@article{AndradeLuCordeiroetal.2022, author = {Andrade, Luis and Lu, Yunlong and Cordeiro, Andre and Costa, Jo{\~a}o M. F. and Wigge, Philip Anthony and Saibo, Nelson J. M. and Jaeger, Katja E.}, title = {The evening complex integrates photoperiod signals to control flowering in rice}, series = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America : PNAS}, volume = {119}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America : PNAS}, number = {26}, publisher = {National Acad. of Sciences}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0027-8424}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2122582119}, pages = {8}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Plants use photoperiodism to activate flowering in response to a particular daylength. In rice, flowering is accelerated in short-day conditions, and even a brief exposure to light during the dark period (night-break) is sufficient to delay flowering. Although many of the genes involved in controlling flowering in rice have been uncovered, how the long- and short-day flowering pathways are integrated, and the mechanism of photoperiod perception is not understood. While many of the signaling components controlling photoperiod-activated flowering are conserved between Arabidopsis and rice, flowering in these two systems is activated by opposite photoperiods. Here we establish that photoperiodism in rice is controlled by the evening complex (EC). We show that mutants in the EC genes LUX ARRYTHMO (LUX) and EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3) paralogs abolish rice flowering. We also show that the EC directly binds and suppresses the expression of flowering repressors, including PRR37 and Ghd7. We further demonstrate that light acts via phyB to cause a rapid and sustained posttranslational modification of ELF3-1. Our results suggest a mechanism by which the EC is able to control both long- and short-day flowering pathways.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Czesnick2014, author = {Czesnick, Hj{\"o}rdis}, title = {Functional specialization of Arabidopsis poly(A) polymerases in relation to flowering time and stress}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-78015}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {157}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Polyadenylation is a decisive 3' end processing step during the maturation of pre-mRNAs. The length of the poly(A) tail has an impact on mRNA stability, localization and translatability. Accordingly, many eukaryotic organisms encode several copies of canonical poly(A) polymerases (cPAPs). The disruption of cPAPs in mammals results in lethality. In plants, reduced cPAP activity is non-lethal. Arabidopsis encodes three nuclear cPAPs, PAPS1, PAPS2 and PAPS4, which are constitutively expressed throughout the plant. Recently, the detailed analysis of Arabidopsis paps1 mutants revealed a subset of genes that is preferentially polyadenylated by the cPAP isoform PAPS1 (Vi et al. 2013). Thus, the specialization of cPAPs might allow the regulation of different sets of genes in order to optimally face developmental or environmental challenges. To gain insights into the cPAP-based gene regulation in plants, the phenotypes of Arabidopsis cPAPs mutants under different conditions are characterized in detail in the following work. An involvement of all three cPAPs in flowering time regulation and stress response regulation is shown. While paps1 knockdown mutants flower early, paps4 and paps2 paps4 knockout mutants exhibit a moderate late-flowering phenotype. PAPS1 promotes the expression of the major flowering inhibitor FLC, supposedly by specific polyadenylation of an FLC activator. PAPS2 and PAPS4 exhibit partially overlapping functions and ensure timely flowering by repressing FLC and at least one other unidentified flowering inhibitor. The latter two cPAPs act in a novel regulatory pathway downstream of the autonomous pathway component FCA and act independently from the polyadenylation factors and flowering time regulators CstF64 and FY. Moreover, PAPS1 and PAPS2/PAPS4 are implicated in different stress response pathways in Arabidopsis. Reduced activity of the poly(A) polymerase PAPS1 results in enhanced resistance to osmotic and oxidative stress. Simultaneously, paps1 mutants are cold-sensitive. In contrast, PAPS2/PAPS4 are not involved in the regulation of osmotic or cold stress, but paps2 paps4 loss-of-function mutants exhibit enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress provoked in the chloroplast. Thus, both PAPS1 and PAPS2/PAPS4 are required to maintain a balanced redox state in plants. PAPS1 seems to fulfil this function in concert with CPSF30, a polyadenylation factor that regulates alternative polyadenylation and tolerance to oxidative stress. The individual paps mutant phenotypes and the cPAP-specific genetic interactions support the model of cPAP-dependent polyadenylation of selected mRNAs. The high similarity of the polyadenylation machineries in yeast, mammals and plants suggests that similar regulatory mechanisms might be present in other organism groups. The cPAP-dependent developmental and physiological pathways identified in this work allow the design of targeted experiments to better understand the ecological and molecular context underlying cPAP-specialization.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Gramma2023, author = {Gramma, Vladislav}, title = {Potato FLC-like and SVP-like proteins jointly control growth and distinct developmental processes}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {x, 138}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Based on worldwide consumption, Solanum tuberosum L. (potato) is the most important non-grain food crop. Potato has two ways of stable propagation: sexually via flowering and vegetatively via tuberization. Remarkably, these two developmental processes are controlled by similar molecular regulators and mechanisms. Given that FLC and SVP genes act as key flowering regulators in the model species Arabidopsis and in various other crop species, this study aimed at identifying FLC and SVP homologs in potato and investigating their roles in the regulation of plant development, with a particular focus on flowering and tuberization. Our analysis demonstrated that there are five FLC-like and three SVP like proteins encoded in the potato genome. The expression profiles of StFLCs and StSVPs throughout potato development and the detected interactions between their proteins indicate tissue specificity of the individual genes and distinct roles of a variety of putative protein complexes. In particular, we discovered that StFLC-D, as well as StFLC-B, StSVP-A, and StSVP-B play a complex role in the regulation of flowering time, as not only increased but also decreased levels of their transcripts promote earlier flowering. Most importantly, StFLC-D has a marked impact on tuberization under non-inductive conditions and susceptibility to temperature-induced tuber malformation, also known as second growth. Plants with decreased levels of StFLC-D demonstrated a strong ability to produce tubers under long days and appeared to be insensitive to temperature-induced second growth. Lastly, our data also suggests that StFLCs and StSVPs may be involved in the nitrogen-dependent regulation of potato development. Taken together, this study highlights the functional importance of StFLC and StSVP genes in the regulation of distinct developmental processes in potato.}, language = {en} }