@misc{HessMousikouSchroeder2021,
  author    = {Heß, Stefan and Mousikou, Petroula and Schroeder, Sascha},
  title     = {Morphological processing in developmental handwriting production},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {0922-4777},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58736},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-587363},
  pages     = {21},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this study, we investigated effects of morphological processing on handwriting production in beginning writers of German. Children from Grades 3 and 4 were asked to copy words from a computer screen onto a pen tablet, while we recorded their handwriting with high spatiotemporal resolution. Words involved a syllable-congruent visual disruption (e.g., "Golfer"), a morpheme-congruent visual disruption (e.g., "Golfer"), or had no disruption (e.g., "Golfer"). We analyzed productions in terms of Writing Onset Duration and Letter Duration at the onset of the second syllable ("f" in "Gol.fer") and the onset of the suffix ("e" in "Golf_er"). Results showed that durations were longer at word-writing onset only for words with a morpheme-congruent visual disruption. Also, letter durations were longer at the onset of the second syllable (i.e., "-fer") and shorter at the onset of the suffix (i.e., "-er") only for words with a syllable-congruent visual disruption. We interpret these findings within extant theories of handwriting production and offer an explanation for the observed effects before and during trajectory formation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HessMousikouSchroeder2021,
  author    = {Heß, Stefan and Mousikou, Petroula and Schroeder, Sascha},
  title     = {Morphological processing in developmental handwriting production},
  series = {Reading and writing: An interdisciplinary journal},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {Reading and writing: An interdisciplinary journal},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1573-0905},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11145-021-10204-y},
  pages     = {899 -- 917},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In this study, we investigated effects of morphological processing on handwriting production in beginning writers of German. Children from Grades 3 and 4 were asked to copy words from a computer screen onto a pen tablet, while we recorded their handwriting with high spatiotemporal resolution. Words involved a syllable-congruent visual disruption (e.g., "Golfer"), a morpheme-congruent visual disruption (e.g., "Golfer"), or had no disruption (e.g., "Golfer"). We analyzed productions in terms of Writing Onset Duration and Letter Duration at the onset of the second syllable ("f" in "Gol.fer") and the onset of the suffix ("e" in "Golf_er"). Results showed that durations were longer at word-writing onset only for words with a morpheme-congruent visual disruption. Also, letter durations were longer at the onset of the second syllable (i.e., "-fer") and shorter at the onset of the suffix (i.e., "-er") only for words with a syllable-congruent visual disruption. We interpret these findings within extant theories of handwriting production and offer an explanation for the observed effects before and during trajectory formation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KrajenbrinkNickelsKohnen2015,
  author    = {Krajenbrink, Trudy and Nickels, Lyndsey and Kohnen, Saskia},
  title     = {Generalisation after treatment of acquired spelling impairments: A review},
  series = {Neuropsychological rehabilitation},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Neuropsychological rehabilitation},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0960-2011},
  doi       = {10.1080/09602011.2014.983135},
  pages     = {503 -- 554},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {This paper provides a comprehensive review of treatment studies of acquired dysgraphia and the occurrence of generalisation after this treatment. The aim is to examine what determines the occurrence of generalisation by investigating the link between the level of impairment, the method of treatment, and the outcome of therapy. We present the outcomes of treatment with regard to generalisation in 40 treatment studies. We derive general principles of generalisation which provide us with a better understanding of the mechanism of generalisation: (1) Direct treatment effects on representations or processes; (2) interactive processing and summation of activation; and (3) strategies and compensatory skills. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the cognitive processes used for spelling. Finally, we provide suggestions for the direction of further research into this important area, as a better understanding of the mechanism of generalisation could maximise treatment effects for an individual with acquired dysgraphia.},
  language  = {en}
}