@phdthesis{Ghandour2020,
  author    = {Ghandour, Rabea},
  title     = {Identification of chloroplast translational feedback regulation and establishment of aptamer based mRNA purification to unravel involved regulatory factors},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-48289},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-482896},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {XIII, 173},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {After endosymbiosis, chloroplasts lost most of their genome. Many former endosymbiotic genes are now nucleus-encoded and the products are re-imported post-translationally. Consequently, photosynthetic complexes are built of nucleus- and plastid-encoded subunits in a well-defined stoichiometry. In Chlamydomonas, the translation of chloroplast-encoded photosynthetic core subunits is feedback-regulated by the assembly state of the complexes they reside in. This process is called Control by Epistasy of Synthesis (CES) and enables the efficient production of photosynthetic core subunits in stoichiometric amounts. In chloroplasts of embryophytes, only Rubisco subunits have been shown to be feedback-regulated. That opens the question if there is additional CES regulation in embryophytes. I analyzed chloroplast gene expression in tobacco and Arabidopsis mutants with assembly defects for each photosynthetic complex to broadly answer this question. My results (i) confirmed CES within Rubisco and hint to potential translational feedback regulation in the synthesis of (ii) cytochrome b6f (Cyt b6f) and (iii) photosystem II (PSII) subunits. This work suggests a CES network in PSII that links psbD, psbA, psbB, psbE, and potentially psbH expression by a feedback mechanism that at least partially differs from that described in Chlamydomonas. Intriguingly, in the Cyt b6f complex, a positive feedback regulation that coordinates the synthesis of PetA and PetB was observed, which was not previously reported in Chlamydomonas. No evidence for CES interactions was found in the expression of NDH and ATP synthase subunits of embryophytes. Altogether, this work provides solid evidence for novel assembly-dependent feedback regulation mechanisms controlling the expression of photosynthetic genes in chloroplasts of embryophytes. In order to obtain a comprehensive inventory of the rbcL and psbA RNA-binding proteomes (including factors that regulate their expression, especially factors involved in CES), an aptamer based affinity purification method was adapted and refined for the specific purification these transcripts from tobacco chloroplasts. To this end, three different aptamers (MS2, Sephadex ,and streptavidin binding) were stably introduced into the 3' UTRs of psbA and rbcL by chloroplast transformation. RNA aptamer based purification and subsequent chip analysis (RAP Chip) demonstrated a strong enrichment of psbA and rbcL transcripts and currently, ongoing mass spectrometry analyses shall reveal potential regulatory factors. Furthermore, the suborganellar localization of MS2 tagged psbA and rbcL transcripts was analyzed by a combined affinity, immunology, and electron microscopy approach and demonstrated the potential of aptamer tags for the examination of the spatial distribution of chloroplast transcripts.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Bombart2020,
  author    = {Bombart, Diane},
  title     = {The geometry of a complex institution},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-48872},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-488724},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {181},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Organizations incorporate the institutional demands from their environment in order to be deemed legitimate and survive. Yet, complexifying societies promulgate multiple and sometimes inconsistent institutional prescriptions. When these prescriptions collide, organizations are said to face "institutional complexity". How does an organization then incorporate incompatible demands? What are the consequences of institutional complexity for an organization? The literature provides contradictory conceptual and empirical insights on the matter. A central assumption, however, remains that internal incompatibilities generate tensions that, under certain conditions, can escalate into intractable conflicts, resulting in dysfunctionality and loss of legitimacy. The present research is an inquiry into what happens inside an organization when it incorporates complex institutional demands. To answer this question, I focus on how individuals inside an organization interpret a complex institutional prescription. I examine how members of the French Development Agency interpret 'results-based management', a central but complex concept of organizing in the field of development aid. I use an inductive mixed methods design to systematically explore how different interpretations of results-based management relate to one another and to the organizational context in which they are embedded. The results reveal that results-based management is a contested concept in the French Development Agency. I find multiple interpretations of the concept, which are attached to partly incompatible rationales about "who we are" and "what we do as an organization". These rationales nevertheless coexist as balanced forces, without escalating into open conflict. The analysis points to four reasons for this peaceful coexistence of diverging rationales inside one and the same organization: 1) individuals' capacity to manipulate different interpretations of a complex institutional demand, 2) the nature of interpretations, which makes them more or less prone to conflict, 3) the balanced distribution of rationales across the organizational sub-contexts and 4) the shared rules of interpretation provided by the larger socio-cultural context. This research shows that an organization that incorporates institutional complexity comes to represent different, partly incompatible things to its members without being at war with itself. In doing so, it contributes to our knowledge of institutional complexity and organizational hybridity. It also advances our understanding of internal organizational legitimacy and of the translation of managerial concepts in organizations.},
  language  = {en}
}