@article{NuthmannEngbertKliegl2007,
  author    = {Nuthmann, Antje and Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The IOVP-effect in mindless reading : Experiment and modeling},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.005},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Fixation durations in reading are longer for within-word fixation positions close to word center than for positions near word boundaries. This counterintuitive result was termed the Inverted-Optimal Viewing Position (IOVP) effect. We proposed an explanation of the effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations [Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., \& Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217], that suggests that the IOVP effect is not related to word processing. Here we demonstrate the existence of an IOVP effect in "mindless reading", a G-string scanning task. We compare the results from experimental data with results obtained from computer simulations of a simple model of the IOVP effect and discuss alternative accounts. We conclude that oculornotor errors, which often induce mislocalized fixations, represent the most important source of the IOVP effect. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LaubrockEngbertRolfsetal.2007,
  author    = {Laubrock, Jochen and Engbert, Ralf and Rolfs, Martin and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Microsaccades are an index of covert attention : commentary on Horowitz, Fine, Fencsik, Yurgenson and Wolfe},
  issn      = {0956-7976},
  doi       = {10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01904.x},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KlieglRisseLaubrock2007,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Risse, Sarah and Laubrock, Jochen},
  title     = {Preview Benefit and Parafoveal-on-Foveal Effects from Word N+2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-57186},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm with the boundary placed after word n, we manipulated preview of word n+2 for fixations on word n. There was no preview benefit for first-pass reading on word n+2, replicating the results of Rayner, Juhasz, and Brown (2007), but there was a preview benefit on the three-letter word n+1, that is, after the boundary, but before word n+2. Additionally, both word n+1 and word n+2 exhibited parafoveal-on-foveal effects on word n. Thus, during a fixation on word n and given a short word n+1, some information is extracted from word n+2, supporting the hypothesis of distributed processing in the perceptual span.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglRisseLaubrock2007,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Risse, Sarah and Laubrock, Jochen},
  title     = {Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2},
  issn      = {0096-1523},
  doi       = {10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1250},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm with the boundary placed after word n, the experiment manipulated preview of word n + 2 for fixations on word n. There was no preview benefit for 1st-pass reading on word n + 2, replicating the results of K. Rayner, B. J. Juhasz, and S. J. Brown (2007), but there was a preview benefit on the 3- letter word n + 1, that is, after the boundary but before word n + 2. Additionally, both word n + 1 and word n + 2 exhibited parafoveal-on-foveal effects on word n. Thus, during a fixation on word n and given a short word n + 1, some information is extracted from word n + 2, supporting the hypothesis of distributed processing in the perceptual span.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kliegl2007,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Towards a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading : a reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngbertNuthmannKliegl2007,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Nuthmann, Antje and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {An lterative algorithm for the estimation of the distribution of mislocated fixations during reading},
  isbn      = {978-0-08-044980-7},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DambacherKliegl2007,
  author    = {Dambacher, Michael and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Synchronizing timelines : relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading},
  issn      = {0006-8993},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.027},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {We examined relations between eye movements (single-fixation durations) and RSVP-based event-related potentials (ERPs; N400s) recorded during reading the same sentences in two independent experiments. Longer fixation durations correlated with larger N400 amplitudes. Word frequency and predictability of the fixated word as well as the predictability of the upcoming word accounted for this covariance in a path-analytic model. Moreover, larger N400 amplitudes entailed longer fixation durations on the next word, a relation accounted for by word frequency. This pattern offers a neurophysiological correlate for the lag-word frequency effect on fixation durations: word processing is reliably expressed not only in fixation durations on currently fixated words, but also in those on subsequently fixated words.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DambacherKliegl2007,
  author    = {Dambacher, Michael and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Synchronizing timelines: Relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-57212},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {We examined relations between eye movements (single-fixation durations) and RSVP-based event-related potentials (ERPs; N400's) recorded during reading the same sentences in two independent experiments. Longer fixation durations correlated with larger N400 amplitudes. Word frequency and predictability of the fixated word as well as the predictability of the upcoming word accounted for this covariance in a path-analytic model. Moreover, larger N400 amplitudes entailed longer fixation durations on the next word, a relation accounted for by word frequency. This pattern offers a neurophysiological correlate for the lag-word frequency effect on fixation durations: Word processing is reliably expressed not only in fixation durations on currently fixated words, but also in those on subsequently fixated words.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BohnKliegl2007,
  author    = {Bohn, Christiane and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Post-interpretive processes influence interpretive processing during reading: evidence from eye movements},
  isbn      = {978-18-4169-96-9},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}