicht Geantwortet"},
  series = {Naharaim : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r deutsch-j{\"u}dische Literatur und Kulturgeschichte (Journal of German-Jewish Literature and Cultural History)},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Naharaim : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r deutsch-j{\"u}dische Literatur und Kulturgeschichte (Journal of German-Jewish Literature and Cultural History)},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1862-9156},
  doi       = {10.1515/naha-2019-0015},
  pages     = {103 -- 132},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The exchange between Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig on the status of halakha is a well known, but also frustrating fixture in scholarship. For rather than responding to Rosenzweig's critique, Buber seems to retreat in silence, claiming to be "unable to speak" about his position on Jewish Law. Scholars have generally tried to explain Buber's failure to respond on philosophical and biographical grounds. What I propose, by contrast, is to revisit the question of Buber's silence and secrecy from a hermeneutical standpoint, arguing that Buber engaged in a deliberate strategy of concealment that constituted its own form of response. The hermeneutics of silence discloses a call for religious renewal that follows a state of Dialogvergessenheit, but which cannot be made audible. Neither dialogue nor its remembrance can be commanded. While Buber struggles with his Nichtredenk{\"o}nnen, he also stands in a tradition of secretive hermeneutics - the Jewish hermeneutics of sod.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BievrePerrin2021,
  author    = {Bi{\`e}vre-Perrin, Fabien},
  title     = {"Everything is a copy of a copy of a copy"},
  series = {thersites 13: Antiquipop - Chefs d'œuvres revisit{\´e}s},
  volume    = {2021},
  journal   = {thersites 13: Antiquipop - Chefs d'œuvres revisit{\´e}s},
  number    = {13},
  editor    = {Bi{\`e}vre-Perrin, Fabien and Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Rollinger, Christian and Walde, Christine},
  issn      = {2364-7612},
  doi       = {10.34679/thersites.vol13.191},
  pages     = {i -- v},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {A quote from Fight Club (Chuck Palahniuk, 1996) may seem unusual for a Classicist. Nevertheless, this famous sentence summarises the contents of this special issue of thersites perfectly. As specialists in classical reception frequently witness, there is a sort of d{\´e}j{\`a}-vu effect when it comes to the presence of Antiquity within popular culture. In 2019, to try to better understand the phenomenon, Antiquipop invited researchers to take an interest in the construction and semantic path of these "masterpieces" in contemporary popular culture, with a particular focus on the 21st century.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Pinkas2021,
  author    = {Pinkas, Ronen},
  title     = {"Der Sabbat" as a point of reference for evaluating Erich Fromm's approach to Jewish Law},
  series = {Fromm Forum},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Fromm Forum},
  publisher = {Internationale Erich-Fromm-Gesellschaft},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  issn      = {1437-0956},
  pages     = {19 -- 41},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BarthWeingartenOgden2021,
  author    = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Ogden, Richard},
  title     = {"Chunking" spoken language},
  series = {Open linguistics},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Open linguistics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2300-9969},
  doi       = {10.1515/opli-2020-0173},
  pages     = {531 -- 548},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this introductory paper to the special issue on "Weak cesuras in talk-in-interaction", we aim to guide the reader into current work on the "chunking" of naturally occurring talk. It is conducted in the methodological frameworks of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics - two approaches that consider the interactional aspect of humans talking with each other to be a crucial starting point for its analysis. In doing so, we will (1) lay out the background of this special issue (what is problematic about "chunking" talk-in-interaction, the characteristics of the methodological approach chosen by the contributors, the cesura model), (2) highlight what can be gained from such a revised understanding of "chunking" in talk-in-interaction by referring to previous work with this model as well as the findings of the contributions to this special issue, and (3) indicate further directions such work could take starting from papers in this special issue. We hope to induce a fruitful exchange on the phenomena discussed, across methodological divides.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SeewannVerwiebeBuderetal.2022,
  author    = {Seewann, Lena and Verwiebe, Roland and Buder, Claudia and Fritsch, Nina-Sophie},
  title     = {"Broadcast your gender."},
  series = {Frontiers in Big Data},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Big Data},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Frontiers},
  address   = {Lausanne, Schweiz},
  issn      = {2624-909X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fdata.2022.908636},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Social media platforms provide a large array of behavioral data relevant to social scientific research. However, key information such as sociodemographic characteristics of agents are often missing. This paper aims to compare four methods of classifying social attributes from text. Specifically, we are interested in estimating the gender of German social media creators. By using the example of a random sample of 200 YouTube channels, we compare several classification methods, namely (1) a survey among university staff, (2) a name dictionary method with the World Gender Name Dictionary as a reference list, (3) an algorithmic approach using the website gender-api.com, and (4) a Multinomial Na{\"i}ve Bayes (MNB) machine learning technique. These different methods identify gender attributes based on YouTube channel names and descriptions in German but are adaptable to other languages. Our contribution will evaluate the share of identifiable channels, accuracy and meaningfulness of classification, as well as limits and benefits of each approach. We aim to address methodological challenges connected to classifying gender attributes for YouTube channels as well as related to reinforcing stereotypes and ethical implications.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wiemann2018,
  author    = {Wiemann, Dirk},
  title     = {"...saying what was previously unthinkable"},
  series = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {101},
  journal   = {Hard times : deutsch-englische Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0171-1695},
  pages     = {15 -- 23},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BjoerkHoelzleBoer2021,
  author    = {Bj{\"o}rk, Jennie and H{\"o}lzle, Katharina and Boer, Harry},
  title     = {'What will we learn from the current crisis?'},
  series = {Creativity and innovation management},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Creativity and innovation management},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  address   = {Oxford [u.a.]},
  issn      = {0963-1690},
  doi       = {10.1111/caim.12442},
  pages     = {231 -- 232},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Becker2022,
  author    = {Becker, Julius Lucas},
  title     = {'To grab, when the grabbing begins'},
  series = {The international history review},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {The international history review},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
  issn      = {0707-5332},
  doi       = {10.1080/07075332.2021.1909101},
  pages     = {1 -- 20},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The Sino-Japanese War of 1894/95 is usually only briefly mentioned in studies on diplomatic history. Especially the war's impact on Wilhelmine foreign and world policy (Weltpolitik) has been largely neglected. However, the events in East Asia had a profound influence on the political leadership in Berlin. The Wilhelmstrasse's attitude towards the conflict changed rapidly when the course of the war in Northeast Asia made a collapse of the Qing Empire increasingly likely. Afraid of the prospect of being left empty handed in an upcoming scramble for China, German diplomacy got active in early 1895. Driven by a hectic activism which soon should become a dominant feature of Weltpolitik, Berlin concluded an ad-hoc alliance with St. Petersburg and Paris. In April 1895, this unlikely coalition intervened against Tokyo. While the Triple Intervention served primarily Russia's interest to maintain the status quo on the Chinese mainland, Germany aimed at the acquisition of a military and commercial base in Northeast Asia. Driven by public opinion, the naval leadership and the Emperor Wilhelm II., the formerly neutral and reserved German diplomacy changed towards an aggressive and unstable imperialist policy, which ultimately resulted in the acquisition of Qingdao in November 1897.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CarlaUhink2024,
  author    = {Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo},
  title     = {'He had thoughtlessly accepted certain gifts'},
  series = {Cultural History},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cultural History},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Edinburgh University Press},
  address   = {Edinburgh},
  issn      = {2045-290X},
  pages     = {52 -- 70},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {It has been highlighted many times how difficult it is to draw a boundary between gift and bribe, and how the same transfer can be interpreted in different ways according to the position of the observer and the narrative frame into which it is inserted. This also applied of course to Ancient Rome; in both the Republic and Principate lawgivers tried to define the limits of acceptable transfers and thus also to identify what we might call 'corruption'. Yet, such definitions remained to a large extent blurred, and what was constructed was mostly a 'code of conduct', allowing Roman politicians to perform their own 'honesty' in public duty - while being aware at all times that their involvement in different kinds of transfer might be used by their opponents against them and presented as a case of 'corrupt' behaviour.},
  language  = {en}
}