@article{MehrenHeiderSaueretal.2019,
  author    = {Mehren, Christoph and Heider, Franziska and Sauer, Daniel and Kothe, Ralph and Korge, Andreas and Hitzl, Wolfgang and W{\"u}rtz-Kozak, Karin},
  title     = {Clinical and radiological outcome of a new total cervical disc replacement design},
  series = {Spine},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Spine},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Lippincott Williams \& Wilkins},
  address   = {Philadelphia},
  issn      = {0362-2436},
  doi       = {10.1097/BRS.0000000000002799},
  pages     = {E202 -- E210},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Study Design. A nonrandomized, prospective, and single- center clinical trial of the ProDisc Vivo prosthesis. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological results of a refined total cervical disc replacement (cTDR), the ProDisc Vivo, with two years of follow-up (FU). The incidence of implant-related complications was recorded as a secondary outcome variable. Summary of Background Data. Previous generations of the ProDisc artificial cervical disc replacement generate high primary stability due to keel-based designs with opening of the anterior cortex during the implantation and subsequent high rates of heterotopic ossifications. Methods. Clinical outcome scores included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), arm and neck pain self-assessment questionnaires. The radiological outcome included the range of motion (ROM) and the occurrence of heterotopic ossifications. The incidence of implant-related complications with new implant design was recorded as a secondary outcome variable. Results. A total of 55 patients received a single-level treatment with the ProDisc Vivo cTDR between C3/4 and C6/7, with a follow-up rate of 78\%. The clinical outcome scores improved in all parameters significantly (P 1/4 0.0001) (NDI: 68.3 -> 17.4; VAS arm: 6.3 -> 1.4; VAS neck: 4.9 -> 1.6). The ROM of the indexsegment did not show a significant change (P 1/4 0.26) (7.9 degrees -> 9.2 degrees). Heterotopic ossifications at the index segment was found as grade 0 in 5\%, grade 1 in 22\%, grade 2 in 10\%, grade 3 (with functional impairment of the prosthesis) in 7\%, and grade 4 in 3\% of the cases. We observed three implant-related complications (5.5\%), with two implant dislocations anteriorly and one low-grade infect. Conclusion. cTDR with ProDisc Vivo demonstrated a significant and sustained improvement of all clinical outcome parameters. A less invasive implantation mechanism with lower primary stability of the cTDR might be a reason for a higher dislocation rate than the keel-based previous generation ProDisc C.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GladkayagrosseDeters2023,
  author    = {Gladkaya, Margarita and große Deters, Fenne},
  title     = {Capturing the self-others dichotomy of social media use},
  series = {Information \& management : the international journal of information systems applications},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Information \& management : the international journal of information systems applications},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0378-7206},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.im.2023.103899},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Focusing on the passive use of Instagram, we apply the affordance perspective to deeply explore its use and use-related outcomes. In the qualitative study, we uncover the affordances of focal social media features. Two distinct groups of affordances (self- and others-oriented) emerge. Following the grounded theory methodology, we develop the affordances-actualizations-outcomes model, explaining how immediate goals associated with features translate into outcomes. In the quantitative study, we test the model by applying structural equation modeling. Our findings confirm that actualizations of self- and others-oriented affordances are associated with distinct outcomes: social connectedness, positive affect, and overall satisfaction with Instagram experience.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{RoeschTiberiusKraus2023,
  author    = {R{\"o}sch, Nicolas and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Design thinking for innovation},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1460-1060},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60834},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-608341},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose - Design thinking has become an omnipresent process to foster innovativeness in various fields. Due to its popularity in both practice and theory, the number of publications has been growing rapidly. The authors aim to develop a research framework that reflects the current state of research and allows for the identification of research gaps. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a systematic literature review based on 164 scholarly articles on design thinking. Findings - This study proposes a framework, which identifies individual and organizational context factors, the stages of a typical design thinking process with its underlying principles and tools, and the individual as well as organizational outcomes of a design thinking project. Originality/value - Whereas previous reviews focused on particular aspects of design thinking, such as its characteristics, the organizational culture as a context factor or its role on new product development, the authors provide a holistic overview of the current state of research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RoeschTiberiusKraus2023,
  author    = {R{\"o}sch, Nicolas and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Design thinking for innovation},
  series = {European journal of innovation management},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {European journal of innovation management},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Emerald},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1460-1060},
  doi       = {10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0164},
  pages     = {160 -- 176},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose - Design thinking has become an omnipresent process to foster innovativeness in various fields. Due to its popularity in both practice and theory, the number of publications has been growing rapidly. The authors aim to develop a research framework that reflects the current state of research and allows for the identification of research gaps. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a systematic literature review based on 164 scholarly articles on design thinking. Findings - This study proposes a framework, which identifies individual and organizational context factors, the stages of a typical design thinking process with its underlying principles and tools, and the individual as well as organizational outcomes of a design thinking project. Originality/value - Whereas previous reviews focused on particular aspects of design thinking, such as its characteristics, the organizational culture as a context factor or its role on new product development, the authors provide a holistic overview of the current state of research.},
  language  = {en}
}