@article{ZimmermannWeiss2020,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Weiß, Norman},
  title     = {V{\"o}lker- und verfassungsrechtliche Parameter eines deutschen Lieferkettengesetzes},
  series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Mohr Siebeck},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  issn      = {0003-892X},
  doi       = {10.1628/avr-2020-0028},
  pages     = {424 -- 463},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Currently a political debate is ongoing in Germany as to whether Germany should, following the example of several other European countries such as France and the Netherlands, adopt a Supply Chain Act (Lieferkettengesetz). If adopted, the act in question would impose due diligence obligations on German corporations to prevent human rights violations taking place in their respective global supply chains. It is against this background that the article examines the preconditions that must be met in order for such act to be eventually compatible with both, German constitutional and international law. The authors further deal with the question whether Germany might even be obliged under international, as well as under German constitutional law, to enact such a supply chain law in order to protect the human rights of workers employed by companies forming part of the global supply chains of German companies. As far as German constitutional law is concerned the article notably deals with the question whether it is the Federal parliament that may adopt such a law also taking into account the competencies of the European Union in the field, and what are the requirements of legal specificity and proportionality in order for the draft law to stand constitutional scrutiny. The authors further offer detailed suggestions how corporate due diligence standards might be best provided for in the envisaged law and propose a risk analysis approach that varies not only according to specific countries and sector-specific characteristics, but that by the same token also takes into account the ability of the respective German company to exercise an appropriate due diligence standard when it comes to human rigths issues arising within the framewok of their supply chain. As far as the substantive human rights standards are concerned that should serve as benchmarks for the envisaged Supply Chain Act the authors propose to rely on, and refer to, those instruments such as the ICCPR and the CESCR, as well as the ILO treaties containing core labour standards, that enjoy almost universal acceptance and reflect customary international law.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannVonMangoldt2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Von Mangoldt, Hermann},
  title     = {Article 53},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannThienel2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Thienel, Tobias},
  title     = {Article 60},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannRoemer2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and R{\"o}mer, Lutz},
  title     = {Artikel 27 Dublin III-Verordnung : das Ende des Konzepts "normativer Vergewisserung"},
  isbn      = {978-3-8114-3914-6},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannLandefeld2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Landefeld, Sarina},
  title     = {Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention und Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht der Konventionsstaaten},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Ausl{\"a}nderrecht und Ausl{\"a}nderpolitik : ZAR},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Ausl{\"a}nderrecht und Ausl{\"a}nderpolitik : ZAR},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  issn      = {0721-5746},
  pages     = {97 -- 136},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannHerrmann2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska},
  title     = {70 Jahre Genfer Fl{\"u}chtlingskonvention},
  series = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  journal   = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Luchterhand},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln ; Neuwied},
  issn      = {0174-2108},
  pages     = {221 -- 227},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannHenn2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Henn, Elisabeth V.},
  title     = {Das Aggressionsverbrechen und das deutsche Strafrecht},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannElberling2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Elberling, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Kapitel 27 : Ausweisungsschutz},
  isbn      = {978-3-16-149397-3},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannBaeumler2010,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and B{\"a}umler, Jelena},
  title     = {Der Afrikanische Gerichtshof f{\"u}r Menschen- und V{\"o}lkerrechte : aktuelle Herausforderungen},
  issn      = {0177-7521},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannBerdefy2023,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Berdefy, Alina-Camille},
  title     = {Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit im Kontext des Krieges gegen die Ukraine},
  series = {Europ{\"a}ische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Europ{\"a}ische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1-8},
  publisher = {Engel},
  address   = {Kehl am Rhein},
  issn      = {0341-9800},
  pages     = {40 -- 48},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Angesichts der dramatischen Lage in der Ukraine untersucht der folgende Beitrag, auf welchem Wege, vor welchen v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Gerichten, in welchem Umfang und mit welcher Aussicht auf Erfolg die Ukraine oder einzelne ukrainische Staatsangeh{\"o}rige Sicherheitsschutz vor der russischen Invasion und/oder den im Zusammenhang damit bereits begangenen oder noch bevorstehenden V{\"o}lkerrechtsverst{\"o}ßen Rechtsschutz erlangen k{\"o}nnen. Im Einzelnen handelt es sich hierbei um zwei anh{\"a}ngige Verfahren vor dem Internationalen Gerichtshof, mehrere Staaten- sowie eine große Vielzahl von Individualbeschwerden vor dem Europ{\"a}ischen Gerichtshof f{\"u}r Menschenrechte; ein Verfahren vor dem Internationalen Seegerichtshof; zahlreiche Investitionsverfahren vor internationalen Schiedsgerichten sowie schließlich zwei "Situationen" vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof. Abschließend wird die Option der Schaffung eines ad-hoc-Tribunals f{\"u}r das Verbrechen der Aggression behandelt.},
  language  = {de}
}