@article{HenkeBogdaLambrechtetal.2017,
  author    = {Henke, Thorsten and Bogda, Katja and Lambrecht, Jennifer and Bosse, Stefanie and Koch, Helvi and Maaz, Kai and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Will you be my friend? A multilevel network analysis of friendships of students with and without special educational needs backgrounds in inclusive classrooms},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-017-0767-x},
  pages     = {449 -- 474},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between having a special educational needs background (SEN) and the likelihood of having friends in inclusive classes. We assumed that a combination of individual, dyadic and contextual variables can sufficiently explain the relation between a SEN diagnosis and the likelihood of friendship. Data analysis was based on a cross-sectional sample of students (N = 1241) in second and third grade primary-school classes. To address the different levels adequately, the present study improves upon previous research in two ways: First, the sociometric data were analyzed with the p2 model, a specialized multilevel network model. Second, the study focused solely on friendships and emphasized the concept's unique features with respect to inclusive education. Data analysis indicated that students with SEN had a decreased probability of becoming friends with their classmates compared to students without SEN. Even when individual, dyadic, and contextual variables were included into the model, the association between a SEN diagnosis and the likelihood of friendship persisted. The implications of the results are discussed with respect to their implications for inclusive teaching practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HenkeBosseLambrechtetal.2017,
  author    = {Henke, Thorsten and Bosse, Stefanie and Lambrecht, Jennifer and J{\"a}ntsch, Christian and Jaeuthe, Jessica and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Mittendrin oder nur dabei?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  volume    = {31},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000196},
  pages     = {111 -- 123},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {In der vorliegenden Studie wurde das Ausmaß der sozialen Partizipation von Grundsch{\"u}lerinnen und Grundsch{\"u}lern mit einem und ohne festgestelltem sonderp{\"a}dagogischem F{\"o}rderbedarf (SPF) untersucht. Insgesamt wurden N = 1436 Sch{\"u}ler der 2. und 3. Jahrgangsstufe mittels Frageb{\"o}gen zum peerbezogenen Klassenklima, zur Einsch{\"a}tzung der eigenen sozialen Integration, zum Gef{\"u}hl des Angenommen-Seins durch die Lehrkraft und zur Anzahl ihrer Freundschaften befragt. Mithilfe des Propensity Score Matching-Verfahrens wurden den Sch{\"u}lern mit einem festgestellten SPF in den Bereichen Lernen, emotionale und soziale Entwicklung oder Sprache (N = 91) basierend auf theoretisch und empirisch abgeleiteten Hintergrundvariablen statistische Zwillinge ohne SPF zugeordnet. Zu den Hintergrundvariablen z{\"a}hlten famili{\"a}re, leistungs- und verhaltensbezogene Merkmale. Der Vergleich der Sch{\"u}ler mit einem festgestellten SPF mit ihren statistischen Zwillingen ohne SPF lieferte keine Hinweise auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen dem Status eines SPF und der sozialen Partizipation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HuberGebhardtSchwab2015,
  author    = {Huber, Christian and Gebhardt, Markus and Schwab, Susanne},
  title     = {Teacher feedback or fun playing games? An experimental study investigating the influence of teacher feedback on social acceptance in primary school},
  series = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Reinhardt},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0342-183X},
  doi       = {10.2378/peu2015.art04d},
  pages     = {51 -- 64},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LautenbachAntoniewicz2018,
  author    = {Lautenbach, Franziska and Antoniewicz, Franziska},
  title     = {Ambivalent implicit attitudes towards inclusion in preservice PE teachers},
  series = {Teaching and Teacher Education},
  volume    = {72},
  journal   = {Teaching and Teacher Education},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0742-051X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.003},
  pages     = {24 -- 32},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Explicit attitudes towards inclusion are increasingly investigated in (preservice) teachers. However, few studies examine implicit attitudes towards inclusion, despite the advantage of being less sensitive to social desirability. Since inclusion is a sensitive topic, we aimed to investigate implicit and explicit attitudes towards inclusion as well as interactions between these attitudes. Using the Single-Target Implicit Association Test, early semester preservice teachers exhibited ambivalent implicit attitudes and positive explicit attitudes. Implicit attitudes were negatively correlated with explicit attitudes. Methodological and contentual explanations for these findings are discussed and theory-based implications for university education are suggested.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wobbe2012,
  author    = {Wobbe, Theresa},
  title     = {Making up People occupational classification patterns, gendered categorization, and economic inclusion around 1900 in Germany},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {41},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Lucius \& Lucius},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0340-1804},
  pages     = {41 -- 57},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {According to gender and labor market research, differentiation of male and female work is not primarily grounded in specific tasks but rather rooted in male and female features attributed to work. In this paper, the effects of classification patterns are related to the categories used in occupational statistics. According to this argument statistical patterns contribute to gradual processes of inclusion into society by categorizing people. Put more precisely, this process of "making up people" (Hacking 1986) is conflated with gendered views of persons. This conceptual conflation is examined in the historical context of emerging occupational statistics, social sciences, and law in Germany around 1900. Inasmuch as statistical observation differentiated between economically productive and non-productive work, gendered distinctions were deeply encoded in its categories. These distinctions were institutionalized by means of the social scientific definition of role models as well as legal codification. In the conclusion, the sociology of knowledge approach followed in this paper is extended toward a discussion of broader questions of inclusion and gender inequality. In order to explain the persistence of gendered classifications in the organization of work in society, further gender inequality research needs to account for the enduring social evidence and symbolic relevance of sex classifications at the meso and macro levels.},
  language  = {de}
}