@article{NeuendorfJansenKuhletal.2022,
  author    = {Neuendorf, Claudia and Jansen, Matte and Kuhl, Poldi and Vock, Miriam},
  title     = {Wer ist leistungsstark?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000343},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Who is a high achiever? Operationalisation of high achievement in empirical educational research since the year 2000 Abstract. In recent years, high-achieving students have received increased attention by researchers, policymakers and practitioners. However, the question of what exactly constitutes high academic achievement is not yet agreed upon by the research community. This paper provides a systematic review of how researchers studying high-achieving students since 2000 have operationalized high academic achievement in their research. In particular, we examined which performance indicators were used, whether achievement was conceived of as subject-specific or general, and which cut-off values and comparison standards were applied. The systematic database search yielded N = 309 articles, n = 55 of which were finally included in the analysis. The present study observed a diversity in the operationalization of performance. The most commonly used indicators of performance were grades and test scores, with cross-domain and subject-specific definitions both being common. Some of the studies' cut-off values were difficult to compare, but in instances where a population norm could be derived, the median proportion of high achievers was 10 percent. The study discusses that constraints on generalizability and comparability between different studies on high achievers can arise due to methodological differences. This paper concludes with recommendations for the operationalization of high achievement.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VockGronostajKretschmannetal.2022,
  author    = {Vock, Miriam and Gronostaj, Anna and Kretschmann, Julia and Westphal, Andrea},
  title     = {Wie bewerten begabte und leistungsstarke Jugendliche in separaten Spezialklassen ihren Unterricht?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-022-01118-8},
  pages     = {1151 -- 1173},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Leistungsstarke und besonders begabte Sch{\"u}ler*innen werden im Unterricht oft nicht gen{\"u}gend gefordert. In speziellen Klassen f{\"u}r besonders Leistungsstarke und Begabte kann der Unterricht st{\"a}rker auf die Lernm{\"o}glichkeiten dieser Gruppe zugeschnitten werden. Spezialklassen gelten insgesamt als leistungsf{\"o}rderlich, Studien zur Unterrichtsqualit{\"a}t sind bisher jedoch rar. In dieser Studie wird untersucht, wie Sch{\"u}ler*innen der Leistungs- und Begabungsklassen (LuBK) im Land Brandenburg die Qualit{\"a}t ihres Unterrichts in Deutsch und Mathematik im Vergleich zu Sch{\"u}ler*innen von Regelklassen einsch{\"a}tzen. Die Datenbasis bilden N = 3371 Sch{\"u}ler*innen der 8. und 10. Jahrgangsstufe aus 33 Schulen. Mittels Frageb{\"o}gen wurden Merkmale der Unterrichtsqualit{\"a}t nach dem QuAIT-Modell erfragt; die Datenanalyse erfolgte mit regressionsanalytischen Mehrebenenmodellen. Die Sch{\"u}ler*innen der LuBK bewerten die Qualit{\"a}t ihres Unterrichts {\"u}berwiegend positiver als die Sch{\"u}ler*innen der Regelklassen, Defizite zeigen sich jedoch in beiden Klassentypen bei den Qualit{\"a}tsmerkmalen der inneren Differenzierung und der Mitsprache bei Unterrichtsthemen.},
  language  = {de}
}