@phdthesis{Raiser2014,
  author    = {Raiser, Christoph},
  title     = {Kompromisse im Europ{\"a}ischen Parlament : eine kultursoziologische Analyse von Entscheidungsprozessen in einer supranationalen Institution},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-283-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-69560},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xxiii, 313},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Das Europ{\"a}ische Parlament ist zweifelsohne die m{\"a}chtigste parlamentarische Versammlung auf supranationaler Ebene. Das provoziert die Frage, wie Entscheidungen in diesem Parlament gef{\"a}llt werden und wie sie begr{\"u}ndet werden k{\"o}nnen. Darin liegt das Hauptanliegen dieser Arbeit, die zur Beantwortung dieser Frage auf soziologische Ans{\"a}tze der Erkl{\"a}rung sozialen Handelns zur{\"u}ckgreift und damit einen neuen Zugang zur Beobachtung parlamentarischen Handelns schafft. Dabei arbeitet sie heraus, wie wichtig es ist, bei der Analyse politischer Entscheidungsprozesse zu beachten, wie politische Probleme von Akteuren interpretiert und gegen{\"u}ber Verhandlungspartnern dargestellt werden. An den Fallbeispielen der Entscheidungsprozesse zur Dienstleistungsrichtlinie, zur Chemikalien-Verordnung REACH und dem TDIP (CIA)-Ausschuss in der Legislaturperiode 2004-2009, wird der soziale Mechanismus dargestellt, der hinter Einigungen im Europ{\"a}ischen Parlament steckt. Kultur als Interpretation der Welt wird so zum Schl{\"u}ssel des Verst{\"a}ndnisses politischer Entscheidungen auf supranationaler Ebene.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{HeckmannSchwanghartPhillips2015,
  author    = {Heckmann, Tobias and Schwanghart, Wolfgang and Phillips, Jonathan D.},
  title     = {Graph theory-recent developments of its application in geomorphology},
  series = {Geomorphology : an international journal on pure and applied geomorphology},
  volume    = {243},
  journal   = {Geomorphology : an international journal on pure and applied geomorphology},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0169-555X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.024},
  pages     = {130 -- 146},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Applications of graph theory have proliferated across the academic spectrum in recent years. Whereas geosciences and landscape ecology have made rich use of graph theory, its use seems limited in physical geography, and particularly in geomorphology. Common applications of graph theory analyses of connectivity, path or transport efficiencies, subnetworks, network structure, system behaviour and dynamics, and network optimization or engineering all have uses or potential uses in geomorphology and closely related fields. In this paper, we give a short introduction to graph theory and review previous geomorphological applications or works in related fields that have been particularly influential. Network-like geomorphic systems can be classified into nonspatial or spatially implicit system components linked by statistical/causal relationships and spatial units linked by some spatial relationship, for example by fluxes of matter and/or energy. We argue that, if geomorphic system properties and behaviour (e.g., complexity, sensitivity, synchronisability, historical contingency, connectivity etc.) depend on system structure and if graph theory is able to quantitatively describe the configuration of system components, then graph theory should provide us with tools that help in quantifying system properties and in inferring system behaviour. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CoupetteHartungBeckedorfetal.2022,
  author    = {Coupette, Corinna and Hartung, Dirk and Beckedorf, Janis and B{\"o}ther, Maximilian and Katz, Daniel Martin},
  title     = {Law smells},
  series = {Artificial intelligence and law},
  volume    = {31},
  journal   = {Artificial intelligence and law},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0924-8463},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10506-022-09315-w},
  pages     = {335 -- 368},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Building on the computer science concept of code smells, we initiate the study of law smells, i.e., patterns in legal texts that pose threats to the comprehensibility and maintainability of the law. With five intuitive law smells as running examples-namely, duplicated phrase, long element, large reference tree, ambiguous syntax, and natural language obsession-, we develop a comprehensive law smell taxonomy. This taxonomy classifies law smells by when they can be detected, which aspects of law they relate to, and how they can be discovered. We introduce text-based and graph-based methods to identify instances of law smells, confirming their utility in practice using the United States Code as a test case. Our work demonstrates how ideas from software engineering can be leveraged to assess and improve the quality of legal code, thus drawing attention to an understudied area in the intersection of law and computer science and highlighting the potential of computational legal drafting.},
  language  = {en}
}