@inproceedings{HaaseMatthiesenSchueffleretal.2020,
  author    = {Haase, Jennifer and Matthiesen, Julia and Sch{\"u}ffler, Arnulf and Kluge, Annette},
  title     = {Retentivity beats prior knowledge as predictor for the acquisition and adaptation of new production processes},
  series = {Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences},
  volume    = {53},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences},
  publisher = {Western Periodicals Co.},
  address   = {North Hollywood, Calif.},
  doi       = {10125/64331},
  pages     = {4797 -- 4805},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In the time of digitalization the demand for organizational change is rising and demands ways to cope with fundamental changes on the organizational as well as individual level. As a basis, learning and forgetting mechanisms need to be understood in order to guide a change process efficiently and successfully. Our research aims to get a better understanding of individual differences and mechanisms in the change context by performing an experiment where individuals learn and later re-learn a complex production process using a simulation setting. The individual's performance, as well as retentivity and prior knowledge is assessed. Our results show that higher retentivity goes along with better learning and forgetting performances. Prior knowledge did not reveal such relation to the learning and forgetting performances. The influence of age and gender is discussed in detail.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KurzOrlandPosadzy2018,
  author    = {Kurz, Verena and Orland, Andreas and Posadzy, Kinga},
  title     = {Fairness versus efficiency},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {117},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43261},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-432611},
  pages     = {601 -- 626},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {We investigate in a laboratory experiment whether procedural fairness concerns affect how well individuals are able to solve a coordination problem in a two-player Volunteer's Dilemma. Subjects receive external action recommendations, either to volunteer or to abstain from it, in order to facilitate coordination and improve efficiency. We manipulate the fairness of the recommendation procedure by varying the probabilities of receiving the disadvantageous recommendation to volunteer between players. We find evidence that while recommendations improve overall efficiency regardless of their implications for expected payoffs, there are behavioural asymmetries depending on the recommendation: advantageous recommendations are followed less frequently than disadvantageous ones and beliefs about others' actions are more pessimistic in the treatment with recommendations inducing unequal expected payoffs.},
  language  = {en}
}