@book{WolfPolzenhagen2009, author = {Wolf, Hans-Georg and Polzenhagen, Frank}, title = {World Englishes : a cognitive sociolinguistic approach}, series = {Applications of cognitive linguistics}, volume = {8}, journal = {Applications of cognitive linguistics}, publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, New York}, isbn = {978-3-11-019633-7}, doi = {10.1515/9783110199222}, pages = {XIV, 278 S.}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{WolfIgboanusi2009, author = {Wolf, Hans-Georg and Igboanusi, Herbert}, title = {The role of ethnically mixed marriages in language shift : a case study of Nigeria's minority languages}, year = {2009}, abstract = {As the foundation of homes, the marriage institution is an important agent of sociali- zation. In this regard, marriage can be relied upon as a major factor in language and cultural maintenance. However, mixed marriages may contribute to language shift in the home because they can lead to a change in language use patterns among minority language speakers and their children. This means that the likelihood of preserving a minority language is greater in marriages among individuals who speak the same indigenous language than in situations in which spouses speak different languages. This study uses questionnaire data from parents of ethnically mixed marriages to explain how mixed marriages contribute to language shift from minority languages to English (Nigeria's official language), Nigerian Pidgin (informal lingua franca) and the major languages (i.e. Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba) in the home domains. The study shows that the future of minority languages will largely depend on the roles of families and the value attached to minority ethnic identity by young people, particularly those from mixed homes. Keywords: language shift; maintenance; family; minority languages; intermarriage; nigeria}, language = {en} } @misc{Wischer2009, author = {Wischer, Ilse}, title = {Rissanen, M. (Hrsg.), Hintikka, M. (Hrsg.), Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (Hrsg.), McConchie, R. (Hrsg.), Change in Meaning and the Meaning of Change; Helsinki, Soci{\´e}t{\´e} N{\´e}ophilologique, 2007}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{Wiemann2009, author = {Wiemann, Dirk}, title = {"Im Angesicht der Majest{\"a}t : Geschichte, Mythos und Transnationalit{\"a}t in Shekhhar Kapurs Elizabeth- Filmen"}, isbn = {978-3-7705-4803-3}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{Wiemann2009, author = {Wiemann, Dirk}, title = {Empire and freedom : William Davenant's 'Republican' Plays}, isbn = {978-3-86821- 132-0}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{Wiemann2009, author = {Wiemann, Dirk}, title = {Bashing the bishop : the Rowan Williams Row and the incomplete secularisation of Britain}, issn = {0944-9094}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @article{Wiemann2009, author = {Wiemann, Dirk}, title = {Wilber's Force : abolitionism and the power of sensibility in Michael Apted's amazing grace}, issn = {0171-1695}, year = {2009}, language = {en} } @misc{Tristram2009, author = {Tristram, Hildegard L.C.}, title = {Wie weit sind die inselkeltischen Sprachen (und das Englische) analytisiert?}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-41251}, year = {2009}, abstract = {Der gemeinsame Wandel der inselkeltischen Sprachen wie auch des Englischen vom vorwiegend synthetischen Typus zum vorwiegend analytischen Typus l{\"a}ßt sich vermutlich auf einen ca. 1500 Jahre dauernden intensiven Sprachenkontakt zwischen diesen Sprachen zur{\"u}ckf{\"u}hren. Heute ist das Englische die analytischste Sprache der Britischen Inseln und Irlands, gefolgt vom Walisischen, Bretonischen und Irischen. Letzteres ist von den genannten Sprachen noch am weitesten morphologisch komplex.}, language = {de} } @article{Mahlberg2009, author = {Mahlberg, Gaby}, title = {Henry Neville and English republican culture in the seventeenth century : dreaming of another game}, series = {Politics, culture and society in early modern Britain}, journal = {Politics, culture and society in early modern Britain}, edition = {1. publ}, publisher = {Manchester Univ. Press}, address = {Manchester}, isbn = {978-0-7190-7946-7}, pages = {288 S.}, year = {2009}, abstract = {Henry Neville and English Republican Culture in the Seventeenth Century is the first full-length study of the republican Henry Neville in his many facets as country gentleman, politician, political thinker, rebel and libeller. It traces the development of Neville's political thought from the English Civil Wars to the Exclusion Crisis and beyond, while also challenging the way in which the history of ideas has been conceptualised in recent years by discussing Neville's political theory alongside his lesser known libels, shams and poetry. The book also challenges an established view of Neville based on his collaboration with the better-known philosopher James Harrington and shows Neville as a political thinker in his own right. While studies of early modern English republicanism tend to focus on the Interregnum, Neville's Plato redivivus, which promoted a restructuring of the political order, was only published after the 1660 Restoration of the monarchy. This study therefore draws attention to long-term continuities in English republican thought and introduces the concept of anti-patriarchalism to focus on what Neville and other republicans writing before 1649 or after 1660 had in common. They shared their opposition to tyranny, not monarchy, and aimed to limit the discretionary powers of the executive - a concern which links the debates between the Long Parliament and the King of 1641 to Neville's proposals to limit the powers of the Crown in 1681. The author's engagement with Neville's reputation as an atheist and crypto-Catholic also sheds new light on the role of religion in republican thought.}, language = {en} } @article{Mahlberg2009, author = {Mahlberg, Gaby}, title = {Neo-Harringtonianism and " a letter sent to General Monk" (1660) revisited}, issn = {0268-117X}, year = {2009}, abstract = {This article argues that a pamphlet entitled "A Letter Sent to General Monk" (1660) has been wrongly attributed to the English republican Henry Neville (1619-94). Instead, the pamphlet was more likely written by a representative of the Presbyterian faction shortly before the restoration of the Stuart monarchy in 1660.}, language = {en} }