@article{CrawfordKaramatLehotaietal.2020, author = {Crawford, Tim and Karamat, Fazeelat and Lehotai, N{\´o}ra and Rentoft, Matilda and Blomberg, Jeanette and Strand, {\AA}sa and Bj{\"o}rklund, Stefan}, title = {Specific functions for mediator complex subunits from different modules in the transcriptional response of arabidopsis thaliana to abiotic stress}, series = {Scientific reports}, volume = {10}, journal = {Scientific reports}, number = {1}, publisher = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature}, address = {London}, issn = {2045-2322}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-61758-w}, pages = {1 -- 18}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Adverse environmental conditions are detrimental to plant growth and development. Acclimation to abiotic stress conditions involves activation of signaling pathways which often results in changes in gene expression via networks of transcription factors (TFs). Mediator is a highly conserved co-regulator complex and an essential component of the transcriptional machinery in eukaryotes. Some Mediator subunits have been implicated in stress-responsive signaling pathways; however, much remains unknown regarding the role of plant Mediator in abiotic stress responses. Here, we use RNA-seq to analyze the transcriptional response of Arabidopsis thaliana to heat, cold and salt stress conditions. We identify a set of common abiotic stress regulons and describe the sequential and combinatorial nature of TFs involved in their transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, we identify stress-specific roles for the Mediator subunits MED9, MED16, MED18 and CDK8, and putative TFs connecting them to different stress signaling pathways. Our data also indicate different modes of action for subunits or modules of Mediator at the same gene loci, including a co-repressor function for MED16 prior to stress. These results illuminate a poorly understood but important player in the transcriptional response of plants to abiotic stress and identify target genes and mechanisms as a prelude to further biochemical characterization.}, language = {en} } @misc{CrawfordKaramatLehotaietal.2020, author = {Crawford, Tim and Karamat, Fazeelat and Lehotai, N{\´o}ra and Rentoft, Matilda and Blomberg, Jeanette and Strand, {\AA}sa and Bj{\"o}rklund, Stefan}, title = {Specific functions for mediator complex subunits from different modules in the transcriptional response of arabidopsis thaliana to abiotic stress}, series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {1}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-51366}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-513666}, pages = {20}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Adverse environmental conditions are detrimental to plant growth and development. Acclimation to abiotic stress conditions involves activation of signaling pathways which often results in changes in gene expression via networks of transcription factors (TFs). Mediator is a highly conserved co-regulator complex and an essential component of the transcriptional machinery in eukaryotes. Some Mediator subunits have been implicated in stress-responsive signaling pathways; however, much remains unknown regarding the role of plant Mediator in abiotic stress responses. Here, we use RNA-seq to analyze the transcriptional response of Arabidopsis thaliana to heat, cold and salt stress conditions. We identify a set of common abiotic stress regulons and describe the sequential and combinatorial nature of TFs involved in their transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, we identify stress-specific roles for the Mediator subunits MED9, MED16, MED18 and CDK8, and putative TFs connecting them to different stress signaling pathways. Our data also indicate different modes of action for subunits or modules of Mediator at the same gene loci, including a co-repressor function for MED16 prior to stress. These results illuminate a poorly understood but important player in the transcriptional response of plants to abiotic stress and identify target genes and mechanisms as a prelude to further biochemical characterization.}, language = {en} } @article{HeldPascaudEckertetal.2011, author = {Held, Katrin and Pascaud, Francois and Eckert, Christian and Gajdanowicz, Pawel and Hashimoto, Kenji and Corratge-Faillie, Claire and Offenborn, Jan Niklas and Lacombe, Benoit and Dreyer, Ingo and Thibaud, Jean-Baptiste and Kudla, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Calcium-dependent modulation and plasma membrane targeting of the AKT2 potassium channel by the CBL4/CIPK6 calcium sensor/protein kinase complex}, series = {Cell research}, volume = {21}, journal = {Cell research}, number = {7}, publisher = {Nature Publ. Group}, address = {Shanghai}, issn = {1001-0602}, doi = {10.1038/cr.2011.50}, pages = {1116 -- 1130}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Potassium (K(+)) channel function is fundamental to many physiological processes. However, components and mechanisms regulating the activity of plant K(+) channels remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the calcium (Ca(2+)) sensor CBL4 together with the interacting protein kinase CIPK6 modulates the activity and plasma membrane (PM) targeting of the K(+) channel AKT2 from Arabidopsis thaliana by mediating translocation of AKT2 to the PM in plant cells and enhancing AKT2 activity in oocytes. Accordingly, akt2, cbl4 and cipk6 mutants share similar developmental and delayed flowering phenotypes. Moreover, the isolated regulatory C-terminal domain of CIPK6 is sufficient for mediating CBL4- and Ca(2+)-dependent channel translocation from the endoplasmic reticulum membrane to the PM by a novel targeting pathway that is dependent on dual lipid modifications of CBL4 by myristoylation and palmitoylation. Thus, we describe a critical mechanism of ion-channel regulation where a Ca(2+) sensor modulates K(+) channel activity by promoting a kinase interaction-dependent but phosphorylation-independent translocation of the channel to the PM.}, language = {en} } @article{NeuschaeferRubePatheNeuschaeferRubeHippenstieletal.2013, author = {Neusch{\"a}fer-Rube, Frank and Pathe-Neusch{\"a}fer-Rube, A. and Hippenstiel, S. and Kracht, M. and P{\"u}schel, Gerhard Paul}, title = {NF-kB-dependent IL-8 induction by prostaglandin EP2 receptors EP1 and EP4}, series = {British journal of pharmacology : journal of The British Pharmacological Society}, volume = {168}, journal = {British journal of pharmacology : journal of The British Pharmacological Society}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0007-1188}, doi = {10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02182.x}, pages = {704 -- 717}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background and Purpose Recent studies suggested a role for PGE2 in the expression of the chemokine IL-8. PGE2 signals via four different GPCRs, EP1-EP4. The role of EP1 and EP4 receptors for IL-8 induction was studied in HEK293 cells, overexpressing EP1 (HEK-EP1), EP4 (HEK-EP4) or both receptors (HEK-EP1 + EP4). Experimental Approach IL-8 mRNA and protein induction and IL-8 promoter and NF-?B activation were assessed in EP expressing HEK cells. Key Results In HEK-EP1 and HEK-EP1 + EP4 but not HEK or HEK-EP4 cells, PGE2 activated the IL-8 promoter and induced IL-8 mRNA and protein synthesis. Stimulation of HEK-EP1 + EP4 cells with an EP1-specific agonist activated IL-8 promoter and induced IL-8 mRNA and protein, whereas a specific EP4 agonist neither activated the IL-8 promoter nor induced IL-8 mRNA and protein synthesis. Simultaneous stimulation of HEK- EP1 + EP4 cells with both agonists activated IL-8 promoter and induced IL-8 mRNA to the same extent as PGE2. In HEK-EP1 + EP4 cells, PGE2-mediated IL-8 promoter activation and IL-8 mRNA induction were blunted by inhibition of I?B kinase. PGE2 activated NF-?B in HEK-EP1, HEK-EP4 and HEK-EP1 + EP4 cells. In HEK-EP1 + EP4 cells, simultaneous activation of both receptors was needed for maximal PGE2-induced NF-?B activation. PGE2-stimulated NF-?B activation by EP1 was blocked by inhibitors of PLC, calcium-signalling and Src-kinase, whereas that induced by EP4 was only blunted by Src-kinase inhibition. Conclusions and Implications These findings suggest that PGE2-mediated NF-?B activation by simultaneous stimulation of EP1 and EP4 receptors induces maximal IL-8 promoter activation and IL-8 mRNA and protein induction.}, language = {en} } @misc{PetrovHilleMuellerRoeberetal.2015, author = {Petrov, Veselin and Hille, Jacques and M{\"u}ller-R{\"o}ber, Bernd and Gechev, Tsanko S.}, title = {ROS-mediated abiotic stress-induced programmed cell death in plants}, series = {Frontiers in plant science}, volume = {6}, journal = {Frontiers in plant science}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-462X}, doi = {10.3389/fpls.2015.00069}, pages = {16}, year = {2015}, abstract = {During the course of their ontogenesis plants are continuously exposed to a large variety of abiotic stress factors which can damage tissues and jeopardize the survival of the organism unless properly countered. While animals can simply escape and thus evade stressors, plants as sessile organisms have developed complex strategies to withstand them. When the intensity of a detrimental factor is high, one of the defense programs employed by plants is the induction of programmed cell death (PCD). This is an active, genetically controlled process which is initiated to isolate and remove damaged tissues thereby ensuring the survival of the organism. The mechanism of PCD induction usually includes an increase in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are utilized as mediators of the stress signal. Abiotic stress-induced PCD is not only a process of fundamental biological importance, but also of considerable interest to agricultural practice as it has the potential to significantly influence crop yield. Therefore, numerous scientific enterprises have focused on elucidating the mechanisms leading to and controlling PCD in response to adverse conditions in plants. This knowledge may help develop novel strategies to obtain more resilient crop varieties with improved tolerance and enhanced productivity. The aim of the present review is to summarize the recent advances in research on ROS-induced PCD related to abiotic stress and the role of the organelles in the process.}, language = {en} } @misc{PetrovHilleMuellerRoeberetal.2015, author = {Petrov, Veselin and Hille, Jacques and M{\"u}ller-R{\"o}ber, Bernd and Gechev, Tsanko S.}, title = {ROS-mediated abiotic stress-induced programmed cell death in plants}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {425}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-406481}, pages = {16}, year = {2015}, abstract = {During the course of their ontogenesis plants are continuously exposed to a large variety of abiotic stress factors which can damage tissues and jeopardize the survival of the organism unless properly countered. While animals can simply escape and thus evade stressors, plants as sessile organisms have developed complex strategies to withstand them. When the intensity of a detrimental factor is high, one of the defense programs employed by plants is the induction of programmed cell death (PCD). This is an active, genetically controlled process which is initiated to isolate and remove damaged tissues thereby ensuring the survival of the organism. The mechanism of PCD induction usually includes an increase in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are utilized as mediators of the stress signal. Abiotic stress-induced PCD is not only a process of fundamental biological importance, but also of considerable interest to agricultural practice as it has the potential to significantly influence crop yield. Therefore, numerous scientific enterprises have focused on elucidating the mechanisms leading to and controlling PCD in response to adverse conditions in plants. This knowledge may help develop novel strategies to obtain more resilient crop varieties with improved tolerance and enhanced productivity. The aim of the present review is to summarize the recent advances in research on ROS-induced PCD related to abiotic stress and the role of the organelles in the process.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Strohm2010, author = {Strohm, Daniela}, title = {Modulation der Insulinsignalgebung durch Prostaglandin E2 und Endocannabinoide}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-49678}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Die adipositasbedingte Insulinresistenz geht mit einer unterschwelligen Entz{\"u}ndungsreaktion einher. Als Antwort auf dieses Entz{\"u}ndungsgeschehen wird PGE2 unter anderem von Kupffer Zellen der Leber freigesetzt und kann seine Wirkung {\"u}ber vier PGE2-Rezeptorsubtypen (EP1-EP4) vermitteln. In vorangegangenen Arbeiten konnte gezeigt werden, dass PGE2 in Rattenhepatozyten {\"u}ber den EP3 R ERK1/2-abh{\"a}ngig die intrazellul{\"a}re Weiterleitung des Insulinsignals hemmt. {\"U}ber die Modulation der Insulinrezeptorsignalkette durch andere EP-Rezeptoren war bisher nichts bekannt. Daher sollte in stabil transfizierten Zelllinien, die jeweils nur einen der vier EP-Rezeptorsubtypen exprimierten, der Einfluss von PGE2 auf die Insulinrezeptorsignalkette untersucht werden. Es wurden HepG2-Zellen, die keinen funktionalen EP-Rezeptor aufwiesen, sowie HepG2-Zellen, die stabil den EP1-R (HepG2-EP1), den EP3β-R (HepG2 EP3β) oder den EP4-R (HepG2 EP4) exprimierten, sowie die humane f{\"o}tale Hepatozytenzelllinie, Fh hTert, die den EP2- und den EP4-R exprimierte, f{\"u}r die Untersuchungen verwendet. Die Zellen wurden f{\"u}r 330 min mit PGE2 (10 µM) vorinkubiert, um die pathophysiologische Situation nachzustellen und anschließend mit Insulin (10 nM) f{\"u}r 15 min stimuliert. Die insulinabh{\"a}ngige Akt- und ERK1/2-Phosphorylierung wurde im Western-Blot bestimmt. In allen Hepatomzelllinien die EP-R exprimierten, nicht aber in der Zelllinie, die keinen EP R exprimierte, hemmte PGE2 die insulinstimulierte Akt-Phosphorylierung. In allen drei stabil transfizierten Zelllinien, nicht jedoch in den Fh-hTert-Zellen, steigerte PGE2 die basale und insulinstimulierte Phosphorylierung der Serin/Threoninkinase ERK1/2. In den HepG2 EP1- und den HepG2-EP3β-Zellen steigerte PGE2 mutmaßlich {\"u}ber die ERK1/2-Aktivierung die Serinphosphorylierung des IRS, welche die Weiterleitung des Insulinsignals blockiert. Die Hemmung der Aktivierung von ERK1/2 hob in EP3 R-exprimierenden Zellen die Abschw{\"a}chung der Insulinsignal{\"u}bertragung teilweise auf. In diesen Zellen scheint die ERK1/2-Aktivierung die gr{\"o}ßte Bedeutung f{\"u}r die Hemmung der insulinstimulierten Akt-Phosphorylierung zu haben. Da durch die Hemmstoffe die PGE2-abh{\"a}ngige Modulation nicht vollst{\"a}ndig aufgehoben wurde, scheinen dar{\"u}ber hinaus aber noch andere Mechanismen zur Modulation beizutragen. In den Fh hTert-Zellen wurde die Insulinrezeptorsignalkette offensichtlich {\"u}ber einen ERK1/2-unabh{\"a}ngigen, bisher nicht identifizierten Weg unterbrochen. Eine gesteigerte PGE2-Bildung im Rahmen der Adipositas ist nicht auf die peripheren Gewebe beschr{\"a}nkt. Auch im Hypothalamus k{\"o}nnen bei Adipositas Zeichen einer Entz{\"u}ndung nachgewiesen werden, die mit einer gesteigerten PGE2-Bildung einhergehen. Daher wurde das EP R-Profil von prim{\"a}ren hypothalamischen Neuronen und neuronalen Modellzelllinien charakterisiert, um zu pr{\"u}fen, ob PGE2 in hypothalamischen Neuronen die Insulinsignalkette in {\"a}hnlicher Weise unterbricht wie in Hepatozyten. In allen neuronalen Zellen hemmte die Vorinkubation mit PGE2 die insulinstimulierte Akt-Phosphorylierung nicht. In der neuronalen hypothalamischen Zelllinie N 41 wirkte PGE2 eher synergistisch mit Insulin. In durch Retins{\"a}ure ausdifferenzierten SH SY5Y-Zellen waren die Ergebnisse allerdings widerspr{\"u}chlich. Dies k{\"o}nnte darauf zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren sein, dass die Expression der EP Rezeptoren im Verlauf der Kultur stark schwankte und somit die EP R-Ausstattung der Zellen zwischen den Zellversuchen variierte. Auch in den prim{\"a}ren hypothalamischen Neuronen variierte die EP R-Expression abh{\"a}ngig vom Differenzierungszustand und PGE2 beeinflusste die insulinstimulierte Akt-Phosphorylierung nicht. Obwohl in allen neuronalen Zellen die Akt-Phosphorylierung durch Insulin gesteigert wurde, konnte in keiner der Zellen eine insulinabh{\"a}ngige Regulation der Expression von Insulinzielgenen (POMC und AgRP) nachgewiesen werden. Das liegt wahrscheinlich an dem niedrigen Differenzierungsgrad der untersuchten Zellen. Im Rahmen der Adipositas kommt es zu einer {\"U}beraktivierung des Endocannabinoidsystems. Endocannabinoidrezeptoren sind mit den EP Rezeptoren verwandt. Daher wurde gepr{\"u}ft, ob Endocannabinoide die Insulinsignalweiterleitung in {\"a}hnlicher Weise beeinflussen k{\"o}nnen wie PGE2. Die Vorinkubation der N 41-Zellen f{\"u}r 330 min mit einem Endocannabinoidrezeptoragonisten steigerte die insulinstimulierte Akt-Phosphorylierung, was auf einen insulinsensitiven Effekt von Endocannabinoiden hindeutet. Dies steht im Widerspruch zu der in der Literatur beschriebenen endocannabinoidabh{\"a}ngigen Insulinresistenz, die aber auf indirekte, durch Endocannabinoide ausgel{\"o}ste Ver{\"a}nderungen zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren sein k{\"o}nnte.}, language = {de} } @misc{VogtSchippers2015, author = {Vogt, Julia H. M. and Schippers, Jos H. M.}, title = {Setting the PAS, the role of circadian PAS domain proteins during environmental adaptation in plants}, series = {Frontiers in plant science}, volume = {6}, journal = {Frontiers in plant science}, publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-462X}, doi = {10.3389/fpls.2015.00513}, pages = {10}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The per-ARNT-sim (PAS) domain represents an ancient protein module that can be found across all kingdoms of life. The domain functions as a sensing unit for a diverse array of signals, including molecular oxygen, small metabolites, and light. In plants, several PAS domain-containing proteins form an integral part of the circadian clock and regulate responses to environmental change. Moreover, these proteins function in pathways that control development and plant stress adaptation responses. Here, we discuss the role of PAS domain-containing proteins in anticipation, and adaptation to environmental changes in plants.}, language = {en} } @misc{VogtSchippers2015, author = {Vogt, Julia H. M. and Schippers, Jos H. M.}, title = {Setting the PAS, the role of circadian PAS domain proteins during environmental adaptation in plants}, series = {Frontiers in plant science}, journal = {Frontiers in plant science}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-406492}, pages = {10}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The per-ARNT-sim (PAS) domain represents an ancient protein module that can be found across all kingdoms of life. The domain functions as a sensing unit for a diverse array of signals, including molecular oxygen, small metabolites, and light. In plants, several PAS domain-containing proteins form an integral part of the circadian clock and regulate responses to environmental change. Moreover, these proteins function in pathways that control development and plant stress adaptation responses. Here, we discuss the role of PAS domain-containing proteins in anticipation, and adaptation to environmental changes in plants.}, language = {en} }