@misc{Kuettner2014,
  author    = {K{\"u}ttner, Uwe-Alexander},
  title     = {Rhythmic analyses as a proof-procedure?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {172},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44536},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-445363},
  pages     = {26},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {This paper reports a problematic case of unequivocally evidencing participant orientation to the projective force of some turn-initial demonstrative wh-clefts (DCs) within the framework of Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL). Conducting rhythmic analyses appears helpful in this regard, in that they disclose rhythmic regularities which suggest a speaker's orientation towards a projected turn continuation. In this particular case, rhythmic analyses can therefore be shown to meaningfully complement sequential analyses and analyses of turn-design, so as to gather additional evidence for participant orientations. In conclusion, I will point to possibly more extensive relations between rhythmicity and projection and proffer a tentative outlook for the usability of rhythmic analyses as an analytic tool in CA and IL.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BarthWeingartenOgden2021,
  author    = {Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Ogden, Richard},
  title     = {"Chunking" spoken language},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-53625},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-536259},
  pages     = {531 -- 548},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this introductory paper to the special issue on "Weak cesuras in talk-in-interaction", we aim to guide the reader into current work on the "chunking" of naturally occurring talk. It is conducted in the methodological frameworks of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics - two approaches that consider the interactional aspect of humans talking with each other to be a crucial starting point for its analysis. In doing so, we will (1) lay out the background of this special issue (what is problematic about "chunking" talk-in-interaction, the characteristics of the methodological approach chosen by the contributors, the cesura model), (2) highlight what can be gained from such a revised understanding of "chunking" in talk-in-interaction by referring to previous work with this model as well as the findings of the contributions to this special issue, and (3) indicate further directions such work could take starting from papers in this special issue. We hope to induce a fruitful exchange on the phenomena discussed, across methodological divides.},
  language  = {en}
}