@book{AdelhelmBraunMuelleretal.2011, author = {Adelhelm, Silvia and Braun, Andreas and M{\"u}ller, Elisabeth and Vladova, Gergana}, title = {Philo : PharmaInnovationsLotse ; ihr Weg zum erfolgreichen Open Innovation Management}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-103-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-50895}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {161}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Vorliegender Leitfaden ist eines der Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts „Open Innovation in Life Sciences" (OIL), das von Mai 2008 bis April 2011 an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam durchgef{\"u}hrt wurde. Er nimmt f{\"u}r sich in Anspruch, gerade Innovationsmanager in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (KMU) der Pharmaindustrie bei der Einf{\"u}hrung des Open Innovation Managements zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Zielsetzung des Forschungsprojekts war es, (1) die Chancen und Risiken von Open Innovation unter besonderer Ber{\"u}cksichtigung der Anforderungen von Pharma-KMU zu analysieren und (2) daraus abgeleitet ein Konzept zur Implementierung von Open Innovation bei Pharma-KMU zu entwickeln. Der Ausgangspunkt des Projektes war die Erkenntnis, dass die Life Sciences-Branche im Allgemeinen und die Pharmaindustrie im Besonderen durch eine steigende Komplexit{\"a}t der Innovationsprozesse und eine zunehmende Tendenz zu Kooperationen gekennzeichnet ist. Vor diesem Hintergrund er{\"o}ffnet gerade der Open Innovation-Ansatz f{\"u}r die Pharmabranche neue Gestaltungs- und damit Wachstumsm{\"o}glichkeiten. Open Innovation - definiert als die planvolle {\"O}ffnung der Innovationsprozesse und die strategische Einbindung des Unternehmensumfelds - wird dabei als zentraler Erfolgsfaktor f{\"u}r die Innovationsf{\"a}higkeit beschrieben.}, language = {de} } @techreport{AudretschHafensteinKritikosetal.2019, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Audretsch, David B. and Hafenstein, Marian and Kritikos, Alexander and Schiersch, Alexander}, title = {Firm Size and Innovation in the Service Sector}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, number = {4}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42767}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-427670}, pages = {46}, year = {2019}, abstract = {A rich literature links knowledge inputs with innovative outputs. However, most of what is known is restricted to manufacturing. This paper analyzes whether the three aspects involving innovative activity - R\&D; innovative output; and productivity - hold for knowledge intensive services. Combining the models of Crepon et al. (1998) and of Ackerberg et al. (2015), allows for causal interpretation of the relationship between innovation output and labor productivity. We find that knowledge intensive services benefit from innovation activities in the sense that these activities causally increase their labor productivity. Moreover, the firm size advantage found for manufacturing in previous studies nearly disappears for knowledge intensive services.}, language = {en} } @article{BaumannKritikos2016, author = {Baumann, Julian and Kritikos, Alexander}, title = {The link between R\&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?}, series = {Research Policy}, volume = {45}, journal = {Research Policy}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0048-7333}, doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.008}, pages = {1263 -- 1274}, year = {2016}, abstract = {We analyze the link between R\&D, innovation, and productivity in MSMEs with a special focus on micro firms with fewer than 10 employees; usually constituting the majority of firms in industrialized economies. Using the German KfW SME-panel, we examine to what extent micro firms are different from other firms in terms of innovativeness. We find that while firms engage in innovative activities with smaller probability, the smaller they are, for those firms that do make such investment, R\&D intensity is larger the smaller firms are. For all MSMEs, the predicted R\&D intensity is positively correlated with the probability of reporting innovation, with a larger effect size for product than for process innovations. Moreover, micro firms benefit in a comparable way from innovation processes as larger firms, as they are similarly able to increase their labor productivity. Overall, the link between R\&D, innovation, and productivity in micro firms does not largely differ from their larger counterparts. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @masterthesis{Buchholz2023, type = {Bachelor Thesis}, author = {Buchholz, Pauline}, title = {Die Einf{\"u}hrung des FREI DAYS an einer Berliner Grundschule}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-59188}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-591885}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {IV, 53}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Mit dem FREI DAY wurde ein neues Format entwickelt, welches schulisches Lernen an den globalen Nachhaltigkeitszielen ausrichten und zukunftsrelevante Kompetenzen von Kindern und Jugendlichen f{\"o}rdern soll. Ob es erfolgreich im Bildungssystem implementiert werden kann, wird insbesondere von der Ver{\"a}nderungsbereitschaft der Lehrkr{\"a}fte abh{\"a}ngen. Um sie bei der Umsetzung unterst{\"u}tzen zu k{\"o}nnen, ist notwendig, ihre individuelle Perspektive im Implementationsprozess zu erfassen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird untersucht, inwiefern sich das Kollegium einer Berliner Grundschule mit dem FREI DAY auseinandersetzt. Dazu wird auf die Stages of Concern von Hall und Hord (2015) zur{\"u}ckgegriffen und ein Interview mit der Lehrerin gef{\"u}hrt, die die Umsetzung des Lernformats an der Schule koordiniert. Ihre Antworten werden durch eine qualitative Analyse des Interviewtranskripts ausgewertet und vor dem Hintergrund der Forschungsfrage interpretiert. Es zeigt sich, dass das Kollegium hinsichtlich der Auseinandersetzung mit dem FREI DAY in drei Gruppen eingeteilt werden kann. W{\"a}hrend die erste von Anfang an begeistert und dazu bereit war, das Lernformat an der Schule einzuf{\"u}hren, war sich die zweite zun{\"a}chst nicht sicher, ob sie sich die Umsetzung zutraut. Schließlich gab es auch eine Gruppe von Lehrkr{\"a}ften, die kein Interesse daran hatte, sich eingehender mit dem Konzept des FREI DAYS zu befassen und sich dementsprechend auch nicht an der Umsetzung beteiligte. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung weisen darauf hin, dass Transferunterst{\"u}tzung, insbesondere vonseiten der Schulleitung, notwendig ist, wenn das Lernformat langfristig in unserem Bildungssystem verankert werden soll. Aufgrund des explorativen Charakters der Studie sind jedoch weitere Untersuchungen in dieser Hinsicht erforderlich.}, language = {de} } @article{CaliendoHogenackerKuennetal.2015, author = {Caliendo, Marco and Hogenacker, Jens and Kuenn, Steffen and Wiessner, Frank}, title = {Subsidized start-ups out of unemployment: a comparison to regular business start-ups}, series = {Small business economics : an international journal}, volume = {45}, journal = {Small business economics : an international journal}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {0921-898X}, doi = {10.1007/s11187-015-9646-0}, pages = {165 -- 190}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Offering unemployed individuals a subsidy to become self-employed is a widespread active labor market policy strategy. Previous studies have illustrated its high effectiveness to help participants escaping unemployment and improving their labor market prospects compared to other unemployed individuals. However, the examination of start-up subsidies from a business perspective has only received little attention to date. Using a new dataset based on a survey allows us to compare subsidized start-ups out of unemployment with regular business founders, with respect to not only personal characteristics but also business outcomes. The results indicate that previously unemployed entrepreneurs face disadvantages in variables correlated with entrepreneurial ability and access to capital. Nineteen months after start-up, the subsidized businesses experience higher survival, but lag behind regular business founders in terms of income, business growth and innovation. Moreover, we show that expected deadweight effects related to start-up subsidies occur on a (much) lower scale than usually assumed.}, language = {en} } @techreport{CaliendoKritikosStier2022, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Caliendo, Marco and Kritikos, Alexander and Stier, Claudia}, title = {The Influence of Start-up Motivation on Entrepreneurial Performance}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, number = {59}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-57115}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-571152}, pages = {43}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Predicting entrepreneurial development based on individual and business-related characteristics is a key objective of entrepreneurship research. In this context, we investigate whether the motives of becoming an entrepreneur influence the subsequent entrepreneurial development. In our analysis, we examine a broad range of business outcomes including survival and income, as well as job creation, expansion and innovation activities for up to 40 months after business formation. Using self-determination theory as conceptual background, we aggregate the start-up motives into a continuous motivational index. We show - based on a unique dataset of German start-ups from unemployment and non-unemployment - that the later business performance is better, the higher they score on this index. Effects are particularly strong for growth oriented outcomes like innovation and expansion activities. In a next step, we examine three underlying motivational categories that we term opportunity, career ambition, and necessity. We show that individuals driven by opportunity motives perform better in terms of innovation and business expansion activities, while career ambition is positively associated with survival, income, and the probability of hiring employees. All effects are robust to the inclusion of a large battery of covariates that are proven to be important determinants of entrepreneurial performance.}, language = {en} } @techreport{CaliendoKuennWeissenberger2019, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Caliendo, Marco and K{\"u}nn, Steffen and Weißenberger, Martin}, title = {Catching up or Lagging Behind?}, series = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, journal = {CEPA Discussion Papers}, number = {12}, issn = {2628-653X}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-43701}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-437012}, year = {2019}, abstract = {From an active labor market policy perspective, start-up subsidies for unemployed individuals are very effective in improving long-term labor market outcomes for participants. From a business perspective, however, the assessment of these public programs is less clear since they might attract individuals with low entrepreneurial abilities and produce businesses with low survival rates and little contribution to job creation, economic growth, and innovation. In this paper, we use a rich data set to compare participants of a German start-up subsidy program for unemployed individuals to a group of regular founders who started from nonunemployment and did not receive the subsidy. The data allows us to analyze their business performance up until 40 months after business formation. We find that formerly subsidized founders lag behind not only in survival and job creation, but especially also in innovation activities. The gaps in these business outcomes are relatively constant or even widening over time. Hence, we do not see any indication of catching up in the longer run. While the gap in survival can be entirely explained by initial differences in observable start-up characteristics, the gap in business development remains and seems to be the result of restricted access to capital as well as differential business strategies and dynamics. Considering these conflicting results for the assessment of the subsidy program from an ALMP and business perspective, policy makers need to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of such a strategy to find the right policy mix.}, language = {en} } @masterthesis{Dahl2021, type = {Bachelor Thesis}, author = {Dahl, Dorothee Sophie}, title = {Let's have FUN! Gamification im Mathematikunterricht}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-51593}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-515937}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {78}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Spiele und spieltypische Elemente wie das Sammeln von Treuepunkten sind aus dem Alltag kaum wegzudenken. Zudem werden sie zunehmend in Unternehmen oder in Lernumgebungen eingesetzt. Allerdings ist die Methode Gamification bisher f{\"u}r den p{\"a}dagogischen Kontext wenig klassifiziert und f{\"u}r Lehrende kaum zug{\"a}nglich gemacht worden. Daher zielt diese Bachelorarbeit darauf ab, eine systematische Strukturierung und Aufarbeitung von Gamification sowie innovative Ans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r die Verwendung spieltypischer Elemente im Unterricht, konkret dem Mathematikunterricht, zu pr{\"a}sentieren. Dies kann eine Grundlage f{\"u}r andere Fachgebiete, aber auch andere Lehrformen bieten und so die Umsetzbarkeit von Gamification in eigenen Lehrveranstaltungen aufzeigen. In der Arbeit wird begr{\"u}ndet, weshalb und mithilfe welcher Elemente Gamification die Motivation und Leistungsbereitschaft der Lernenden langfristig erh{\"o}hen, die Sozial- und Personalkompetenzen f{\"o}rdern sowie die Lernenden zu mehr Aktivit{\"a}t anregen kann. Zudem wird Gamification explizit mit grundlegenden mathematikdidaktischen Prinzipien in Verbindung gesetzt und somit die Relevanz f{\"u}r den Mathematikunterricht hervorgehoben. Anschließend werden die einzelnen Elemente von Gamification wie Punkte, Level, Abzeichen, Charaktere und Rahmengeschichte entlang einer eigens f{\"u}r den p{\"a}dagogischen Kontext entwickelten Klassifikation „FUN" (Feedback - User specific elements - Neutral elements) schematisch beschrieben, ihre Funktionen und Wirkung dargestellt sowie Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten im Unterricht aufgezeigt. Dies beinhaltet Ideen zu lernf{\"o}rderlichem Feedback, Differenzierungsm{\"o}glichkeiten und Unterrichtsrahmengestaltung, die in Lehrveranstaltungen aller Art umsetzbar sein k{\"o}nnen. Die Bachelorarbeit umfasst zudem ein spezifisches Beispiel, einen Unterrichtsentwurf einer gamifizierten Mathematikstunde inklusive des zugeh{\"o}rigen Arbeitsmaterials, anhand dessen die Verwendung von Gamification deutlich wird. Gamification offeriert oftmals Vorteile gegen{\"u}ber dem traditionellen Unterricht, muss jedoch wie jede Methode an den Inhalt und die Zielgruppe angepasst werden. Weiterf{\"u}hrende Forschung k{\"o}nnte sich mit konkreten motivationalen Strukturen, personenspezifischen Unterschieden sowie mit mathematischen Inhalten wie dem Probleml{\"o}sen oder dem Wechsel zwischen verschiedenen Darstellungen hinsichtlich gamifizierter Lehrformen besch{\"a}ftigen.}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Dribbisch2017, author = {Dribbisch, Katrin}, title = {Translating innovation}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-104719}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {VIII, 217}, year = {2017}, abstract = {This doctoral thesis studies the process of innovation adoption in public administrations, addressing the research question of how an innovation is translated to a local context. The study empirically explores Design Thinking as a new problem-solving approach introduced by a federal government organisation in Singapore. With a focus on user-centeredness, collaboration and iteration Design Thinking seems to offer a new way to engage recipients and other stakeholders of public services as well as to re-think the policy design process from a user's point of view. Pioneered in the private sector, early adopters of the methodology include civil services in Australia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, the United States as well as Singapore. Hitherto, there is not much evidence on how and for which purposes Design Thinking is used in the public sector. For the purpose of this study, innovation adoption is framed in an institutionalist perspective addressing how concepts are translated to local contexts. The study rejects simplistic views of the innovation adoption process, in which an idea diffuses to another setting without adaptation. The translation perspective is fruitful because it captures the multidimensionality and 'messiness' of innovation adoption. More specifically, the overall research question addressed in this study is: How has Design Thinking been translated to the local context of the public sector organisation under investigation? And from a theoretical point of view: What can we learn from translation theory about innovation adoption processes? Moreover, there are only few empirical studies of organisations adopting Design Thinking and most of them focus on private organisations. We know very little about how Design Thinking is embedded in public sector organisations. This study therefore provides further empirical evidence of how Design Thinking is used in a public sector organisation, especially with regards to its application to policy work which has so far been under-researched. An exploratory single case study approach was chosen to provide an in-depth analysis of the innovation adoption process. Based on a purposive, theory-driven sampling approach, a Singaporean Ministry was selected because it represented an organisational setting in which Design Thinking had been embedded for several years, making it a relevant case with regard to the research question. Following a qualitative research design, 28 semi-structured interviews (45-100 minutes) with employees and managers were conducted. The interview data was triangulated with observations and documents, collected during a field research research stay in Singapore. The empirical study of innovation adoption in a single organisation focused on the intra-organisational perspective, with the aim to capture the variations of translation that occur during the adoption process. In so doing, this study opened the black box often assumed in implementation studies. Second, this research advances translation studies not only by showing variance, but also by deriving explanatory factors. The main differences in the translation of Design Thinking occurred between service delivery and policy divisions, as well as between the first adopter and the rest of the organisation. For the intra-organisational translation of Design Thinking in the Singaporean Ministry the following five factors played a role: task type, mode of adoption, type of expertise, sequence of adoption, and the adoption of similar practices.}, language = {en} } @book{GerkenUebernickeldePaula2022, author = {Gerken, Stefanie and Uebernickel, Falk and de Paula, Danielly}, title = {Design Thinking: a Global Study on Implementation Practices in Organizations}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-525-5}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-53466}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-534668}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {230}, year = {2022}, abstract = {These days design thinking is no longer a "new approach". Among practitioners, as well as academics, interest in the topic has gathered pace over the last two decades. However, opinions are divided over the longevity of the phenomenon: whether design thinking is merely "old wine in new bottles," a passing trend, or still evolving as it is being spread to an increasing number of organizations and industries. Despite its growing relevance and the diffusion of design thinking, knowledge on the actual status quo in organizations remains scarce. With a new study, the research team of Prof. Uebernickel and Stefanie Gerken investigates temporal developments and changes in design thinking practices in organizations over the past six years comparing the results of the 2015 "Parts without a whole" study with current practices and future developments. Companies of all sizes and from different parts of the world participated in the survey. The findings from qualitative interviews with experts, i.e., people who have years of knowledge with design thinking, were cross-checked with the results from an exploratory analysis of the survey data. This analysis uncovers significant variances and similarities in how design thinking is interpreted and applied in businesses.}, language = {en} }